International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1706238

1706238 Vol 8 · Issue 3 Download Paper

AI Security in Social Engineering: Mitigating Risks of Data Harvesting and Targeted Manipulation

Oladoyin Akinsuli

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This paper critically reviews the importance of applying AI to boost security features on social media platforms to protect against unethical data collection and uses of psychological influence for political and business purposes. Most importantly, the abovementioned AI and machine learning experiences have become pervasive, revolutionizing the users? experiences and creating complicated means for developing malicious intents to track personal information and influence consumer experiences. Here, we also look into the existing artificial intelligence-based security systems like encryption, anomaly detection, and user authentication to understand their efficiency in protecting user data privacy. These worries will probably materialize in the following ways when artificial intelligence capabilities like facial recognition and natural language processing become more widely used. We discuss real-world examples to illustrate the repercussions of manipulating AI: the Cambridge Analytica case and Meta?s Ray-Ban augmented reality glasses. Thus, the paper explores the ethical challenge of AI misuse before outlining the importance of achieving the best mix of security benefits and concerns for users? freedom and privacy. Thus, we proposed a four-part solution aimed at some of those threats, which include increased data protection, ethical usage of the created AI framework, and general user education. Policymakers, social media companies, and designers of these A. Systems can benefit from our conclusions by making sure the latter protects users of such platforms from abuse.

Keywords

RPA Systems, Artificial intelligence, social networks, NLP, Facial Recognition

References

[1] Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465

[2] Birhane, A., & Cummins, F. (2019). Algorithmic injustices: Towards a relational ethics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07376. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.07376

[3] Bonneau, J., Herley, C., Van Oorschot, P. C., & Stajano, F. (2012). The quest to replace passwords: A framework for comparative evaluation of Web authentication schemes. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2012.44

[4] Brayne, S. (2017). Big data surveillance: The case of policing. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 977-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865

[5] Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016). A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(2), 1153–1176. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2494502

[6] Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1-15. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html

[7] Cadwalladr, C. (2018). The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/17/facebook-cambridge-analytica-kogan-data-algorithm

[8] Christl, W. (2017). Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life. Cracked Labs. https://crackedlabs.org/en/corporate-surveillance

[9] Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2016). Only humans need apply: Winners and losers in the age of smart machines. Harper Business.

[10] Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717

[11] Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d6

[12] Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Schafer, B. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

[13] Future of Life Institute. (2017). Asilomar AI Principles. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/

[14] Garvie, C. (2019). Garbage in, garbage out: Face recognition on flawed data. ACLU.

[15] Garvie, C., Bedoya, A. M., & Frankle, J. (2016). The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America. Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology. https://www.perpetuallineup.org/

[16] Gomez-Uribe, C. A., & Hunt, N. (2016). The Netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 6(4), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843948

[17] Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2672–2680. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2014/hash/5ca3e9b122f61f8f06494c97b1afccf3-Abstract.html

[18] Granville, K. (2018). Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: What you need to know as fallout widens. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/facebook-cambridge-analytica-explained.html

[19] Harwell, D. (2019). San Francisco bans use of facial recognition technology by police and city agencies. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/05/14/san-francisco-bans-use-facial-recognition-technology-by-police-city-agencies/

[20] Howard, P. N., & Kollanyi, B. (2016). Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational propaganda during the UK-EU referendum. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798311

[21] Howard, P. N., Woolley, S., & Calo, R. (2018). Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735

[22] IEEE. (2019). Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ec/autonomous-systems/

[23] Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. Computer, 51(8), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3191268

[24] Koetsier, J. (2021). Facebook launches Ray-Ban smart glasses. Forbes.

[25] Koetsier, J. (2024, October 3). Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses used to instantly dox strangers in public thanks to AI and facial recognition. Forbes.

[26] Kose, N., & Dugelay, J. L. (2018). Facial recognition in social media: Understanding privacy concerns. In Privacy and Security Issues in Social Networks (pp. 71-90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78849-4_4

[27] Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802-5805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110

[28] Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788-8790. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1320040111

[29] Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2016). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633-705.

[30] Kuo, L. (2018). Data firm says 'secret sauce' helped Trump; skeptics say it's 'bunk'. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/mar/30/cambridge-analytica-claims-big-data-trump-winning-election

[31] Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., ... & Schudson, M. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

[32] Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016

[33] Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861

[34] Monrose, F., & Rubin, A. D. (1999). Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication. Future Generation Computer Systems, 16(4), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(99)00059-X

[35] Mozur, P. (2018). Inside China’s dystopian dreams: A.I., shame and lots of cameras. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/business/china-surveillance-technology.html

[36] O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.

[37] Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.

[38] Singer, N., & Sang-Hun, C. (2018). Microsoft pressed on prison tech that can spot emotions. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/25/technology/microsoft-prison-emotion-recognition.html

[39] Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901

[40] Turow, J., Hennessy, M., & Draper, N. (2015). The tradeoff fallacy: How marketers are misrepresenting American consumers and opening them up to exploitation. Annenberg School for Communication. https://www.asc.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/TradeoffFallacy_1.pdf

[41] Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7

[42] Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs. https://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/titles/shoshana-zuboff/the-age-of-surveillance-capitalism/9781541758001

How to cite this paper

Oladoyin Akinsuli "AI Security in Social Engineering: Mitigating Risks of Data Harvesting and Targeted Manipulation" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 8 Issue 3 2024 Page 665-684
Oladoyin Akinsuli "AI Security in Social Engineering: Mitigating Risks of Data Harvesting and Targeted Manipulation" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 3, Sep. 2024
Oladoyin Akinsuli (2024). AI Security in Social Engineering: Mitigating Risks of Data Harvesting and Targeted Manipulation. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 8(3).
Oladoyin Akinsuli "AI Security in Social Engineering: Mitigating Risks of Data Harvesting and Targeted Manipulation" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 3, Sep. 2024.
@article{1706238,
      author = {Oladoyin Akinsuli},
      title = {AI Security in Social Engineering: Mitigating Risks of Data Harvesting and Targeted Manipulation},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2024},
      volume = {8},
      number = {3},
      pages = {665-684},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1706238.pdf},
      abstract = {This paper critically reviews the importance of applying AI to boost security features on social media platforms to protect against unethical data collection and uses of psychological influence for political and business purposes. Most importantly, the abovementioned AI and machine learning experiences have become pervasive, revolutionizing the users? experiences and creating complicated means for developing malicious intents to track personal information and influence consumer experiences. Here, we also look into the existing artificial intelligence-based security systems like encryption, anomaly detection, and user authentication to understand their efficiency in protecting user data privacy. These worries will probably materialize in the following ways when artificial intelligence capabilities like facial recognition and natural language processing become more widely used. We discuss real-world examples to illustrate the repercussions of manipulating AI:  the Cambridge Analytica case and Meta?s Ray-Ban augmented reality glasses. Thus, the paper explores the ethical challenge of AI misuse before outlining the importance of achieving the best mix of security benefits and concerns for users? freedom and privacy. Thus, we proposed a four-part solution aimed at some of those threats, which include increased data protection, ethical usage of the created AI framework, and general user education. Policymakers, social media companies, and designers of these A. Systems can benefit from our conclusions by making sure the latter protects users of such platforms from abuse.},
      keywords = {RPA Systems, Artificial intelligence, social networks, NLP, Facial Recognition},
      month = {September},
  }