AN ENHANCED PACKET MARKING AND TRACEBACK ALGORITHM FOR IP TRACEBACK

References

[1] P. Ferguson, D. Senie, Network ingress filtering: defeating denial of service at-tacks which employ ip source address spoofing (BCP 38), 2000. http://tools. ietf.org/html/rfc2827 (accessed 19 February 2018).

[2] R. Stone, Centertrack: an IP overlay network for tracking DoS floods, in: Pro-ceedings of the 9th conference on USENIX Security Symposium (SSYM’00), Denver, Colorado, 2000.

[3] M. Alajeely, R. Doss, A. Ahmad, V. Mak- Hau, Catabolism attack and anabolism defense: a novel attack and traceback mechanism in opportunistic networks, Comput. Commun. 71 (2015) 111–118.

[4] P. Wanga, H.T. Linb, T.S. Wangb, An improved ant colony system algorithm for solving the IP traceback problem, Inf. Sci. 326 (2016) 172–187.

[5] H. Burch, B. Cheswick, Tracing anonymous packets to their approximate source, in: Proceedings of USENIX Security Symposium, LISA, San Diego, CA, June 2000.

[6] S. Bellovin, et al., ICMP Traceback Messages, IETF Internet Draft, Version 4, 2003 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf- itrace-04 (accessed 19 February 2018).

[7] S. Saurabh, A.S. Sairam, ICMP based IP trace back with negligible overhead for highly distributed reflector attack using bloom filters, Comput. Commun. 42 (2014) 60–69.

[8] G. Yao, J. Bi, A.V. Vasilakos, Passive IP traceback: disclosing the locations of IP spoofers from path backscatter, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 10 (2015) 471–484.

[9] M.H. Yang, M.C. Yang, RIHT: a novel hybrid IP traceback scheme, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 7 (2012) 789–797.

[10] R. Chen, J.M. Park, R. Marchany, RIM: Router interface marking for IP traceback, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM ’06), San Fransisco, California, November 2006, pp 1–5.

[11] S. Malliga, A. Tamilarasi, A hybrid scheme using packet marking and logging for IP traceback, Int. J. Internet Protocol Technol. 5 (2010) 81–91.

[12] S. Malliga, A. Tamilarasi, A proposal for new marking scheme with its per-formance evaluation for IP traceback, WSEAS Trans. Comput. Res. 3 (2008) 259–272.

[13] M. Kamaldeep, M. Malik, M. Dutta, Implementation of single-packet hybrid IP traceback for IPv4 and IPv6 networks, IET Inf. Secur. 12 (2018) 1–6, ifs.2015.0483.

@article{1701163,
      author = {T.Mythili, S.Noorjahan, Dr.S.Malliga},
      title = {AN ENHANCED PACKET MARKING AND TRACEBACK ALGORITHM FOR IP TRACEBACK},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {2},
      number = {10},
      pages = {300-305},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1701163.pdf},
      abstract = {Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack is a major threat in today's world. Attackers hide their identity by spoofing and defending. An idea of an enhanced packet marking and trace back algorithm for ip traceback to identify an attacker that facilitates the traceback of the spoofed packet to its origin. Numerous ip traceback techniques exist, but they have limitations like the number of packets required or storage computational overheads incurred at routers. The technique proposed reduces computational time. The efficacy of the proposed scheme is compared to that of other single-packet traceback schemes in terms of computational time, storage, accuracy.},
      keywords = {IP Spoofing, DoS / DDoS, IP Trace back, Packet marking and logging, trace back},
      month = {April},
  }