A Novel Approach For Estimating Concept Semantic Similarity In Knowledge Graph

References

[1] J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath, "Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy," in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Res.Comput. Linguistics, 1997, Art. No. 15.

[2] K. Bollacker, C. Evans, P. Paritosh, T. Sturge, and J. Taylor, "Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database forstructuring human knowledge," in Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management ofdata. ACM, 2008, pp. 1247- 1250.

[3] Corley, C.; Mihalcea, R. Measuring the semantic similarity of texts. In Proceedings of the ACLWorkshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,30 June 2005; pp. 13–18.

[4] Mihalcea, R.; Corley, C.; Strapparava, C. Corpus-based and knowledge -based measures oftext semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on ArtificialIntelligence, Boston, MA, USA, 16–20 July 2006; Volume 21, pp. 775–780.

[5] R. Navigli and S. P. Ponzetto, "Babelnet: The automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 193, pp. 217-250, 2012.

[6] J. Hoffart, F. M. Suchanek, K. Berberich, and G. Weikum, "Yago2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge basefrom Wikipedia (extended abstract)," in Proceedings of the Twenty -Third International Joint Conference on ArtificialIntelligence, ser. IJCAI ’13. AAAI Press, 2013, pp. 3161-3165.

[7] Prof. M. Schuhmacher and S. P. Ponzetto, "Knowledge-based graphdocument modeling," in Proc. 7th ACM Int. Conf. Web Search DataMining, 2014, pp. 543-552.

[8] S. Shekarpour, E. Marx, A.-C. N. Ngomo, and S. Auer, "Sina: Semantic interpretation of user queries for question answering oninterlinked data," Web Semantics: Sci. Services Agents World WideWeb, vol. 30, pp. 39-51, 2015.

[9] P. Resnik, "Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy," in Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conf. Artif.Intell., 1995, pp. 448-453.

[10] P. D. Turney and P. Pantel, "From frequency to meaning: Vectorspace models of semantics," J. Artif. Intell.Res. vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 141-188, 2010.

[11] Ballatore, A.; Bertolotto, M.; Wilson, D. The semantic similarity ensemble. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014,

[12] Landauer, T.; McNamara, D.; Dennis, S.; Kintsch, W. Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2007.

[13] Turney, P. Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In Proceedings of the12th European Conference on Machine Learning, ECML’01, Freiburg, Germany, 5–7 September,2001; Volume 2167, pp. 491–502.

[14] M. Dragoni, C. da Costa Pereira, and A. G. Tettamanzi, "A conceptual representation of documents and queries for informationretrieval systems by using light ontologies," Expert Syst. Appl.,vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 10376-10388, 2012.

[15] R. Rada, H. Mili, E. Bicknell, and M. Blettner, "Development andapplication of a metric on semantic nets," IEEE Trans. Syst. ManCybernetics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17-30, Jan./Feb. 1989.

[16] C. Leacock and M. Chodorow, "Combining local context andWordNet similarity for word sense identification," WordNet: Electron. Lexical Database, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 265-283, 1998.

[17] Z. Wu and M. Palmer, "Verbs semantics and lexical selection," inProc. 32nd Annu.Meeting Assoc. Compute.Linguistics, 1994, pp. 133-138.

@article{1700602,
      author = {PANCHUMARTHY GOPICHAND, B.SAI JYOTHI},
      title = {A Novel Approach For Estimating Concept Semantic Similarity In Knowledge Graph},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {1},
      number = {10},
      pages = {101-104},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1700602.pdf},
      abstract = {This paper gives a way to evaluate the semantic similarity between models in Knowledge Graphs (KGs) which wires Word Net and DBpedia. Past work on semantic equivalence systems have focused on either the structure of the semantic gathering among measures (e.g. Heading period and constrain), or just on the Information Content (IC) of models. We recommend a semantic likeness methodology, specifically w way, to solidify these two procedures, the usage of IC to weight the most concise way time period among musings. General corpus-basically based IC is handled from the transports of considerations over printed corpus that is required to set up a site corpus containing remarked on benchmarks and has extreme computational charge. As cases are starting at now isolated from scholarly corpus and elucidated through considerations in KGs, graph based completely IC is proposed to enroll IC essentially in light of the disseminations of thoughts over events. Through tests accomplished on extensively saw articulation resemblance datasets, we demonstrate that the wpath semantic likeness methodology has conveyed quantifiably full-gauge change over other semantic similarity procedures. Additionally, in an honest to goodness grouping make examination, the w way system has exhibited the five star executions with respect to precision and F rating.},
      keywords = {Semantic Relatedness, Semantic Similarity, Information Content, Word Net, Knowledge Graph, DBpedia},
      month = {April},
  }