Role Of Public Administration in COVID-19

References

[1] Andreoni, A., Chang, H.J. and Estevez, I., 2019. 4. New Global Rules, Policy Space, and Quality of Growth in Africa (pp. 111-145). Columbia University Press.

[2] Bouckaert, G., Galli, D., Reiter, R., Kulhmann, S., & Van Hecke, S. (2020). Euroepan Coronationalism. A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis. doi, 10.

[3] Bria, F., 2020. Towards a Digital Green New Deal: A European Alliance on Digital Sovereignty to Reconquer Democratic Control of Data and to Put Tech and Innovation at the Service of People and the Green Transition. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Medium blog, available at https://medium. com/@ francescabria/towards-a-digital-green-new-deal-a-europeanalliance-on-digital-sovereignty-to-reconquer-ae783ff2cbd5.

[4] Buchanan, J.M., 2003. Public choice: politics without romance. [Article reprinted from Imprimus, Mar 2003.]. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 19(3), pp.13-18.

[5] Times, F., 2020. How Germany got Coronavirus right.

[6] Cordella, A. and Paletti, A., 2019. Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), p.101409.

[7] Spatscheck, C., 2021. Radical help–how we can remake the relationships between us and revolutionise the welfare state: by Hilary Cottam, London, Virago, 2019, 320 pp., ISBN-13: 978-0349009094, ISBN-10: 0349009090 (paperback).

[8] Mazzucato, M. and Kattel, R., 2020. COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), pp. S256-S269.

[9] Drechsler, W., 2005. The rise and demise of the new public management. Post-autistic economics review, 33(14), pp.17-28.

[10] Drechsler, W. and Kattel, R., 2009. Conclusion: Towards the neo-Weberian state? Perhaps, but certainly adieu, NPM. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), pp.95-99.

[11] Drechsler, W. and Kattel, R., 2020. Debate: The developed civil servant—providing agility and stability at the same time. Public Money & Management, 40(8), pp.549-551.

[12] Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Tinkler, J., 2006. New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16(3), pp.467-494.

[13] Garside, J. and Neate, R., 2020. UK government using pandemic to transfer NHS duties to private sector. The Guardian, 4.

[14] Gaspar, V., Lam, R. and Raissi, M., 2020. Fiscal policies to contain the damage from COVID-19. IMF Blog, 15.

[15] Karo, E. and Kattel, R., 2014. Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 34(1), pp.80-102.

@article{1703097,
      author = {N. M. Kanakane},
      title = {Role Of Public Administration in COVID-19},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2022},
      volume = {5},
      number = {7},
      pages = {32-37},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1703097.pdf},
      abstract = {Coronavirus pandemic has saved no country. However, the level of contamination and subsequent passings have contrasted limitlessly. There is, at this point, no logical clarification dependent on climatic or hereditary contrasts in populaces. Notwithstanding, there is by all accounts an arising agreement that public administration matters. This article takes a gander at three biggest nations in the World and finds that results in India, estimated as far as passings from COVID-19 infection, are a negligible portion of passings contrasted with other two huge crowded nations and seems, by all accounts, to be an anomaly. This article inspects the public administration reaction of a majority rule government and attracts examples for successful public administration managing other great public administration difficulties of our times.},
      keywords = {New Public Management, Performance Management, India, COVID-19, Coronavirus Pandemic, Government Performance Management},
      month = {January},
  }