Home / Current Issue / Paper 1703337
Quantitative Analysis of The Effect of Organic Additive (Cymbopogon Citratus) on the Production of Biogas
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Renewable Energy
Abstract
This study is a quantitative analysis of the effect of organic additives (Cymbopogon citratus) on the production of biogas. The substrates (cow dung, poultry droppings) was mixed in ratio 1:1 while addition of additive to substrates was maintained in ratio 1:4. Also, the water to substrate ratio was 1:1.4 to result in a total slurry content of 6 litres. At the end of the first 7 days of the experiment, a total of 357.4ml of biogas had been collected at an average of 51.06ml per day. At the end of another round of 7 days, 346.9ml of biogas was realized with an average of 50.7ml per day. One end of the hose was connected to the digester gas outlet located at the top of the digester and the other end of the hose (rubber) was connected to a graduated flask for gas collection and measurement. At the end of the study, it was observed that Cymbopogon citratus is not a good additive for the production of biogas. The yield (biogas) was reduced on the addition of the additive to the substrate for the production of biogas. The reason for this inhibition is due to the relatively undigested state of the additives compared to the substrates.
Keywords
Organic Additive, Substrate, Biogas, Digester, Poultry droppings, and Cow dung
References
[1] Nigeria Bureau of Statistics. NBS. 2009. Social Statistics in Nigeria available on http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/ext/latest_release/ssd09.pdf.
[2] Basic Concept and Applications. Thakur, I S. [ed.] Ik International Pvt Ltd. New Delhi : s.n., 2006, Environmental Biotechnology.
[3] Biogas Technology Research in Selected Sub-Saharan Africa. Mshandete, A M and Parawira, w. 2, 2009, African Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 8, pp. 116-125. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB.
[4] Wind Speed Distribution and Characteristics in Nigeria. Adaramola, M S and Oyewole, O M. 2, 2011, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 6.
[5] Alfa, M I. Comparative Production and Utilization of Biogas for Cooking, Using Cow Dung, Chicken Droppings, Cymbopogoncitratus(lemon grass). Ahmadu Bello University. 2013. MSc Thesis Presented to the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering.
[6] Monnet, F. An Introduction to Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste. Remade. Scotland : s.n., 2003. available on http://www.remade.org.uk/media/9102/an introduction to anaerobic digestion, nov 2003.pdf.
[7] Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources; An Introduction. Deublein, M and Steinhauser, E. 4, s.l. : Wiley-VCH VerlagGnbH& Co KGaA.Weiheim, 2008 , Vol. 5, pp. 475-486.
[8] Biogas and Waste Recycling. Maramba, S R. 1978. available on http://www.pcierd.dost.gov.ph/index.php/downloads/.../81-biogas-history.
[9] Fulford, D. Biogas Technology: Success Projects in Asia and Africa. 2011. Presentation at Kingdom Bio Energy. available at http://www.kingdombio.com/DJF Biogas Reading presentation.pdf.
[10] Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth using poultry litter as inoculum . Int. J. Patil, J H, et al., et al. 2, 2012, Environmental Science Development, Vol. 3, pp. 94-98.
[11] Ocwieja, S M. Life Cycle Thinking Assessment Applied to Three Biogas. Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technology. Central Uganda : s.n., 2010. Projects in , being A Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Engineering .
[12] Verma, S. Anaerobic Digestion of Biodegradable Organics in Municipal Solid Wastes. Colombia University. s.l. : Unpublished Fu Foundation School of Engineering & Applied Science, 2002 . M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering.
[13] Monnet, F. An Introduction to Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste. Remade. Scotland : s.n., 2003.
[14] Production of Biogas and Compost from Cow Dung in Zaria, Nigeria, . Igboro, S B. Zaria Nigeria : Ahmadu Bello University, 2011, PhD Dissertation Presented to the Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering.
[15] Comparing Different Biogas Upgrading Technologies. Hullu, J D. 10, 2008, Vol. 19, pp. 919-928.
[16] Methane Fermentation of cattle manure. Zennaki, B Z, et al., et al. 4, 2000, Effects of HRT, temperature & substrate concentration.Tropicultural, Vol. 14, pp. 134-140.
[17] Widodo, T W and Hendriadi, A. Development of Biogas for Small Scale Cattle Farm. 2005. pp. 18-20, International Seminar on Biogas technology for Sustainable Development.
[18] Biogas as Renewable Energy Source in Nepal: Theory and Development. Karki, A B, Shrestha, N J and Bajgain, S. [ed.] BSP. Nepal, . : s.n., 2005. Obtainable on www.snvworld.org.
[19] Shrestha, A. Prospects of Biogas in Terms of Sco-Economic and Environmental Benefits to Rural Community of Nepal. A Case of Biogas Project in. A Dissertation Submitted to , College of Applied Sciences-Nepal. Kathmandu : Gaikhur VDC of Gorkha District, 2010.
[20] Mata, Alvarez J. Biomethanization of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. s.l. : IWA Publishing, 2003.
[21] Energy recovery from wastes. Trujillo, D, Perez, J F and Cerebros, F J. [ed.] Bioresour Technology. 2, 2001 , Anaerobic digestion of tomato plant mixed with rabbit wastes, Vol. 45, pp. 81-83.
[22] Khanna, S and Somayaji, D. 5, 2000, Biomethanation of rice and wheat straw.WorldJ.Microbiol.Biotechnology, Vol. 10, pp. 521-523.
[23] Improvement in bio methanation of mango processing wastes by addition of plant derived additives Biogas Forum III. Babu, K S, et al., et al. 1994, Vol. 58, pp. 16-19.
[24] Shimizu, C. 1992, Holding anaerobic bacteria in digestion tank. JP Patent 4341398.
[25] Nickel as an accelerator of biogas production in water hyacinth (EichorniacrassipesSolns.). Geeta, G S, Jagadeesh, K S and Reddy, T K. 1990, Biomass, Vol. 21, pp. 157-161.
[26] Effects of carbon and nitrogen ratio on rice straw biomethanation. Bardiya, N and Gaur, A C. 1-4, 1997, Journal on Rural Energy, Vol. 4, pp. 1-16.
[27] Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Five Substrates. Ojolo, S J, Dinrifo, R R and Adesuyi, K B. s.l. : Trans Tech, 2007, Advanced Materials Research Journal, Vols. 18-19, pp. 519-525. Switzerland online at http://www.scientific.net.
How to cite this paper
@article{1703337,
author = {Adeleye Samson A, Ojo Akindele David},
title = {Quantitative Analysis of The Effect of Organic Additive (Cymbopogon Citratus) on the Production of Biogas},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2022},
volume = {5},
number = {10},
pages = {87-98},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1703337.pdf},
abstract = {This study is a quantitative analysis of the effect of organic additives (Cymbopogon citratus) on the production of biogas. The substrates (cow dung, poultry droppings) was mixed in ratio 1:1 while addition of additive to substrates was maintained in ratio 1:4. Also, the water to substrate ratio was 1:1.4 to result in a total slurry content of 6 litres. At the end of the first 7 days of the experiment, a total of 357.4ml of biogas had been collected at an average of 51.06ml per day. At the end of another round of 7 days, 346.9ml of biogas was realized with an average of 50.7ml per day. One end of the hose was connected to the digester gas outlet located at the top of the digester and the other end of the hose (rubber) was connected to a graduated flask for gas collection and measurement. At the end of the study, it was observed that Cymbopogon citratus is not a good additive for the production of biogas. The yield (biogas) was reduced on the addition of the additive to the substrate for the production of biogas. The reason for this inhibition is due to the relatively undigested state of the additives compared to the substrates.},
keywords = {Organic Additive, Substrate, Biogas, Digester, Poultry droppings, and Cow dung},
month = {April},
}