Home / Current Issue / Paper 1706359
Analysis of Hate Rhetoric on Selected Social Media Platforms in Nigeria
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Pragmatics
Abstract
This paper is an analysis of social media hate utterances with a view to unearth how social media users persuade the audience on various sensitive societal issues. To achieve this, the study specifically analyses the rhetorical persuasive strategies employed in selected social media platforms in Nigeria. Sixty-three hate utterances/songs, drawn from six selected social media platforms (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, and online newspapers and magazines) in Nigeria were used as data for the investigation. The Aristotelian rhetoric theory of appeal was employed as the framework for this study. The study reveals that pathos rhetorical theory of appeal and Hyperbole rhetorical expression were used to injure and/or malign the target, more than other rhetorical appeals and figurative rhetorical expression. The study concludes that the high frequency of pathos rhetorical appeal and the high frequency of hyperbole hate figurative rhetorical expressions are deliberate just to inflict agonizing pain on the target. The study also concludes that the period in which data was collected may have accounted for this.
Keywords
Social Media, Rhetoric, Hate Speech, Hate Rhetoric, Hate Rhetorical Strategies.
References
[1] Aboh, C. S., Onuoha. V. N. & Kalu, N. O. (2020). Political discourse analysis of rhetoric in hate speeches in Nigeria. University of Nigeria Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 1 (2) 95-108.
[2] Agwuocha, U. A. (2020). COVID-19 induced hate speech and Austin’s speech act theory perspective: implications for peacebuilding. An African Journal of Arts and Humanities. 6 (5).2488-2710.
[3] Alo, M. A. (2012). A rhetorical analysis of selected political speeches of prominent African leaders. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences. 10 (1) 87-100
[4] Amedie, J. (2015). The impact of social media on society. (Unpublished Masters dissertation). University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
[5] Aristotle, (1926). The art of rhetoric. Heinemann.
[6] Arofah, K. (2018). Rhetorical analysis of hate speech: Case study of hate speech related to Ahok’s religion blasphemy Case. Mediator Jurnal Komunikasi. 11 (1) 91-105.
[7] Ayeni, A.C. (2018). Socio-pragmatic analysis of selected online hate speech in Nigeria. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Veritas University Abuja.
[8] Chinweuba, G. E & Ezeugwu, E. C. (2017). The ontological foundation of Igbo entrepreneurship: An analytical investigation. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion. 33, 17 – 24.
[9] Crystal, D. A. (2008). Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed). Blackwell Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-405-15296-9
[10] De Wet, J. C. (2010) The art of persuasive communication: A process. Juta and Company Ltd.
[11] Dhingraa, M. & Mudgal, R. K. (2019). Historical evolution of social media: An overview. http://ssrn.com/link/ICAESMT-2019.html=xyz
[12] Egbe, G.B. & Ekpe, S.I. (2009). War on words: Reporting conflict in Nigeria’s Niger-Delta region. Journal of Mass Media and Communication.2 (1) 121 – 134.
[13] Epstein, E. L. (1973). Linguistic styles. The Hague.
[14] Ernst, J., Schmitt J. B., Rieger, D., Beier, A. K., Vorderer, P., Bente, G. & Roth, H. (2017). Hate beneath the counter speeches? A qualitative content analysis of user comments on YouTube related to counter speeches videos. Journal of DE Radicalization. 21- 36.
[15] Ezeibe, C. (2015). Hate Speeches and Electoral Violence in Nigeria. (Unpublished manuscript). University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
[16] Fasakin, A., Oyero, O., Oyesome, O. & Okorie, N. (2017). Use of hate speeches in television political campaign proceedings from SOCIOINT 2017: The Fourth International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities. Dubai, UAE
[17] Freese, J. H. (1939). Aristotle: The art of rhetoric. Harvard University Press, London.
[18] Halliday M.A. (2013). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
[19] Hobbs, W., Lajevardi, N., Li, X. & Lucas, C. (2021). Group salience, inflammatory rhetoric and the persistence of hate against religious minorities. http://www.splcenter.org/news/2018/10/24/splc-announces-policy-recommendations-social-media-internet-companies-fight-hate-online
[20] Ibileye, G. (2018). Hate Speech: Minding your language in today’s Nigeria. The History, its emergence as a contested topical issue in Nigeria’s political discourse, and its probable linguistic and ideological typologies. National Roundtable on Hate Speech, Coal City University, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria.
[21] Koval, E., Sychev, A. & Zhadunova, N. (2019). Hate rhetoric Vs trust rhetoric in contemporary public discourse. SHS Web of Conferences 72, 03038 https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf /20197203038
[22] Makay, J. (1977). Speaking with an audience.: Harper and Row Publishers.
[23] Malmkjaer, K. (2002). “Functional Linguistics.” In K. Malmkjaer. (ed.) The Linguistic Encyclopedia. Routledge, pp. 167 – 170.
[24] Mauk, J. & Metz, J. (2016). Inventing arguments. (4th ed). Cengage Learning.
[25] Nations, D. (2021, May 30). What is social media: Explaining the big trend. Retrieved from https://www.lifewire.com/what-is-social-media-explaining-the-big-trend-3486616
[26] Nzeako, F. (Sept. 25, 2017). Hate speeches: Minding your language in today’s Nigeria https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/09/hate-speech-minding-language-todays-nigeria/
[27] Okafor, V. C. &Alabi, T. O. (2017). A speeches act analysis of hate speeches in the 2015 general election campaign in Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 5(6), 61-72.
[28] Ogugua, P. (2003), Septenary nature of Igbo cultural values: A hermeneutical approach. Double Pee Communications.
[29] Ottoh-Agede, B. S. (2022). Style and media rhetoric: Reporting terrorism in Nigeria. SEVHAGE Publishers
[30] Parajuli, A. P. (2021). Negative impact of social media. https://images.southmountaincc.edu/WebImages/cdn/hs/s-21/fin/Apsara-Pudasaini-Parajuli.pdf
[31] Shaw, L. (2012). Hate speeches in cyberspace: Bitterness without boundaries, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 25, 279 - 304.
[32] St. Clare, K. J. (2018). Linguistic disarmament: On how hate speeches functions, the way hate words can be reclaimed, and why we must pursue their reclamation. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations.17, 79–109.
[33] Toye, R. (2013). Rhetoric: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1706359,
author = {Biodun Ayeni, Gbenga Ibileye},
title = {Analysis of Hate Rhetoric on Selected Social Media Platforms in Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2024},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {712-723},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1706359.pdf},
abstract = {This paper is an analysis of social media hate utterances with a view to unearth how social media users persuade the audience on various sensitive societal issues. To achieve this, the study specifically analyses the rhetorical persuasive strategies employed in selected social media platforms in Nigeria. Sixty-three hate utterances/songs, drawn from six selected social media platforms (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, and online newspapers and magazines) in Nigeria were used as data for the investigation. The Aristotelian rhetoric theory of appeal was employed as the framework for this study. The study reveals that pathos rhetorical theory of appeal and Hyperbole rhetorical expression were used to injure and/or malign the target, more than other rhetorical appeals and figurative rhetorical expression. The study concludes that the high frequency of pathos rhetorical appeal and the high frequency of hyperbole hate figurative rhetorical expressions are deliberate just to inflict agonizing pain on the target. The study also concludes that the period in which data was collected may have accounted for this.},
keywords = {Social Media, Rhetoric, Hate Speech, Hate Rhetoric, Hate Rhetorical Strategies.},
month = {October},
}