International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1706158

1706158 Vol 8 · Issue 2 Download Paper

Strategies for Sustainable Development: The Role of Eco-Taxation and Renewable Energy Investment in the United States

Doreen Kitakufe Thomas Andrew Walugembe Shallon Asiimire Courage Obofoni Esechie Mark Sekinobe Oluwaseun Rafiu Adesanya

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Eco-Taxation

Abstract

Sustainable development, defined by the Brundtland Report as development meeting present needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their own, integrates environmental preservation, social justice, and economic progress. This approach is of vital importance against global ecological crises related to climate change, loss of biodiversity, and depletion of resources. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the United Nations, comprising 17 SDGs, set out a call for joint efforts of three major engines: governments, businesses, and civil society, toward the achievement of sustainable outcomes. One of the primary policy tools internalizing the external costs of environmental degradation, eco-taxation, or environmental taxation, provided incentives for business and people to opt for cleaner technologies. Carbon taxes are one of the frequently used tools of eco-taxation, and they have cut emissions while continuing to achieve economic growth. Renewable energy investment has accelerated in solar and wind due to technological improvement, backing by policy, and cost reduction. In this respect, the integration of eco-taxation and renewable energy investment works for sustainable development through a proper alignment of environmental, economic, and social objectives. This interaction can enable job creation, technological innovation, energy independence, and public health and social justice. Such strategic use of revenues from eco-taxes for funding projects in the area of renewable energies improves the policy coherence and stability required for long-term sustainability. Thereby, this combined approach can contribute towards the climate goals in mitigating resource dependency and encouraging comprehensive frameworks that give due consideration to environmental, economic, and social benefits of sustainable development.

Keywords

Renewable Energy, Sustainable Development, Eco-Taxation, Investment, U.S

References

[1] Andersen, M. S. (2019). Carbon taxation and fiscal consolidation: The potential of carbon pricingto reduce Europe's fiscal deficits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,94, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.01.002

[2] BloombergNEF. (2022). Corporate renewable energy procurement: Global trends and market insights. https://about.bnef.com/research/report/corporate-renewable-energyprocurement-2022/

[3] Brown, M. A., & Sovacool, B. K. (2021). Renewables and sustainable energy transitions: Promisesand challenges. Renewable Energy, 179, 1830-1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.091

[4] Dresner, S., Dunne, L., Clinch, P., & Beuermann, C. (2006). Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: An introduction to the special issue. Energy Policy, 34(8), 895-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.041

[5] Fullerton, D., Leicester, A., & Smith, S. (2017). Environmental taxes. In A. Auerbach, R. Chetty, M. Feldstein, & E. Saez (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 5, pp. 449-507). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00008-9

[6] Heeter, J., Keyser, D., & Tegen, S. (2019). Economic impacts of wind energy in rural America.Wind Energy, 22(8), 1032-1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2333

[7] Hepburn, C., O’Callaghan, B., Stern, N., Stiglitz, J., & Zenghelis, D. (2020). Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(S1), S359-S381. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa015

[8] Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O'Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244

[9] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCCSpecial Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels andrelated global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the globalresponse to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicatepoverty. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

[10] International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2019). Fiscal policies for Paris climate strategies—fromprinciple to practice. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy Papers/Issues/2019/05/01/Fiscal-Policies-for-Paris-Climate-Strategies-from-Principle-to Practice-46826

[11] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). World energy investment 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2021

[12] IRENA. (2022). Renewable power generation costs in 2021. https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Jun/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in2021

[13] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2020). Renewable energy and jobs – Annualreview 2020. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Sep/Renewable-Energy-and-JobsAnnual-Review-2020

[14] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2021). World energy transitions outlook:1.5°C pathway. https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/World-Energy-TransitionsOutlook

[15] Jakob, M., Edenhofer, O., & Hilaire, J. (2021). Taxing carbon: How to overcome distributional concerns. One Earth, 4(4), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.012

[16] Lazard. (2021). Lazard's levelized cost of energy analysis—Version 15.0. https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-2021/

[17] Metcalf, G. E. (2019). Carbon taxes in theory and practice. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093829

[18] Metcalf, G. E., & Stock, J. H. (2020). The macroeconomic impact of Europe’s carbon taxes.Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 14(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez013

[19] National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2021). Annual technology baseline 2021. https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/annual-technology-baseline.html

[20] Nemet, G. F., Zipperer, V., & Kraus, M. (2018). The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects. Energy Policy, 119, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.008

[21] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Taxing energy use2019: Using taxes for climate action. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/058ca239 en

[22] Pollin, R., Garrett-Peltier, H., Heintz, J., & Scharber, H. (2014). Green growth: A U.S. programfor controlling climate change and expanding job opportunities. Cambridge Journal ofRegions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp028

[23] Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., & Baker, L. (2019). The whole systems energy injustice of four European low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101965

[24] Sterner, T. (2012). Distributional effects of taxing transport fuel. Energy Policy, 41, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.013

[25] Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 20260-20264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108

[26] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

[27] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). The Paris Agreement.https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris agreement

[28] U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2021). U.S. energy and employment report (USEER) 2020. https://www.energy.gov/us-energy-employment-report-2020

[29] U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2021). U.S. energy and employment report 2021. https://www.energy.gov/us-energy-employment-report-2021

[30] U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2021). Electric power monthly with data for December 2020. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/

[31] Wei, M., Patadia, S., & Kammen, D. M. (2010). Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work:How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US? Energy Policy, 38(2),919-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.044

[32] World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future.Oxford University Press.

How to cite this paper

Doreen Kitakufe, Thomas Andrew Walugembe, Shallon Asiimire, Courage Obofoni Esechie, Mark Sekinobe; Oluwaseun Rafiu Adesanya "Strategies for Sustainable Development: The Role of Eco-Taxation and Renewable Energy Investment in the United States" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 8 Issue 2 2024 Page 360-371
Doreen Kitakufe, Thomas Andrew Walugembe, Shallon Asiimire, Courage Obofoni Esechie, Mark Sekinobe; Oluwaseun Rafiu Adesanya "Strategies for Sustainable Development: The Role of Eco-Taxation and Renewable Energy Investment in the United States" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 2, Aug. 2024
Doreen Kitakufe, Thomas Andrew Walugembe, Shallon Asiimire, Courage Obofoni Esechie, Mark Sekinobe; Oluwaseun Rafiu Adesanya (2024). Strategies for Sustainable Development: The Role of Eco-Taxation and Renewable Energy Investment in the United States. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 8(2).
Doreen Kitakufe, Thomas Andrew Walugembe, Shallon Asiimire, Courage Obofoni Esechie, Mark Sekinobe; Oluwaseun Rafiu Adesanya "Strategies for Sustainable Development: The Role of Eco-Taxation and Renewable Energy Investment in the United States" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 2, Aug. 2024.
@article{1706158,
      author = {Doreen Kitakufe, Thomas Andrew Walugembe, Shallon Asiimire, Courage Obofoni Esechie, Mark Sekinobe; Oluwaseun Rafiu Adesanya},
      title = {Strategies for Sustainable Development: The Role of Eco-Taxation and Renewable Energy Investment in the United States},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2024},
      volume = {8},
      number = {2},
      pages = {360-371},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1706158.pdf},
      abstract = {Sustainable development, defined by the Brundtland Report as development meeting present needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their own, integrates environmental preservation, social justice, and economic progress. This approach is of vital importance against global ecological crises related to climate change, loss of biodiversity, and depletion of resources. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the United Nations, comprising 17 SDGs, set out a call for joint efforts of three major engines: governments, businesses, and civil society, toward the achievement of sustainable outcomes. One of the primary policy tools internalizing the external costs of environmental degradation, eco-taxation, or environmental taxation, provided incentives for business and people to opt for cleaner technologies. Carbon taxes are one of the frequently used tools of eco-taxation, and they have cut emissions while continuing to achieve economic growth. Renewable energy investment has accelerated in solar and wind due to technological improvement, backing by policy, and cost reduction. In this respect, the integration of eco-taxation and renewable energy investment works for sustainable development through a proper alignment of environmental, economic, and social objectives. This interaction can enable job creation, technological innovation, energy independence, and public health and social justice. Such strategic use of revenues from eco-taxes for funding projects in the area of renewable energies improves the policy coherence and stability required for long-term sustainability. Thereby, this combined approach can contribute towards the climate goals in mitigating resource dependency and encouraging comprehensive frameworks that give due consideration to environmental, economic, and social benefits of sustainable development.},
      keywords = {Renewable Energy, Sustainable Development, Eco-Taxation, Investment, U.S},
      month = {August},
  }