The Critical Success Factors and Development of Framework for Sustainable Building Projects Delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria

References

[1] APM (2012). APM body of knowledge: Sixth edn. Buckinghamshire: Association for project Management.

[2] BCA (2007). Sustainable construction materials for buildings. Retrieved 14th October, 2010 from http://www.bca.gov.sa/sustainable construction/others.se materials book.pdf.

[3] Broman, G. I. and Robert K. H. (2017). A Framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of cleaner production, vol 140, part 1 (17-310 January.

[4] CIDB (Construction Industry Development Board), (2003). IBS Roadmap 2003-2010, CIDB, Malaysia.

[5] CIOB (The Chartered Institute of Building), (2010). Code of Practice for Project Management for Construction and Development, Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom.

[6] Hayles, C. S. (2004). The Role of Value Management in the Construction of Sustainable Communities. The Value Manager, 10(1).

[7] IPCC, (2014). Climate Change: Synthesis Report.

[8] Labuschagne, C. and Brent, A.C. and Classen, S. J. (2005). Environmental and Social Impact Considerations for Sustainable Project life cycle management in the Process Industry, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12:38 – 54.

[9] Mansur, S.A., Che Wan Putra, C.W.F. and Mohammed, A.H. (2003) Productivity Assessment and Schedule Compression Index (PASCI) for Project Planning. 5th Asia Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ASPEC, 2003) Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

[10] Morris, P.W.F. (2011). Managing the Front End: Back to the Beginning. Project Perspectives, 33, 4-8.

[11] Mugeda, O.M. and Mugeda, A.G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Narobi, Kenya: ACTS.

[12] Muldavin, S.R. (2010). Value beyond cost savings, how to underwrite sustainable properties,

[13] Myers, D. (2005). A Review of construction companies' attitude to sustainability. Construction Management and Economics, 23: 781-785.

[14] National Bureau of Statistics (2023). Enugu State of Nigeria. Retrieved from https://city population.de/Php/Nigeria-admin.

[15] National Population Commission (2006). Federal Republic of Nigeria. Official Gazette, 96(2): 923. Abuja Federal Government Printer.

[16] Organization for Economic Co-orperation and Development (OECD) (2006) draft Standard on Development Evaluation. Development Assistance Committee.

[17] Rohracher, H. (2001). Managing the Technological Transition to Sustainable Construction of Buildings: A Socio-Technical perspective. Technology Analysis and strategic Management, 13(1): 137-150.

[18] Samset, K. (2010). Early Project Approval: Making the initial choices. Palgave Macmillian, Hampsher.

[19] Udegbunam, D. O., Agbazue, V. E. and Ngang, B.U. (2017). Environment Impact Assessment: A Veritable Tool for sustainable Development in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-YAC) e-ISSN2278-5736 10(9) Ver. III September .38.43

[20] Ugwu, O.O., and Haupt, T.C. (2007)."Key Performance Indicators and Assessment Methods for Infrastructure Sustainability A South African Construction Industry Perspective". Building and Environment, 42: 665-680.

[21] Un-Habitat and UNEP (2008). United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-HABITAT) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Sustainable cities Nigeria programme 1994 – 2006: Building platforms for environmentally sustainable urbanization, volume, 7.

@article{1705180,
      author = {Anthony N. Ezemerihe, Kevin C. Okolie, Shedrack A. Ume},
      title = {The Critical Success Factors and Development of Framework for Sustainable Building Projects Delivery in Enugu State, Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {7},
      number = {5},
      pages = {248-258},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/17051803.pdf},
      abstract = {The study established the critical success factors of sustainable building projects delivery in Enugu State and developed a framework for successful sustainable building projects delivery in the state. A study of nine selected local government areas (three each from the three senatorial zones of the state) was sampled based on urbanization and population of inhabitants in the area. A total of four hundred (400) questionnaires were distributed to stakeholders in the built environment while three hundred and forty four (344) representing 86.0% of the respondents were returned and used for the analysis. The data was analyzed using common size percentage analysis, mean score using five point likert rating scale, severity index/ranking, regression and correlation analysis. The result shows that meeting project goal and objective ranked first with mean score of 4.36 and severity index of 87.3%. This was followed by Health and Safety of occupants with mean score of 4.35 and severity index of 86.9%. The least in the ranking was efficiency of project execution and termination with mean score of 3.45 and severity index of 69.1%. The work concluded that the established critical success factors are necessary for development of framework for sustainable building projects development and delivery. The sustainable concepts applied to design, construction, operation and maintenance with whole life assessment of buildings would enhance the economic welfare, environmental health and social well-being of communities in the state. The study recommends that developing a template for sustainable building projects with database; engage in capacity building through education, training, skill acquisition and communities participation to close the knowledge gap; promote product innovation towards sustainable materials for affordability of occupants; encourage public, private partnership for urban renewal programme and enact legislation to back up all recommended proposals for proper enforcement.},
      keywords = {Sustainable buildings, Sustainable concepts, Sustainable framework, Critical success factors},
      month = {November},
  }