Competency Level of Technical Faculty in Aircraft Maintenance Technology Program in Selected University and Colleges

References

[1] U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation (2016). Aviation Instructor’s Handbook

[2] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Approved Training Organization Manual. (2021)

[3] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines, Advisory Circular AC 02-018 Skill Test Standards: Aircraft Maintenance Technician (2013) B. Unpublished

[4] Sierra, Francia G. Teaching Competencies of Engineering Faculty in Selected Public and Private Colleges and Universities in the National Capital Region: An Assessment. Master’s thesis, Philippine State College of Aeronautics-Pasay.

[5] Devaras, Gregorio M. Training Needs Assessment of the Technical Faculty of the Philippine State College of Aeronautics Mactan Benito Ebuen Air Base Campus: Basis for the Formulation on an Improved Training and Development Program. Research Study, Philippine State College of Aeronautics-Pasay.

[6] Ilao, Antonio M. Philippine State College of Aeronautics and Lufthansa Technik Philippines Academe- Industry Linkage Program. Master’s thesis, Philippine State College of Aeronautics- Pasay.

[7] Timajo, Louie L. Marketing Program for Philippine State College of Aeronautics Flying School. Master’s thesis, Philippine State College of Aeronautics-Pasay.

[8] Doso, Florante C. Level of Competence of Filipino Civil Engineers in Northern Samar: its prospect for employment and implication for Curricular Circular Improvements. Master’s thesis, National Library.

[9] Miranda, Rohena Z. Level of Competence and the Performance in the Delivery of Services among the Staff of the Student Personnel Services. Master’s thesis, National Library.

[10] Mayuga, Maribel D. The Competency Level of Dental Practitioners regarding the Oral Management of Patient. Master’s thesis, National Library.

[11] Cristobal, Felanie R. Level of Competency and Performance of Astruzena Representative in Mindanao. Master’s thesis, National Library.

[12] C. Commercial On-Line Databases

[13] Jafar, D., Saud, M., Hamid, M., Suhairom, N., Hisham, M., & Zaid, Y. (2020). TVET Teacher Professional Competency Framework in Industry 4.0 Era. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Retrieved 26, July 2021 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0ebe/e144c6b5 6f9ec6a0ce4eb7c18fc49b2a2f6e.pdf

[14] Chen, J., & Zhang, J. (2016). Design collaborative formative assessment for sustained knowledge building using idea thread mapper. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences. (pp. 647-654).

[15] Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.

[16] DeBarger, A., Choppin, J., Beauvineau, Y., & Moorthy, S. (2014). Designing for productive adaptations of curriculum interventions. In B. J. Fishman, W. R. Penuel, A. R. Allen, & B. H. Cheng (Eds.), Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars (pp. 298–319). New York: Teachers College Press.

[17] Bereiter, C. (2010). How to make good knowledge-building discourse better. In Keynote address at the 2010 knowledge building summer institute. “New assessments and environments for knowledge building”, Toronto, Canada, August 3-6, 2010.

[18] Ertmer, P. A., Parisio, M. L., & Wardak, D. (2013). The practice of educational/instructional design. In R. Luckin, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, S. Puntambekar, N. Winters, & J. Underwood (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 5–19). New York: Routledge.

[19] Gosling, D. (2015). Collaborative peer- supported review of teaching. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, 9, 13–31.

[20] Haslir, M., Lee, T. C., Mohd, S. B., & Ling, L. Y. (2016). Understanding teacher’s principle- based practice in sustaining knowledge building practice in a science classroom. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1318-1321). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

[21] Kim, M. S. (2015). Empowering prospective teachers to become active sense-makers: Multimodal modeling of the seasons. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 610– 627. https://

[22] Mullins, D., Deiglmayr, A., & Spada, H. (2013). Motivation and emotion in shaping knowledge co-construction. In Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning (pp. 139–161).

[23] Pellegrino, J. (2014). A learning sciences perspective on the design and use of assessment in education. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 262–282). New York: Cambridge University Press.

[24] Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, D. J. (2017). Creating research practice partnerships in education. Boston: Harvard Education Press.

[25] Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514.

[26] Sawyer, K. (2011). What makes good teachers great? The artful balance of structure and improvisation. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 1–24). New York: Cambridge University Press.

@article{1704323,
      author = {Dr. Mark Louie A. Martin},
      title = {Competency Level of Technical Faculty in Aircraft Maintenance Technology Program in Selected University and Colleges},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {10},
      pages = {600-606},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704323.pdf},
      abstract = {Aircraft Maintenance Technology (AMT) is a highly specialized course that provides not only in theoretical aspects but also in practical side. Published studies have suggested that programs like AMT, which is anchored on the technical aspect of education, requires a great robust of the instructors by providing them an adequate, relevant and updated trainings to substantiate the theoretical knowledge with practical application of the students thus, making instructors competent.This study aimed to evaluate the level of competency of technical instructors in Aircraft Maintenance Technology in selected universities and colleges in terms of Classroom Management,Faculty Qualification and Experience, Mastery of the Subject Taught, Method and Strategy used in Teaching Instructional Methodologies, Research and Extension Projects. The investigation was basically a descriptive-normative survey method. Among the respondents were technical faculty members in selected colleges and universities. This includes 15 School Admin./ Program Coordinator and 120 Faculty. As a general result, it can be assessed that faculty members were competent across aforementioned variables thus, no significant difference exists. On the other hand, all the variables signify a significant relationship except to methods and strategy used in teaching instructional methodologies. With this, utilization of the proposed strategic modelis highly recommended to be conducted by the Deans and Chairpersons of AMT Department geared toward upgrading them the knowledge of new contents in the curriculum and familiarizing them with the state of the art in Aircraft Maintenance Technology pedagogy as well in the area of research and extension as it is deemed suitable, acceptable and feasible.},
      keywords = {Competency Level, Technical Faculty, Strategic Model, Theoretical, Practical},
      month = {April},
  }