Home / Current Issue / Paper 1706205
A Comparative Analysis of Government Expenditure on Analog versus Digital Curriculum Delivery in Kenyan Secondary Education
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Education
Abstract
This study conducts a comparative analysis of government expenditure on analog versus digital curriculum delivery methods in Kenyan secondary education from 2014 to 2023. The purpose is to examine the costs, reach, and effectiveness of both approaches to provide insights that can inform policy decisions and optimize resource allocation. The research employs a mixed-methods design, combining a quantitative longitudinal analysis of expenditure data with qualitative interviews of key stakeholders including education officials, school administrators, and teachers. The findings reveal a substantial shift towards digital curriculum delivery, with the percentage of expenditure increasing from 7.8% in 2014 to 47.7% in 2023. This transition accelerated from 2020 onwards, likely influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, significant regional disparities persist, with digital adoption rates of 62.3% in urban areas compared to 33.1% in rural areas as of 2023. Cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that while digital methods initially required higher investment, by 2023 they show improved outcomes in terms of lower cost per student (13,900 KES vs 15,300 KES), higher test score improvements (8.7% vs 5.2%) and completion rates (84.2% vs 78.5%) compared to analog methods. The study concludes that the transition to digital curriculum delivery in Kenya shows promising indications of cost-effectiveness and learning improvements. However, challenges remain in ensuring equitable access, particularly in rural areas. The findings provide an evidence base to guide policies and investments to optimize the benefits of digitalization while addressing potential disparities.
References
[1] Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Columbia University Press.
[2] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[3] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[4] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[5] Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation in data collection. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 527-544). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n34
[6] Government of Kenya. (2015). Kenya Vision 2030. http://vision2030.go.ke/
[7] Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). The economic impacts of learning losses. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 225. https://doi.org/10.1787/21908d74-en
[8] Kim, H., Cho, Y., & Byun, Y. (2019). The effects of smart education on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 903-928. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.35.4.903
[9] Kimenyi, E., Otieno, K., & Kaye, T. (2020). Building effective teacher capacity for ICT integration in schools in Kenya. EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3906043
[10] Kinyanjui, M., Akala, W. J., & Onderi, H. (2018). The role of digital literacy programme in enhancing content delivery in Kenyan primary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(14), 27-34. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/42468
[11] Levin, H. M., McEwan, P. J., Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., & Shand, R. (2017). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[12] Mbogo, R. W. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19 pandemic in Kenyan universities: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i4.3686
[13] Ministry of Education. (2020). Kenya Education Cloud. https://kec.ac.ke/
[14] Ministry of Education. (2021). Education sector report 2021. https://www.education.go.ke/index.php/downloads/file/662-education-sector-report-2021
[15] Musau, L. M., & Migosi, J. A. (2015). Teacher-related factors influencing the integration of information and communication technologies in teaching of English in public secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(10), 331-346. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2015/October-2015/28.pdf
[16] Mwaniki, P. W., Njihia, S. M., & Chege, F. N. (2018). The impact of Digital Literacy Programme on students' skills, knowledge and attitudes in Kenya. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7(1), 47-59.
[17] Mwangi, K. M., & McCormick, K. (2018). Implementing competency-based curriculum in Kenya: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 2(3), 24-39. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinforcitation.aspx?paperid=89305
[18] Ndege, K., Migosi, J., & Mziba, D. (2019). Enrolment patterns in secondary schools in Kenya. Journal of Popular Education in Africa, 3(7), 104-114. https://www.academia.edu/41175474/Enrolment_Patterns_in_Secondary_Schools_in_Kenya
[19] Ngware, M., Abuya, B., Admassu, K., Mutisya, M., & Musyoka, P. (2015). Quality and access to education in urban informal settlements in Kenya. Nairobi: African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC). https://aphrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ERP-III-Report_Final.pdf
[20] Nyagowa, H. O., Ocholla, D. N., & Mutula, S. M. (2017). The digital divide in Kenya: A case of university libraries in Kenya. Paper presented at IFLA WLIC 2017–Libraries. Solidarity. Society.–in Session 139–Africa. http://library.ifla.org/2492/
[21] Oduor, C. O., Getuno, N. A., & Ogutu, A. O. (2022). Challenges facing principals in implementing ICT integration in public secondary schools in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(6), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/13-6-08
[22] Republic of Kenya. (2021). The national treasury and planning: Budget statement for the fiscal year 2021/2022. https://www.treasury.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/FY-2021-22-Budget-Highlights_Final.pdf
[23] Rotich, D. C., & Saina, E. (2018). Textbook wastage in Kenyan secondary schools. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 4(4), 1-7. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/457-1541263350.pdf
[24] Sahni, S. D., Polanin, J. R., Zhang, Q., Michaelson, L. E., Caverly, S., Polese, M. L., & Yang, J. (2021). A What Works Clearinghouse rapid evidence review of distance learning programs. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/Distance_Learning_RER_508c.pdf
[25] Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
[26] Trucano, M. (2017). 20 innovative edtech projects from around the world. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/edutech/20-innovative-edtech-projects-around-world
[27] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[28] Wanzala, O. (2020, August 14). Inside Kenya's plan for digital literacy programme. Daily Nation. https://nation.africa/kenya/news/inside-kenya-s-plan-for-digital-literacy-programme-1925108
How to cite this paper
@article{1706205,
author = {Jayne Nasimiyu Wasike},
title = {A Comparative Analysis of Government Expenditure on Analog versus Digital Curriculum Delivery in Kenyan Secondary Education},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2024},
volume = {8},
number = {2},
pages = {698-705},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1706205.pdf},
abstract = {This study conducts a comparative analysis of government expenditure on analog versus digital curriculum delivery methods in Kenyan secondary education from 2014 to 2023. The purpose is to examine the costs, reach, and effectiveness of both approaches to provide insights that can inform policy decisions and optimize resource allocation. The research employs a mixed-methods design, combining a quantitative longitudinal analysis of expenditure data with qualitative interviews of key stakeholders including education officials, school administrators, and teachers. The findings reveal a substantial shift towards digital curriculum delivery, with the percentage of expenditure increasing from 7.8% in 2014 to 47.7% in 2023. This transition accelerated from 2020 onwards, likely influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, significant regional disparities persist, with digital adoption rates of 62.3% in urban areas compared to 33.1% in rural areas as of 2023. Cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that while digital methods initially required higher investment, by 2023 they show improved outcomes in terms of lower cost per student (13,900 KES vs 15,300 KES), higher test score improvements (8.7% vs 5.2%) and completion rates (84.2% vs 78.5%) compared to analog methods. The study concludes that the transition to digital curriculum delivery in Kenya shows promising indications of cost-effectiveness and learning improvements. However, challenges remain in ensuring equitable access, particularly in rural areas. The findings provide an evidence base to guide policies and investments to optimize the benefits of digitalization while addressing potential disparities.},
month = {August},
}