Home / Current Issue / Paper 1702698
Comparative Study of RC Structure with and without Shear Wall
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Structural Engineering
Abstract
India at present is fast growing economy, which brings about demands in increase of infrastructure facilities along with the growth of population. To cater the land demand in these regions, vertical development is the only option. This type of development brings challenges to counteract additional lateral loads due to wind and earthquake. Recent days, structures are becoming more and more slender and susceptible to sway and hence dangerous in the earthquake. Many reinforced concrete buildings in urban regions lying in active seismic zone ,may suffer moderate to severe damages during ground motions After many practical studies it has shown that use of lateral load resisting systems in the building configuration has tremendously improved the performance of the structure in earthquake. Shear walls are mainly flexural members and usually provided in high rise buildings to avoid the total collapse of the building. Shear walls are extensively used in the buildings to resist lateral loads induced by earthquake.[2] In the present study an unsymmetrical (G+15) RC structure were analyzed using ETAB 2016, without and with shear wall at FireDuct-Lift, Shear wall at Corners and Shear Wall at FireDuct-Lift-Corners for parameters viz Maximum Storey Displacement and Drift. The structure with shear wall at FireDuct-Lift-Corners was found to be more stable and maximum percentage reduction in story displacement and drift was found out 59.24, 29.58, 62.15 and 35.70, 29.09, 100 percent respectively as compared with other positions of shear wall.
Keywords
Maximum Displacement, Maximum Story Drift, Shear Wall
References
[1] Chillu S Nandakumar and Nusra, “Comparative study of C & L shape shear wall in RC flat slab structure”, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064, Volume 6 Issue 6, June 2017.
[2] P. V. Sumanth Chowdary and Senthil Pandian. M, “A Comparative Study on RCC Structure with and without Shear Wall”, International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, ISSN (online): 2321-0613, Vol. 2, Issue 02, 2014.
[3] Satpute S G, “Comparative Study of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall analysis in multi-storeyed building with openings by Nonlinear Methods”, International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research, ISSN 2319 – 6009, Vol. 2, No. 3, August 2013.
[4] Akansha Dwivedi and B.S Tyagi, “Seismic Analysis of Building with and Without Shear Wall for Building with RCC and Composite Column”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, ISSN: 2278-0181, Vol. 9 Issue 06, June-2020.
[5] Deepna U, Arjun S Menon and S. Balamurugan, “A Comparative Study on Shear Wall Concept in Accordance to its Seismic Behavior”, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4):182-187, September 2018.
[6] Mohammad Noor Jan Ahmadi and Prof. Dr C. S. Sanghvi , “Comparative Study of Response of Irregular Structures and Effect of Shear Walls on Irregular Buildings”, International Journal of Advance Research, ISSN: 2320-5407, 2017.
[7] Mallika. K, Nagesh Kumar. G,” Analysis of Shear Wall in High Rise Unsymmetrical Building Using ETABS”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN(Online):2319-8753 ISSN(Print): 2347-6710, Vol.5, Issue 11, Nov 2016.
[8] O.Esmaili, S, Epackachi, M. Samadzad and S.R. Mirghaderi, “Study of Structural RC Shear Wall System in a 56-Story RC Tall Building” ,The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17,2008,Beijing.China.
[9] Varsha R. Harne, “Comparative Study of Strength of RC Shear Wall at Different Location on Multi-storied Residential Building, International Journal of Civil Engineering Research. ISSN 2278-3652 Vol.5 No.4(2014), pp.391-400.
How to cite this paper
@article{1702698,
author = {Bhushan M. Sawant, Siddhi M. Sawant, Sushant P. Varekar, Sayali S. Mandavkar, Dr. Amardeep D. Bhosale},
title = {Comparative Study of RC Structure with and without Shear Wall},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2021},
volume = {4},
number = {11},
pages = {57-62},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/17026981.pdf},
abstract = {India at present is fast growing economy, which brings about demands in increase of infrastructure facilities along with the growth of population. To cater the land demand in these regions, vertical development is the only option. This type of development brings challenges to counteract additional lateral loads due to wind and earthquake. Recent days, structures are becoming more and more slender and susceptible to sway and hence dangerous in the earthquake. Many reinforced concrete buildings in urban regions lying in active seismic zone ,may suffer moderate to severe damages during ground motions After many practical studies it has shown that use of lateral load resisting systems in the building configuration has tremendously improved the performance of the structure in earthquake. Shear walls are mainly flexural members and usually provided in high rise buildings to avoid the total collapse of the building. Shear walls are extensively used in the buildings to resist lateral loads induced by earthquake.[2] In the present study an unsymmetrical (G+15) RC structure were analyzed using ETAB 2016, without and with shear wall at FireDuct-Lift, Shear wall at Corners and Shear Wall at FireDuct-Lift-Corners for parameters viz Maximum Storey Displacement and Drift. The structure with shear wall at FireDuct-Lift-Corners was found to be more stable and maximum percentage reduction in story displacement and drift was found out 59.24, 29.58, 62.15 and 35.70, 29.09, 100 percent respectively as compared with other positions of shear wall.},
keywords = {Maximum Displacement, Maximum Story Drift, Shear Wall},
month = {May},
}