Home / Current Issue / Paper 1703540
Role of Managed Services for Network Security in K12
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Network Security
Abstract
This research explores the important contribution that managed services make to improving the performance and effectiveness of K12 institutions. Due to rapid technological advances, K12 institutions struggle with the issues of resources and technological assets, IT governance, and learning design. Managed services can also be considered a strategic solution for businesses seeking specialized services, flexibility and reasonable cost. This study will discuss managed services with a clear perspective on how they resolve these issues, illustrating how they shape infrastructure management, data protection, and pedagogy. The qualitative research- the qualitative interviews with educational leaders- was complemented by quantitative methods whereby performance data from K12 institutions using managed services was analyzed. This research shows that institutions with managed services gain value-added results and benefits in IT service availability, data control, and technology implementation for students. Further, the study also shows that managed services provide a way of moving from a reactive scenario to a proactive approach, helping institutions concentrate on their core mandate of educating the population. The idea of the present research is significant for policymakers, school managers, and managed service suppliers. Through managed services, K12 institutions are thus able to run efficiently and, at the same time, meet the dynamic challenges of the educational system. This study shows a need for strategic partnership between educational stakeholders and managed service providers to increase Enduring, technologically aged educational approaches.
Keywords
Managed services, K12 institutions, technology integration, education, operational efficiency, data security, pedagogical innovation, proactive management, educational outcomes, resource optimization
References
[1] Abomhara, M., & Køien, G. M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks. Journal of Cyber Security, 4(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[2] Akhtar, N., Azeem, S., & Mir, G. (2014). Strategic role of internet in SMEs growth strategies. International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research, 5(2), 20–27.
[3] Alavi, R., Islam, S., & Mouratidis, H. (2016). An information security risk-driven investment model for analysing human factors. Information and Computer Security, 24(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[4] Aldawood, H., & Skinner, G. (2019). Reviewing cyber security social engineering training and awareness programs—Pitfalls and ongoing issues. Future Internet, 11(3), 73. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[5] Aleroud, A., & Zhou, L. (2017). Phishing environments, techniques, and countermeasures: A survey. Computers & Security, 68, 160–196. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[6] Alhogail, A., Mirza, A., & Bakry, S. H. (2015). A comprehensive human factor framework for information security in organizations. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 78(2), 201–211.
[7] Al Kalbani, A., Deng, H., Kam, B., & Zhang, X. (2017). Information security compliance in organizations: An institutional perspective. Data and Information Management, 1(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[8] Aloul, F. A. (2012). The need for effective information security awareness. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 3(3), 177–183. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[9] Ani, U. D., He, H., & Tiwari, A. (2019). Human factor security: Evaluating the cybersecurity capacity of the industrial workforce. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(1), 2–35. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[10] Arachchilage, N. A. G., Love, S., & Beznosov, K. (2016). Phishing threat avoidance behaviour: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 185–197. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[11] Arlitsch, K., & Edelman, A. (2014). Staying safe: Cyber security for people and organizations. Journal of Library Administration, 54(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[12] Armerdeing, T. (2014). Security training is lacking: Here are tips on how to do it better. CSO Online. Retrieved from https://www.csoonline.com/article/2362793/security-leadership/security-training-is-lacking-here-are-tips-on-how-to-do-it-better.html
[13] Atkinson, S., Furnell, S., & Phippen, A. (2009). Securing the next generation: Enhancing e-safety awareness among young people. Computer Fraud & Security, 2009(7), 13–19. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[14] Bathon, J. (2013). How little data breaches cause big problems for schools. THE Journal, 40(10), 26–29.
[15] Ben-Asher, N., & Gonzalez, C. (2015). Effects of cyber security knowledge on attack detection. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 51–61. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[16] Bialaszewski, D. (2015). Information security in education: Are we continually improving? Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 12, 45–54. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[17] Bordoff, S., Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2017). Cyber-attacks, contributing factors, and tackling strategies: The current status of the science of cybersecurity. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 7(4), 68–82. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
[18] Chen, I. (2014). School districts stumbled on data privacy. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Crisis management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1346–1348). IGI Global.
[19] Chen, I. L., & Shen, L. (2016). The cyberethics, cybersafety, and cybersecurity at schools. International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education (IJCEE), 4(1), 1–15.
[20] Chen, I. L., & Shen, L. (2019). Cybercitizens at schools. In A. Blackburn, I. Linlin Chen, & R. Pfeffer (Eds.), Emerging trends in cyber ethics and education (pp. 91–117). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[21] Chou, H. L., & Chou, C. (2016). An analysis of multiple factors relating to teachers’ problematic information security behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 334–345.
[22] Chu, A. M. Y., Chau, P. Y. K., & So, M. K. P. (2015). Explaining the misuse of information systems resources in the workplace: A dual-process approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 209–225.
[23] Coleman, C. D., & Reeder, E. (2018, March). Three reasons for improving cybersecurity instruction and practice in schools. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1020–1025). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[24] Conteh, N. Y., & Schmick, P. J. (2016). Cybersecurity: Risks, vulnerabilities and countermeasures to prevent social engineering attacks. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 6(23), 31.
[25] Craigen, D., Diakun-Thibault, N., & Purse, R. (2014). Defining cybersecurity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(10), 13–21.
[26] D’Arcy, J., & Lowry, P. B. (2017). Cognitive‐affective drivers of employees’ daily compliance with information security policies: A multilevel, longitudinal study. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 43–69.
[27] Da Veiga, A. (2019). Achieving a security culture. In I. Vasileiou & S. Furnell (Eds.), Cybersecurity education for awareness and compliance (pp. 72–100). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[28] Davis, D. (2018, March). Best practices for balancing technology use and safety in a modern school. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1026–1030). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[29] Esteves, J., Ramalho, E., & De Haro, G. (2017). To improve cybersecurity, think like a hacker. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(3), 71.
[30] Evans, M., He, Y., Maglaras, L., & Janicke, H. (2019). HEART-IS: A novel technique for evaluating human error-related information security incidents. Computers & Security, 80, 74–89.
[31] Evans, M., Maglaras, L. A., He, Y., & Janicke, H. (2016). Human behaviour as an aspect of cybersecurity assurance. Security and Communication Networks, 9(17), 4667–4679.
[32] Chaudhary, A. A. (2022). Asset-Based Vs Deficit-Based Esl Instruction: Effects On Elementary Students Academic Achievement And Classroom Engagement. Migration Letters, 19(S8), 1763-1774.
How to cite this paper
@article{1703540,
author = {Himmat Rathore},
title = {Role of Managed Services for Network Security in K12},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2022},
volume = {5},
number = {12},
pages = {340-352},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1703540.pdf},
abstract = {This research explores the important contribution that managed services make to improving the performance and effectiveness of K12 institutions. Due to rapid technological advances, K12 institutions struggle with the issues of resources and technological assets, IT governance, and learning design. Managed services can also be considered a strategic solution for businesses seeking specialized services, flexibility and reasonable cost. This study will discuss managed services with a clear perspective on how they resolve these issues, illustrating how they shape infrastructure management, data protection, and pedagogy.
The qualitative research- the qualitative interviews with educational leaders- was complemented by quantitative methods whereby performance data from K12 institutions using managed services was analyzed. This research shows that institutions with managed services gain value-added results and benefits in IT service availability, data control, and technology implementation for students. Further, the study also shows that managed services provide a way of moving from a reactive scenario to a proactive approach, helping institutions concentrate on their core mandate of educating the population.
The idea of the present research is significant for policymakers, school managers, and managed service suppliers. Through managed services, K12 institutions are thus able to run efficiently and, at the same time, meet the dynamic challenges of the educational system. This study shows a need for strategic partnership between educational stakeholders and managed service providers to increase Enduring, technologically aged educational approaches.},
keywords = {Managed services, K12 institutions, technology integration, education, operational efficiency, data security, pedagogical innovation, proactive management, educational outcomes, resource optimization},
month = {June},
}