Home / Current Issue / Paper 1705059
Resilient Analysis on the Military Stakeholders' Approaches to Leadership
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Leadership Styles
Abstract
Conjoint analysis gives a potential method for figuring out the preferred styles of leadership across military stakeholders. It is a reliable measure of preferences. Conjoint analysis is used in this research along with both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The qualitative findings from the data indicate that honest, servant, transformational, and transactional leadership is the optimal military leadership style for stakeholders in Baguio City and Benguet. The research's conclusions prompted the creation of a data-collection tool for the quantitative technique to ascertain the average utility weight that the stakeholders give to their preferences for military leadership and the trade-offs that they made when deciding what those preferences should be. Quantitative findings show that, in decreasing order of significance, military stakeholders place a higher value on military officers who demonstrate transformational, transactional, servant, and authentic leadership. Within the four distinct leadership categories, the respondents properly traded off leadership philosophies.
Keywords
Authentic Leadership, Conjoint Analysis, Military Leadership, Stakeholder Theory, Transactional Leadership
References
[1] Baker, J. B., Keenan, S., Duquette-Frame, T. A., Kotwal, R., Harvey, A. S., Cap, A. P., ... & Gurney, J. M. (2023). Analysis of the US military trauma system in accordance with doctrinal levels of warfare. Military medicine, usad053.
[2] Brown, C., Douthwaite, A., Costas Batlle, I., & Savvides, N. (2022). A multi-stakeholder analysis of the risks to early school leaving: Comparing young peoples’ and educators’ perspectives on five categories of risk. Journal of Youth Studies, 1-25.
[3] Chapman, M. T., Temby, P., Melberzs, L., Crane, M., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2022). Resilience enhanced aFteR ACTiOn ReviewS (REFRACTORS) for teams: A pilot, nonrandomized investigation of feasibility within military settings. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 11(4), 567.
[4] Dimitrov, K. (2021). Important shades in the meaning of military culture–an etymological study. Научни трудове на УНСС, (1), 127-164.
[5] Freeman Jr, S., Commodore, F., Gasman, M., & Carter, C. (2016). Leaders wanted! The skills expected and needed for a successful 21st century historically Black college and university presidency. Journal of Black Studies, 47(6), 570-591.
[6] Galvin, T. P., & Allen, C. D. (2019). Leading change in military organizations: Primer for senior leaders. Department of Command, Leadership, and Management, School of Strategic Landpower, US Army War College.
[7] Goode, C. (2019). Best practice principles for professional military education: A literature review. Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM), 10(2), 5-20.
[8] Main, J. B., Camacho, M. M., Mobley, C., Brawner, C. E., Lord, S. M., & Kesim, H. (2019). Technically and tactically proficient: How military leadership training and experiences are enacted in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2), 446- 457.
[9] McCormick, W. H., Currier, J. M., Isaak, S. L., Sims, B. M., Slagel, B. A., Carroll, T. D., ... & Albright, D. L. (2019). Military culture and post- military transitioning among veterans: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Veterans Studies, 4(2), 287-298
[10] Moreno, A. R., Bravo, M. I. R., García-Guiu, C., Lozano, L. M., Pacheco, N. E., Navarro-Carrillo, G., & Valor-Segura, I. (2021). Effects of emerging leadership styles on engagement–a mediation analysis in a military context. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(5), 665-689.
[11] Prem, B. (2021). The regulation of private military and security companies: Analyzing power in multi-stakeholder initiatives. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(3), 345-370..
[12] Salam, M. A., & Khan, S. A. (2020). Lessons from the humanitarian disaster logistics management: A case study of the earthquake in Haiti. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(4), 1455-1473.
[13] Trachik, B., Moscardini, E. H., Ganulin, M. L., McDonald, J. L., McKeon, A. B., Dretsch, M. N., ... & Sowden, W. J. (2022). Perceptions of purpose, cohesion, and military leadership: A path analysis of potential primary prevention targets to mitigate suicidal ideation. Military psychology, 34(3), 366-375.
[14] Zainullin, S., & Zainullina, O. (2020). The Corporate Culture of the Enterprises of the Military-Industrial Complex. In Corporate Social Responsibility. IntechOpen..
How to cite this paper
@article{1705059,
author = {Easter B. Belandres },
title = {Resilient Analysis on the Military Stakeholders' Approaches to Leadership},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2023},
volume = {7},
number = {3},
pages = {293-298},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1705059.pdf},
abstract = {Conjoint analysis gives a potential method for figuring out the preferred styles of leadership across military stakeholders. It is a reliable measure of preferences. Conjoint analysis is used in this research along with both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The qualitative findings from the data indicate that honest, servant, transformational, and transactional leadership is the optimal military leadership style for stakeholders in Baguio City and Benguet. The research's conclusions prompted the creation of a data-collection tool for the quantitative technique to ascertain the average utility weight that the stakeholders give to their preferences for military leadership and the trade-offs that they made when deciding what those preferences should be. Quantitative findings show that, in decreasing order of significance, military stakeholders place a higher value on military officers who demonstrate transformational, transactional, servant, and authentic leadership. Within the four distinct leadership categories, the respondents properly traded off leadership philosophies.},
keywords = {Authentic Leadership, Conjoint Analysis, Military Leadership, Stakeholder Theory, Transactional Leadership},
month = {September},
}