Home / Current Issue / Paper 1703587
Power System Security Assessment
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Electrical Engineering
Abstract
A broad overview of on-line power system security analysis is provided, with the intent of identifying areas needing additional research and development. Current approaches to state estimation are reviewed and areas needing improvement, such as external system modelling, are discussed. On-line contingency selection has become practical, particularly for static security. Additional work is necessary to identify better indices of power system stress to be used in on-line screening filters for both static and dynamic security analysis. Near interruptions (emergencies) without interruption of customer service. It is related to system robustness in nearby disturbances, therefore, depending on the operating system and the potential for interference. Historically, ensuring safe operation has been a key factor in the safe and economical operation of energy systems. If the system has an insufficient level of security, it becomes extremely dangerous and, in some cases, catastrophic, systemic failures of the most recently observed species on various power grids around the world, events with significant economic costs and potentially even losses. of life.
Keywords
Power System Security Assessment, Security Control SCADA , Dynamic Security Assessment
References
[1] CIGRE Tech. Brochure, no. 231, 2003. U.S.- Canada Power System Outage Task Force, “Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and recommendations,” Apr. 2004.
[2] K. Morison, L. Wang, P. Kundur, X. Lin, W. Gao, C. He, F. Xue, J. Xu, T. Xu, and Y. Xue, “Critical requirements for successful online security assessment,” presented at the IEEE PES PSC&E Conf., New York, Oct. 10–13, 2004.
[3] R. Avila-Rosales, A. Sadjadpour, M. Gibescu, K. Morison,H. Hamadani, and L. Wang, “ERCOT’s implementation of online dynamic security assessment,” presented at the Panel Session of the IEEE PES 2003 General Meeting, Toronto, Ont., Canada, July 13–17, 2003.
[4] K. Morison, “Future directions: Online dynamic security assessment using intelligent systems,” presented at the Panel Session on Power System Security in the New Market Environ- ment, IEEE PES Summer Power Meeting, New York, July 2002.
[5] J.A. Huang, A. Valette, M. Beau Morison, A. Moshref, M. Provencher, and J. Sun, “An intelligent sys- tem for advanced dynamic security assessment,” in Proc. PowerCon 2002, Kunming, China, Oct. 2002 [CD-ROM].
[6] K. Morison, H. Hamadani, and L. Wang, “Practical issues in load modeling for voltage stability studies,” presented at the Panel Session of the IEEE PES 2003 General Meeting, Toronto, Ont., Canada, July 13–17, 2003.
[7] Rocco, C.M.; Ramirez-Marquez, J.E.; Salazar, D.E.; Yajure, C. Assessing the Vulnerability of a Power System Through a Multiple Objective Contingency Screening Approach. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2011, 60, 394–403.
[8] Ding, T.; Li, C.; Yan, C.; Li, F.; Bie, Z. A Bilevel Optimization Model for Risk Assessment and Contingency Ranking in Transmission System Reliability Evaluation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2017, 32, 3803–3813.
[9] Street, A.; Oliveira, F.; Arroyo, J.M. Contingency-Constrained Unit Commitment with n–K Security Criterion: A Robust Optimization Approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2011, 26, 1581–1590.
[10] Wang, Q.; Watson, J.; Guan, Y. Two-stage robust optimization for N-k contingency- constrained unit commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 2366–2375.
[11] Levitin, G. Optimal Defense Strategy Against Intentional Attacks. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2007, 56, 148–157.
[12] Levitin, G.; Hausken, K. Redundancy vs. Protection vs. False Targets for Systems Under Attack. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2009, 58, 58–68.
[13] Ejebe, G.C.; Wollenberg, B.F. Automatic Contingency Selection. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1979, PAS-98, 97–109.
How to cite this paper
@article{1703587,
author = {Harshdeep, Vishal V. Mehtre},
title = {Power System Security Assessment},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2022},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {37-44},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1703587.pdf},
abstract = {A broad overview of on-line power system security analysis is provided, with the intent of identifying areas needing additional research and development. Current approaches to state estimation are reviewed and areas needing improvement, such as external system modelling, are discussed. On-line contingency selection has become practical, particularly for static security. Additional work is necessary to identify better indices of power system stress to be used in on-line screening filters for both static and dynamic security analysis. Near interruptions (emergencies) without interruption of customer service. It is related to system robustness in nearby disturbances, therefore, depending on the operating system and the potential for interference. Historically, ensuring safe operation has been a key factor in the safe and economical operation of energy systems. If the system has an insufficient level of security, it becomes extremely dangerous and, in some cases, catastrophic, systemic failures of the most recently observed species on various power grids around the world, events with significant economic costs and potentially even losses. of life.},
keywords = {Power System Security Assessment, Security Control SCADA , Dynamic Security Assessment},
month = {July},
}