International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1705737

1705737 Vol 7 · Issue 10 Download Paper

Theoretical and Exploratory Analysis of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches in Selected African Societies

Emeka Camillus Nwadike

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Peace and Conflict

Abstract

The need for a hybrid justice system that incorporates the modern and indigenous justice systems to enhance cost-effective and efficient adjudication processes underscores the need to explore the theoretical and exploratory analysis of indigenous conflict resolution approaches in selected African societies. In lieu, the study relied on the desk review method to infer indigenous conflict resolution approaches vis-?-vis modern jurisprudence to find that despite the growing backlash of the traditional justice system in contemporary times, the potency of the traditional justice system engrossed in the norms and traditions is never in doubt. Indigenous conflict resolution approaches are reconciliatory and non-punitive, unlike the zero-sum game Western litigation system. It is cost effective and time efficient with merry-making in the adjudication processes to restore broken relationships. Despite these advantages, there are drawbacks of gross human rights violations and the violation of the principle of double jeopardy within the traditional justice system. On this premise, the study relied on the framework of conflict transformation advanced by Lederach that stressed the need for conflict resolution by addressing the underlying issues from different perspectives to recommend synergy between the modern and indigenous conflict resolution systems as evident in the Gacaca Court and Abunzi framework in Rwanda that enhanced peace in the post-Rwanda genocide of 1994.

Keywords

African Societies, Conflict Transformation Theory, Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches, Peacebuilding

References

[1] Albert, I.O. (2001). Introduction to Third-Party Intervention in Community Conflict: John Archers Publishers Ltd, Ibadan

[2] Ani, J., Innocent, O. and Oji, R. O. (2021). The Relevant of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanism in Farmers-Herders Conflicts in Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative and Political Studies. Volume 9 (1). ISSN: 2467-8503.

[3] Atakpa, O.E., Udoms, B. E. & Enang, P. U. (2021). The Ibibios’ View of Mbiam (Traditional Oat Taking) a Tool for Adjudication in Nigeria: A Policy Pathway. AKSU Journal of Administrative and Corporate Governance. Volume 1, No. 2.

[4] Ayuba, Y.L.S. (2016a). The Gbagyi/Gbari: Origin, Identity and Impact of Knunu (Traditional/Culture). International Journal of Current Advance Research. Volume 5 (3). ISSN: 2319-6475.

[5] Bamidele, O. (2014). African Indigenous System of Conflict Resolution: Reference to the Rwanda and Somalia. Peace Studies Journal. Volume 7(2). ISSN: 2151-0806. P 11-26.

[6] Blench, R., Lontau, S., Hassan, U. and Walsh, M. (2006). The Role of Traditional Rulers in Conflict Prevention and Mediation in Nigeria. Department for International Development (United Kingdom).

[7] Boutros-Boutros-Ghali. (1992). An Agenda for9 Peace, preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. Report of the Secretary General pursuant to the statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992, A/47/277 - S/24111, New York, UN.

[8] Brahimi, L. (2000). Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations, A/55/305, S/2000/809, New York, UN. Call, C.T., Cook, S.E., (2003). “On Democratization and Peacebuilding”, Global Governance, vol.9, pp.233-246.

[9] Burton, J. (1990). Conflict Resolution and Prevention. London: Macmillian.

[10] Coser, P. (2010). Conflict: social aspect (3rd). New York: Macmillan co (3). 83 -90.

[11] Debra, E. Owusu-Mensah, I. & Gyampo, R. (2014). Mediating the Dagbon Chieftaincy Conflict: The Eminent Chief Approach. Peace Studies Journal. Volume 7 (2).

[12] Dereje, S. (2010). The Role of Local Governments in Conflict Management: The case of Mieso Woreda. In Institute for Peace and Security Studies (IPSS), Addis Ababa University and Fredrich Ebert Stiftung (FES), An anthology of peace and security (pp. 71–119). Institute for Peace and Security Studies (IPSS), Addis Ababa University and Fredrich Ebert Stiftung (FES).

[13] Galtung, J. (1975). “Three Approaches to Peace: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking and Peacebuilding”, in Galtung, J., (ed.), Peace, War and Defense –Essays in Peace Research, vol.2, pp.282-304

[14] Issifu, K. A. & Asante Jr. J. (2016). Efficacy of the Indigenous Approach to Peace Building in Africa. Peace Studies Journal. Volume 9 (1).

[15] Jegede, O. P. (2019). Implications of Religious Conflicts on Peace, National Security and Development in Nigeria. Ilorin Journal of Religious Studies. Volume 9, No.1, pp.53-70.

[16] Kansiime, N. K. (2019). Promoting Traditional Ways of Handling Land Disputes in Western Uganda. American Research Journal and Social Sciences. Volume 2(8). Pp-17-25. E-ISSN: 2378-702X.

[17] Kariuki, F. (2018). African Traditional Justice Systems. Retrieved 22/05/2023. http://kmco.co.ke/wpcontent/uploads/2018/08/African-Traditional-Justice-Systems.pdf

[18] Lederach, J. P. & Maiese, M. (2009). Conflict Transformation: A Circular Journey with a Purpose. In: Lundqvist, K. ed. Conflict Transformation: Three Lenses in One Frame. Uppsala, Sweden: Life & Peace Institute, 7-10. Assessed 23/03/2023. http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/ConfictTransformation_NewRo utes2009.pdf

[19] Lot, E. A. (2022). The Effective of Mbiam (Traditional Concocted Oath) in Conflict Management in Ibibio Traditional Society. International Journal of Management, Social Sciences, Peace and conflict Studies. Volume 5, No. 2. ISSN: 2682-6135

[20] Momoh, H. B. (2021). The Role of Traditional Leaders in Peacemaking and Conflict Management among the Mende of Sierra Leone. International Journal of Science: Basic & Applied Research. Volume 55, No.2.

[21] Murithi, T. (2002). Rebuilding Social Trust in Northern Uganda. Peace Review, 14 (3): 291-295.

[22] Musingafi, M. C. C., Mafumbate, R. and Khumalo, T. (2019). Traditional Conflict Management Initiatives in Africa: Wellness Models for Southern Africa and the Zimbabwean Crisis. Journal of Culture, Society and Development. Volume 47. doi:107176/JCSD

[23] Nigatu, Y. B. & Jobir, B. D. (2022). Chalo –Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanism of Yem People and its Implication on Peace, Security, and Good Governance. Conflict Studies Quarterly. Issue 40. Doi.10.24193/csq.40.1.

[24] Quincy, W. (ed.) (1971). The Escalation of International Conflicts in Clajelt Smith Conflict Resolution: Contributions of Behavioural Science. London: Noitre Dame Press

[25] Sarki, A. P. & Jeremiah, M. (2021). ZhiBaje Ritual Festival and the Gbagyi Worldview. Igwebuike: An African Journal of Arts and Humanities. Volume 7, No.1.

How to cite this paper

Emeka Camillus Nwadike "Theoretical and Exploratory Analysis of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches in Selected African Societies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 7 Issue 10 2024 Page 327-338
Emeka Camillus Nwadike "Theoretical and Exploratory Analysis of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches in Selected African Societies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 7, no. 10, Apr. 2024
Emeka Camillus Nwadike (2024). Theoretical and Exploratory Analysis of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches in Selected African Societies. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 7(10).
Emeka Camillus Nwadike "Theoretical and Exploratory Analysis of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches in Selected African Societies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 7, no. 10, Apr. 2024.
@article{1705737,
      author = {Emeka Camillus Nwadike},
      title = {Theoretical and Exploratory Analysis of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches in Selected African Societies},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2024},
      volume = {7},
      number = {10},
      pages = {327-338},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1705737.pdf},
      abstract = {The need for a hybrid justice system that incorporates the modern and indigenous justice systems to enhance cost-effective and efficient adjudication processes underscores the need to explore the theoretical and exploratory analysis of indigenous conflict resolution approaches in selected African societies. In lieu, the study relied on the desk review method to infer indigenous conflict resolution approaches vis-?-vis modern jurisprudence to find that despite the growing backlash of the traditional justice system in contemporary times, the potency of the traditional justice system engrossed in the norms and traditions is never in doubt. Indigenous conflict resolution approaches are reconciliatory and non-punitive, unlike the zero-sum game Western litigation system. It is cost effective and time efficient with merry-making in the adjudication processes to restore broken relationships. Despite these advantages, there are drawbacks of gross human rights violations and the violation of the principle of double jeopardy within the traditional justice system. On this premise, the study relied on the framework of conflict transformation advanced by Lederach that stressed the need for conflict resolution by addressing the underlying issues from different perspectives to recommend synergy between the modern and indigenous conflict resolution systems as evident in the Gacaca Court and Abunzi framework in Rwanda that enhanced peace in the post-Rwanda genocide of 1994.},
      keywords = {African Societies, Conflict Transformation Theory, Indigenous Conflict Resolution Approaches, Peacebuilding},
      month = {April},
  }