Effectiveness of Aircraft Ground Operation Course in Enriching the Aircraft Maintenance Program

References

[1] Allen, J. M. (2012). Advisory Circular 120-16F: Air carrier maintenance program, Washington D.C: Federal Aviation Administration.

[2] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines. CAR Part 2 Personnel licensing (2014)

[3] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines. CAR Part 3 Approved Training Organizations (2011)

[4] Dictionary of Aeronautical Terms (2006) Aviation supplies and Academics, Inc. 7005 132nd Place SE Newcastle, Washington

[5] Lunenberge F., Ornstein A., “Concepts and Practices one’s worth: Belmont California”, Fourth Edition, 2004.

[6] Anders Halskov-Jensen (2014) “Aviation Training Forward”. ICAO Training Report

[7] BAA Training. (2017) “Why ground handling Team needs training” 2017-04-24.

[8] Boeing Market Outlook. “Pilot and Technician Outlook” (2019) 2019-2038

[9] Branon, Tommy (2019) “Aviation Maintenance Technology Program” Midland International Air and Space Port, Hangar E 2405 Windecker Street Midland, TX 79706

[10] Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2002). Science Instruction in the middle and Secondary schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[11] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Advisory Circulars 09-007. “Acceptable Ground Handling Arrangement”

[12] CHED Memorandum Orders (CMO No. 37, 2012) “Policies standards and Guidelines in Establishments of Outcome Based Education Institution

[13] Compton, B. (2019, December 29). Aircraft Inspections for Safety and Reliability [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/aircraft-inspections-for-safety-and-reliability/Offering Engineering Programs.”

[14] Dkeidek, I., Mamalok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A. (2012). Assessment of the laboratory learning environment in an inquiry-oriented chemistry laboratory in Arab and Jewish high schools in Israel. Learning Environments Research, 15, 141-169.

[15] Eilks, I., Prins, G. T., & Lazarowitz, R. (2013). How to organize the classroom in student – active mode. In I. Eikles & A. Hofstein (eds.). Teaching chemistry – A study book (pp. 183-212). Rotterdam: Sense.

[16] Esiobu, G. O., & Soyibo, K. (1995). Effects of concept and vee mappings under three learning modes on students’ cognitive achievement in ecology and genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 971-995.

[17] FAA Advisory Circulars. “Ground Vehicle Operations to include Taxiing or Towing an Aircraft on Airports” (2015)

[18] Fitouri-Trabelsi, S., Mora-Camino, F., Nunes-Cosenza, C. and Weigang, L. (2015). Integrated Decision Making for Ground Handling Management.

[19] Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: F Mathematics and Decision Sciences Gardner, M. (1978). Aha! Insight. New York: Scientific American.

[20] Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A.M.L., & Marek, E.A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environment, teaching procedure and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535-549.

[21] Gittens, A. (2013) “The Importance of Ground Handling Safety”

[22] Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V, N. (2004). The laboratory In science education: Foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.

[23] Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 971-789

[24] ICAO “Assembly-39th Session/Technical Commission. Montreal” 5th August 2016.

[25] Kozuba, J. & Bundaruk, A. (2014) “Flight Simulator as an essential device supporting the process of Shaping Pilot’s Situational Awareness”. International Conference of Scientific Paper AFACES 2014

[26] Laguador, J. M., & Dotong, C. I. (2014). Knowledge versus Practice on the Outcomes-Based Education Implementation of the Engineering Faculty Members in LPU. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(1), 63-74.

[27] Meagher, T. (2015) “Effective Training for Ground Operations necessary for Skill Set”.

[28] Nasrallah, R. (2014). Learning outcomes' role in higher education teaching. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 7(4), 257-276

[29] Radem, A. (2009). The effectiveness of lecture demonstration to enhance learning of chemistry. In GupaBhown, M. (Eds.), Chemistry education in ICT age. Dordrecht, Springer.

[30] R.Sethumadhavan (2013), effectiveness of training in auto component industry – an empirical study, volume no. 3 (2013), issue no. 02

[31] Tabares D.A, Camino F. (2017)” Aircraft ground handling: Analysis for automation”. 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Jun 2017, Denver, United States. 16 p.

[32] Teijeiro, M., Rungo, P., Freire, M. J. (2013). Graduate Competencies and Employability: The impact of matching firms’ needs and personal attainments, economics of education review, Volume 34:286-295

[33] Thompson, J., & Soyibo, K. (2002). Effects of lecture, teacher demonstrations, discussion, and practical work on 10th graders attitudes to chemistry and understanding of electrolysis. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 25-37.

[34] Barman, L., Bolander-Laksov, K., & Silén, C.(2014). Policy enacted – teachers' approaches to an outcome-based framework for course design. Teaching In Higher Education, 19(7), 735-746. Doi:10.1080/13562517

[35] Basheer, Hugerat et. al (2017) “The Effectiveness of Teachers' Use of Demonstrations for Enhancing Students' Understanding of and Attitudes to Learning the Oxidation-Reduction Concept”. EURASIA

[36] Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education ISSN: 1305-8223 (online) 1305-8215 (print) 2017.

[37] Buncick, M. C., Betts, P. G., & Horgan, D.D. (2001). Using demonstrations as a contextual road map: enhancing course continuity and promoting active in introductory college physics. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1237-1255

[38] De Guzman, Domingo, et.al (2017) Understanding the Essence of the Outcomes Based Education (OBE) and Knowledge of its Implementation in a Technological University in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 5 No.4, 64-71 November 2017 P-ISSN 2350-7756 E-ISSN 2350-8442

[39] Fanta, F., & Boubacar, I. (2016). EXPERIENTIAL Vs. LECTURE-BASED TEACHING: DOES THE CHOICE OF INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD MATTER? Journal Of Economics & Economic Education Research, 17(3), 60-73.

[40] Giridraha K., Raju R. (2017) “Impact of Teaching Strategies: Demonstration and Lecture Strategies and Impact of Teacher Effect on Academic Achievement in Engineering Education”. International Journal of Sciences Pages 174-186, published online: 25 Sep 2017

[41] Haq Nawaz, A., Malik, M., (2014) “Assessing the Learning Level of Student through Bloom’s Taxonomy in Higher Education in Punjab”, Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy Vol. 4 No. 3, ISSN 2239-978X ISSN 2240-0524

[42] Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 971-789.

[43] Meyar, L. S., Schmidt, S., Nozawa, F. & Paneee, D. (2003). Using demonstration to promote student comprehension in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(4), 431-435.

[44] Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management Print version ISSN 1984-9648On-line version ISSN 2175-9146

[45] Odom, A. L., & Bell, C. V. (2015). Association of middle school student science achievement and attitudes about science with student-reported frequency of teacher lecture demonstrations and students –centered learning. International Journal of Environment al & Science Education, 10 (1) 8797.

[46] Okpala, P., & Onocha, C. (1988). Difficult physics topics in Nigerian secondary schools. Physics Education, 23, 168-172.

[47] Shakhashiri, B. Z. (1983, 1985, 1989, 1992, 2011). Chemical Demonstration: a Handbook for Teacher of Chemistry. Vol. 1-5, Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

[48] Sweeder, R. D., & Jeffery, K. A. (2013). A comprehensive general chemistry demonstration. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 96-98.

[49] Tan, K. C. D., (2000). Development and application of diagnostic instrument to evaluate secondary students' conceptions of qualitative analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Curtin University of Technology.

[50] Takahashi S., Saito (2013) “Unraveling the process. and meaning of problem- based learning experiences Higher Education”

@article{1704991,
      author = {Juncen Vilado Gardose, Prof. Eunice Mareth Querol-Areola},
      title = {Effectiveness of Aircraft Ground Operation Course in Enriching the Aircraft Maintenance Program},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {563-579},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704991.pdf},
      abstract = {The demand for aviation maintenance technicians (AMT) is rapidly increasing and there is a need to provide as many as 769,000 over the next twenty20 years (Boeing, 2018). The program defined in this study is extra enrichment in bracing the delivery of aviation maintenance technology instruction. For the Aircraft Maintenance Technology (AMT) students of any aviation institution, an effective teaching method for a technical student should be given with hands-on training aside from theoretical knowledge for them to experience the actual learning process to maximize their skills and this will be a great help for their professional growth and development. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of aircraft ground operations in enriching the aircraft maintenance program. The participants of the study were composed of 35 AMT personnel and 25 AMT students which came from three (3) approved Maintenance Organization Company and one (1) approved Training Organization (Maintenance school) in Metro Manila. A four-point Likert scale was employed to survey the level of effectiveness of the Aircraft Ground Operation for the AMT Program and was evaluated in terms of Aircraft Simulator, Aircraft Run-up and Taxiing, Aircraft Fueling and refueling, Aircraft Marshalling, Aircraft Servicing, Facilities and Equipment, Aircraft Inspection and Safety Awareness. In the findings, all participants are males who belong to age ranging from 20-25 years old. Most of the participants are BSAMT/AMT graduates. The overall perception of the participant's AMT personnel and students on the effectiveness of aircraft ground operation has yielded a result that is verbally interpreted as ?effective?. This was further inferred and validated using Mann Whitney which resulted in the findings that there is no statistically significant difference in the responses of AMT personnel and the students. This meant that there was no significant difference in the perception of the group of participants on the effectiveness of the aircraft ground operation course in enriching the aircraft maintenance program.},
      month = {August},
  }