Analysis of Factors Associated with Pedestrians? Crossing Behavior along MacArthur Highway, San Matias, Santo Tomas, Pampanga

References

[1] T. Ahmed, M. Moeinaddini, M. Almoshaogeh , A. Jamal, I. Nawaz, & F. Alharbi. (2021). “A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Online]. vol. 18, no. 6, p. 8813. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168813

[2] M. Abdullah, C. Dias, & T. Oguchi. (2021). “Road Crossing at Unmarked Mid-Block Locations: Exploring Pedestrians’ Perception and Behavior.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering [Online]. vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 1681-1698. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00701-z

[3] N. N. Ferenchak. (2016). “Pedestrian age and gender in relation to crossing behavior at midblock crossings in India.” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) [Online]. vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 345–351. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2015.12.001

[4] G. Asaithambi, M. O. Kuttan, & S. Chandra. (2016). “Pedestrian Road Crossing Behavior Under Mixed Traffic Conditions: A Comparative Study of an Intersection Before and After Implementing Control Measures.” Transportation in Developing Economies [Online]. vol. 2, no. 2. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-016-0018-5

[5] A. Dommes, M. Granié, M. Cloutier, C. Coquelet, & F. Huguenin-Richard. (2015). “Red light violations by adult pedestrians and other safety-related behaviors at signalized crosswalks.” Accident; Analysis and Prevention [Online], vol. 80. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.002

[6] K. Tian, G. Markkula, C. Wei, Y. M. Lee, R. Madigan, N. Merat, & R. Romano. (2022). “Explaining unsafe pedestrian road crossing behaviours using a Psychophysics-based gap acceptance model.” Safety Science, 154 [Online]. p. 105837. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105837

[7] B. R. Kadali, & P. Vedagiri. (2019). “Evaluation of pedestrian crossing speed change patterns at unprotected mid-block crosswalks in India.” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2018.10.010

[8] L. Govinda, & K. V. R. Ravishankar. (2022). “A critical review on pedestrian crossing behaviour and pedestrian-vehicle interactions.” Innovative Infrastructure Solutions [Online]. vol. 7, no. 5. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00917-6

[9] J. Arellana, S. Fernández, M. Figueroa, & V. Cantillo. (2022). “Analyzing pedestrian behavior when crossing urban roads by combining RP and SP data.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour [Online]. vol. 85, pp. 259-275. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.01.012

[10] C. Zhang, F. Chen, & Y. Wei. (2019). “Evaluation of pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks with different numbers of lanes in China.” Accident Analysis & Prevention [Online]. vol. 123, pp. 263–273. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.002

[11] S. Marisamynathan, & P. Vedagiri. (2019). “Pedestrian perception-based level-of-service model at signalized intersection crosswalks. Journal of Modern Transportation.” [Online]. vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 266–281. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-019-00196-5

[12] B. R. Kadali and P. Vedagiri. (2016). “Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [Online]. vol. 2581, no. 1, pp. 37–47. Available: https://doi.org/10.3141/2581-05.B.W.

[13] Landis, V. R. Vattikuti, R. M. Ottenberg, D. S. McLeod, & M. Guttenplan. (2013). “Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment: Pedestrian Level of Service.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [Online]. vol. 1773, no. 1, pp. 82–88.80. Available: https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/pedestrian-facility

[14] Z. Asadi-Shekari, M. Moeinaddini, & M. Zaly Shah. (2013). “Non-motorised Level of Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service.” Transport Reviews[Online]. vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 166–194. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.775613

[15] S. Bendak, A. M. Alnaqbi, M. Y. Alzarooni, S. M. Aljanaahi, & S. J. Alsuwaidi. (2021). “Factors affecting pedestrian behaviors at signalized crosswalks: An empirical study,” Journal of Safety Research [Online]. vol. 76, pp. 269–2750. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.019

[16] Z. Hacham & H. Hamid. (2022). “Study of Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at A Number of Unmarked Crossings in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,” Current Trends in Geotechnical Engineering and Construction [Online]. pp. 463–475. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7358-1_40

[17] D. Ridel, E. Rehder, M. Lauer, C. Stiller, & D. Wolf. (2018). “A Literature Review on the Prediction of Pedestrian Behavior in Urban Scenarios,” 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2018.8569415

[18] L. L. Thompson, F. P. Rivara, R. C. Ayyagari, & B. E. Ebel. (2012). “Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study,” Injury Prevention [Online]. vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 232–237. Available: https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601

[19] C. H. Basch, D. Ethan, P. Zybert, & C. E. Basch. (2015). “Pedestrian Behavior at Five Dangerous and Busy Manhattan Intersections,” Journal of Community Health [Online]. vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 789–792. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0001-9.

[20] B. J. Russo, E. James, C. Y. Aguilar, & E. J. Smaglik. (2018) “Pedestrian Behavior at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks: Observational Study of Factors Associated with Distracted Walking, Pedestrian Violations, and Walking Speed,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [Online]. vol. 2672, no. 35, pp. 1–12. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118759949

[21] E. Papadimitriou, S. Lassarre, & G. Yannis. (2017). “Human factors of pedestrian walking and crossing behaviour,” Transportation Research Procedia [Online]. vol. 25, pp. 2002–2015, 2017. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.396

[22] I. Etikan, S. A. Musa, & R. S. Alkassim. (2016). “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics [Online]. vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

[23] A. Gautam & C. Kumar. (2020). “Correlation,” Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior [Online]. pp. 1–4, Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_214-1

[24] N. Gogtay & U. Thatte. (2017). “Principles of Correlation Analysis.,” undefined [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Principles-of-Correlation-Analysis.-Gogtay-Thatte/412353eaa6232e4fb9241ed0275945ccdd6da9a9

[25] P. Bhandari & K. Nikolopoulou. (2020). “Designing and Analyzing a Likert Scale | What, Why and How,” Scribbr [Online]. Available: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/likert-scale/

[26] Laerd Statistics. (2018). “Spearman’s Rank-Order Correlation - A guide to when to use it, what it does and what the assumptions are.,” Laerd.com [Online]. Available: https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/spearmans-rank-order-correlation-statistical-guide.php

[27] J. Crosley. (2021). “What Is Thematic Analysis? Simple Definition + Examples.” Grad Coach [Online]. Available: https://gradcoach.com/what-is-thematic-analysis/77

@article{1704719,
      author = {James Zanchel S. Manaloto, Mac Karlo E. Alfonso,  Zyron Lander A. Delos Santos; Francis Ivan D. Hipolito, Henniel H. Pare?a; Gerald Ni?o P. Velasco, Benjamin O. Guiao; John Vincent G. Tongol},
      title = {Analysis of Factors Associated with Pedestrians? Crossing Behavior along MacArthur Highway, San Matias, Santo Tomas, Pampanga},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {12},
      pages = {710-722},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704719.pdf},
      abstract = {As the population continues to grow, a significant number of individuals rely on pedestrian crossings in their daily lives. However, people exhibit different behaviors when using such facilities, which can lead to traffic congestion and conflicts with other road users. Pedestrian behavior is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including pedestrians themselves, as well as traffic, road, and environmental characteristics. This study aims to explore the subjective factors underlying pedestrian crossing behavior at an unsignalized intersection along MacArthur Highway, San Matias, Santo Tomas, Pampanga. Through a review and collation of various studies, potential factors were identified and grouped into five main categories: pedestrians' attitudes, positive behaviors, negative behaviors, perceptions, and preferences. A survey questionnaire was utilized to gather data from 390 respondents, selected through convenience sampling. The questionnaire consisted of questions to be rated using Likert Scale responses. Correlation analysis revealed direct associations between pedestrians' positive and negative behaviors, as well as their preferences, with their crossing behavior. This finding emphasizes the importance of pedestrian behavior and preferences in determining safe crossing practices. Promoting safety awareness and responsible behavior among pedestrians can prove effective in improving pedestrian safety. Based on the results, recommendations are provided for both the local government and pedestrians. These recommendations include maintaining marked crosswalks, installing additional pedestrian crosswalks, implementing barricades and signage, ensuring adherence to traffic laws, and encouraging the proper utilization of pedestrian facilities.},
      keywords = {Pedestrian Behavior, Likert Scale, Marked Crosswalks, Traffic Laws, Pedestrian Facilities.},
      month = {June},
  }