PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK ROUTING PROTOCOLS

References

[1] Akyildiz F, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayici E. A sur-vey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2002 Aug; 40(8):102–14.

[2] Toghian M, Morogan MC. Suggesting a method to improve encryption key management in Wireless Sensor Networks. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Aug; 8(19):1–17.

[3] Mishra N K, Jain V, Sahu S. Survey on recent clustering algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2013 Apr; 3(4):1– 4.

[4] Singh SP, Sharma SC. A survey on cluster based routing protocols in Wireless Sensor Network. Science Direct. Pro-cedia Computer Science. 2015; 45:687–95.

[5] Syed SA, Kumaranand TS, Ahmed AS. Energy efficiency distributed routing algorithm based on HAC clustering method for WSN. Indian Journal of Science and Technolo-gy. 2014 Nov; 7(S7):66–75.

[6] Abbasi AA, Younis M. A survey on clustering algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks. Computer Communica-tions. 2007 Oct; 30(14-15):2826–41.

[7] Deosarkar BP, Yada NS, Yadav RP. Cluster head selection in clustering algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks: A sur-vey. Proceedings of the International Conference on Com-puting, Communication and Networking; Virgin Islands, USA. 2008 Dec 8-10. p. 1–8.

[8] Ramesh K, Somasundaram K. A comparative study of clus-ter head selection algorithmsin Wireless Sensor Networks. IJCSES. 2011 Nov; 2(4):153–64.

[9] Katiyar V, Chand N, Soni S. Clustering algorithms for het-erogeneous Wireless Sensor Network: A survey. Interna-tional Journal of Applied Engineering Research. Dindigul. 2010; 1(2):273–87.

[10] Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan AP, Balakrishnan H. An application specific protocol architecture for wireless mi- crosensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Com-munications. 2002 Oct; 1(4):660–70.

[11] Shankar T, Karthikeyan A, Sivasankar P, Neha RR. Im-plementation of smart sleep mechanism and hybrid data collection technique for maximizing network lifetime in WSN’s. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 May; 8(S9):1–8.

[12] Smaragdakis G, Matta I, Bestavros A. SEP: A stable elec-tion protocol for clustered heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks. Massachusetts: Boston University; 2010. p. 1–11.

[13] Faisal S, Javaid N, Javaid A, Khan MA, Bouk SH, Khan ZA. Z-SEP: Zonal-stable election protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research. 2013; 3(5):132–9.

[14] Qing L, Zhu M, Wang M. Design of a distributed energy-ef-ficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks. Computer Communications. 2006 Aug; 29(12):2230–7.

[15] Kaur J, Gaba GS, Miglani R, Pasricha R. Energy efficient and reliable WSN based on improved LEACH-R clustering techniques. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Jul; 8(16):1 –6. 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i16/70896.

@article{1700224,
      author = {KANTE. AJAY PRABANJAN, KODATI. ESWAR TEJA},
      title = {PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK ROUTING PROTOCOLS},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {1},
      number = {8},
      pages = {117-123},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1700224.pdf},
      abstract = {Background/Objectives: Wireless Sensor Network consists of a large number of sensor nodes that are randomly deployed in inaccessible areas where battery replacement or recharging is not possible. Hence energy consumption is a major issue in these networks. Clustering is a key technique that increases the battery lifetime. The sensor networks can be homogeneous or heterogeneous. In heterogeneous network, the nodes have different resource heterogeneity like

link and computation and energy. Lot of work has been done on energy heterogeneity to increase the network lifetime. Methods/Statistical Analysis: This paper analyses the two level energy heterogeneity protocols. The two level energy

heterogeneity protocols with normal and advance nodes prove to have better network lifetime and stability period than the homogeneous protocols like LEACH. Findings: Out of the heterogeneous protocols, ZSEP has better network lifetime,

throughput and stability period than SEP and DEEC. But though the lifetime of LEACH is higher than SEP, the protocol has smaller stability period and throughput. Improvements/Applications: LEACH is a homogeneous protocol while SEP, ZSEP,

DEEC are heterogeneous protocols. This paper analyzes the performance of LEACH, SEP, ZSEP and DEEC. Heterogeneous networks are used to monitor hostile environments with longer network lifetime and stability period.
},
      keywords = {Clustering, Energy Efficient, Heterogeneity, Network Lifetime, Wireless Sensor Network},
      month = {February},
  }