International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1705091

1705091 Vol 7 · Issue 4 Download Paper

Determination of Key Principles of Sustainability Integration to Building Projects Development in Enugu State, Nigeria

Anthony N. Ezemerihe Kevin C. Okolie Shedrack A. Ume

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Civil Engineering

Abstract

The study determined the key principles of sustainability factor variables to be integrated to building projects for sustainable building projects delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria. In order to carry out the study, nine local government areas (three each from the three senatorial zones of the state) were sampled based on urbanization and population of inhabitants in the area. A total of four hundred (400) questionnaires were distributed to stakeholders in the built environment while three hundred and forty four (344) representing 86.0% of the respondents were returned and used for the analysis. The data was analyzed using common size percentage analysis, mean score using five point likert rating scale, severity index/ranking, regression and correlation analysis. The results show key principles of sustainability consists of environmental, economic and social factors. It ranked first with mean score of 4.40 and severity index of 88.1% while the social sustainability factors ranked second with mean score of 4.10 and severity index of 81.9%. the least in the ranking was environmental factors with mean score of 4.00 and severity index of 80.0. The work concluded that key sustainability principles integrated to building projects are design, construction with whole life operation and maintenance would enhance the economic welfare, environmental health and social wellbeing of communities in Enugu State. The study recommends that the integration of key principles of sustainability to building projects would require Government and community participation, in terms of finance, education, training and awareness creation through public private partnership to achieve sustainable building projects delivery and facilitate urban renewal programme in the state.

Keywords

Sustainability, Sustainable Buildings, Sustainable Integration, Economic Sustainability, Environmental Sustainability, Social Sustainability.

References

[1] Akadiri, P. O., Chinyio, E. A. and Olomolaiye, P. O. (2012). Design of A Sustainable Building: A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Sustainability in the Building Sector. Buildings 2012, 2, 126-152; doi:10.3390/buildings2020126

[2] Aluko, O. (2011). Functionality of the town planning authorities in effecting urban and regional planning laws and control in Nigeria: the case of Lagos state. African Research Review.An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, 5(6): 156 – 177.

[3] Ametepy S. O., Ansah, S. and Gyadu-Asiedu W. (2020). Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research. Vol. 8 No.3 Sept. 2020.

[4] Broman, G. I. and Robert K. H. (2017). A Framework for strategic sustainable development.Journal of cleaner production, vol 140, part 1 (17-310 January.

[5] CIDB (Construction Industry Development Board), (2003). IBS Roadmap 2003-2010, CIDB, Malaysia.

[6] Fodor, E. (1999). “Better not Bigger”. How to take Control of Urban Growth and Improve Your Community Toronto, Canada.

[7] GSB (2009). Gren Building Index for Non-Residential New Construction (NRNC) Malaysia, Green-Building Index Greenbuilding index sdn bhd, Malaysia.

[8] Hornby, A.S., GatenBy, E.V. and Wakefield, H. (2000) Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English, Oxford University Press.

[9] Kibert, C.J. and Grosskopf, K. (2005). Radical Sustainable Construction: Envisioning Next-Generation Green Buildings, White Paper, Next-Generation Green Buildings: The Rethinking Sustainable Construction 2006 (RSC06), Sarasota, Florida, USA, 19-22.

[10] Labuschagne, C. and Brent, A.C. and Classen, S. J. (2005). Environmental and Social Impact Considerations for Sustainable Project life cycle management in the Process Industry, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12:38 – 54.

[11] Mansur, S.A., Che Wan Putra, C.W.F. and Mohammed, A.H. (2003) Productivity Assessment and Schedule Compression Index (PASCI) for Project Planning.5th Asia Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ASPEC, 2003) Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

[12] Mugeda, O.M. and Mugeda, A.G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Narobi, Kenya: ACTS.

[13] Muldavin, S.R. (2010). Value beyond cost savings, how to underwrite sustainable properties,

[14] National Bureau of Statistics (2019). Enugu State of Nigeria.Retrieved from https://city population.de/Php/Nigeria-admin.

[15] Omolabi, A. (2008). Integrated urban Planning Framework for Enhancing Sustainable Spatial Development.Journal of Building and Construction Management, 1(1):

[16] Omolabi, A.O. (2003) “The need for a New Approach to an Effective Urban Environmental Planning and Management in Ethiopia. National Urban Planning Institute, Ethiopia.

[17] Onibokun, A. (1989) “Sustainable City and the Health City Concepts. New Dimensions in Pragmatic Urban Management. University of Ibadan Press.

[18] Reid, N.J. (2000) Community Planning Participation USDA Rural Development Office.

[19] Rowe, D. (2009). Heritage Buildings and Sustainability, Retrieved http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/data/assets/pdffile/003/44859/sustainabilityheritagetech-leaflet.pdf

[20] Sayce, S., Walker, A. and Mclntosh, A. (2004). Building Sustainability in the Balance: Promoting Stakeholder Dialogue. London: Estate Gazette.

[21] Sustainable Development Research Network (2002). A New Agenda for Sustainable Development Research, Policy Studies Institute, London.

[22] Udegbunam, D. O., Agbazue, V. E. and Ngang, B.U. (2017). Environment Impact Assessment: A Veritable Tool for sustainable Development in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-YAC) e-ISSN2278-5736 10(9) Ver. III September .38.43

[23] Un-Habitat and UNEP (2008). United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-HABITAT) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Sustainable cities Nigeria programme 1994 – 2006: Building platforms for environmentally sustainable urbanization, volume, 7.

[24] Wates, N. (2003) The Community Planning Handbook, London, UK.

How to cite this paper

Anthony N. Ezemerihe, Kevin C. Okolie, Shedrack A. Ume "Determination of Key Principles of Sustainability Integration to Building Projects Development in Enugu State, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 7 Issue 4 2023 Page 490-503
Anthony N. Ezemerihe, Kevin C. Okolie, Shedrack A. Ume "Determination of Key Principles of Sustainability Integration to Building Projects Development in Enugu State, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 7, no. 4, Oct. 2023
Anthony N. Ezemerihe, Kevin C. Okolie, Shedrack A. Ume (2023). Determination of Key Principles of Sustainability Integration to Building Projects Development in Enugu State, Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 7(4).
Anthony N. Ezemerihe, Kevin C. Okolie, Shedrack A. Ume "Determination of Key Principles of Sustainability Integration to Building Projects Development in Enugu State, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 7, no. 4, Oct. 2023.
@article{1705091,
      author = {Anthony N. Ezemerihe, Kevin C. Okolie, Shedrack A. Ume},
      title = {Determination of Key Principles of Sustainability Integration to Building Projects Development in Enugu State, Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {7},
      number = {4},
      pages = {490-503},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/17050912.pdf},
      abstract = {The study determined the key principles of sustainability factor variables to be integrated to building projects for sustainable building projects delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria. In order to carry out the study, nine local government areas (three each from the three senatorial zones of the state) were sampled based on urbanization and population of inhabitants in the area. A total of four hundred (400) questionnaires were distributed to stakeholders in the built environment while three hundred and forty four (344) representing 86.0% of the respondents were returned and used for the analysis. The data was analyzed using common size percentage analysis, mean score using five point likert rating scale, severity index/ranking, regression and correlation analysis. The results show key principles of sustainability consists of environmental, economic and social factors. It ranked first with mean score of 4.40 and severity index of 88.1% while the social sustainability factors ranked second with mean score of 4.10 and severity index of 81.9%. the least in the ranking was environmental factors with mean score of 4.00 and severity index of 80.0. The work concluded that key sustainability principles integrated to building projects are design, construction with whole life operation and maintenance would enhance the economic welfare, environmental health and social wellbeing of communities in Enugu State. The study recommends that the integration of key principles of sustainability to building projects would require Government and community participation, in terms of finance, education, training and awareness creation through public private partnership to achieve sustainable building projects delivery and facilitate urban renewal programme in the state.},
      keywords = {Sustainability, Sustainable Buildings, Sustainable Integration, Economic Sustainability, Environmental Sustainability, Social Sustainability.},
      month = {October},
  }