Home / Current Issue / Paper 1706487
The Death of Whistleblowing Policies in Nigeria and How It Entrenches Corruption and Financial Misappropriation
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Economics
Abstract
This paper explores the decline of whistleblowing policies in Nigeria and their impact on the fight against corruption. Whistleblowing has been acknowledged worldwide as a fundamental tool for maintaining transparency and accountability in countries characterized by high levels of corruption (Transparency International, 2020). Although whistleblowing policies in Nigeria have managed to bring some positive results, they have begun to decline and, therefore, caused the growth of corruption and misappropriation (Adebayo, 2019). The research employed a comprehensive literature review methodology to gather data from a wide array of sources, including academic journals, government reports, and case studies (Smith, 2004; Jensen & Martin, 2018). This approach allowed for an in-depth examination of the historical development, current state, and challenges facing whistleblowing policies in Nigeria (Nwabuzor, 2019; Olawale, 2020). Theoretical frameworks such as Agency Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, Institutional Theory, and Resource Dependence Theory were utilized to analyze the data and provide a multifaceted understanding of the issues (Eisenhardt, 1989; Ajzen, 1991). The main observations are that the decrease in the effectiveness of whistleblowing results from less secure legal support for whistleblowers, a decreasing level of policy enforcement, and public and government trust in the mechanisms involved (Lewis, 2016; Duru, 2018). This results in both a drop in the number of reports actually submitted and a loss of public faith in these approaches as truly effective measures to stop corruption (Transparency International, 2019; Nwankwo, 2021). The implications of this study are significant for policymakers. They suggest that comprehensive reforms are needed to revitalize these policies (Umar et al., 2020). These include strengthening legal protections, establishing an independent whistleblowing body, enhancing public awareness, and ensuring rigorous monitoring and evaluation of policy outcomes (Harper, 2021; Mensah, 2019). This paper contributes to the broader discourse on governance and anti-corruption strategies, highlighting the critical need for robust whistleblowing mechanisms to combat corruption effectively in Nigeria (Okeke, 2019; Singh & Gupta, 2022).
References
[1] Adebayo, P. (2019). Enforcement inconsistencies and whistleblower risks: A Nigerian perspective. Journal of Public Policy and Administration.
[2] Adetunji, A. S., Afolayan, A., Olola, T., Fonkem, B., & Odunayo, R. (2023). An Examination Of The Effects Of Culturally Relevant Engineering Design On Students' Perception And Engagement In K-12 Stem Classrooms. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 7(5), 294–300. Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.14018572
[3] Adegoroye, A., & Olumide, F. (2021). Regional enforcement of whistleblowing policies and corruption control. Nigerian Journal of Governance and Development.
[4] Adetunji, A. S., Afolayan, A., Olola, T., Fonkem, B., & Odunayo, R. (2023). Enhancing Stem Education Through Culturally Relevant Engineering Design: A Mixed-Methods Approach To Improving Student Retention And Engagement. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 7(1), 618–627. Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.14018509
[5] Afolabi, A. (2019). Protection mechanisms for whistleblowers: A Nigerian case study. International Journal of Law and Governance.
[6] Akindele, S. T. (2016). The Nigerian Whistleblower Policy: An analysis. Journal of African Law.
[7] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
[8] Duru, U. (2018). Whistleblowing and anti-corruption strategies in Nigeria: A critical analysis. International Journal of Business and Management.
[9] Dworkin, T. M. (2007). SOX and whistleblowing. Michigan Law Review.
[10] Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
[11] Eme, O. I. (2021). Retaliation against whistleblowers: Cases from Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics.
[12] European Commission. (2019). EU Whistleblowing Directive.
[13] Federal Ministry of Finance. (2016). Whistleblower Policy.
[14] Harper, C. (2021). Independent whistleblowing agencies: Global best practices. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research.
[15] Jensen, M. C., & Martin, B. K. (2018). Whistleblowing and outcomes: Empirical analysis of whistleblower data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.
[16] Johnson, S., & Akinleye, D. (2016). Rewards for whistleblowing: Complications and implications. Journal of Financial Crime.
[17] Johnson, S. (2015). Legal protections for whistleblowers. Journal of Business Ethics.
[18] Lewis, D. (2016). The Public Interest Disclosure Act in the UK: An assessment. Industrial Law Journal, 45(2), 42-67.
[19] Mensah, S. (2019). Public awareness and whistleblowing: A study of perceptions and attitudes. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
[20] Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. Lexington Books.
[21] Nwabuzor, A. (2019). Whistleblowing policy implementation in developing countries: A comparative study. Public Administration and Development.
[22] Nwankwo, S. (2021). Policy decline and corruption increase: A Nigerian narrative. Journal of Public Affairs.
[23] Ogundiya, I. S. (2020). Legal enforcement and whistleblowing: A critique of the Nigerian judiciary. African Journal of Legal Studies.
[24] Okeke, M. I. (2019). The dark side of whistleblowing: Nigerian experiences. Journal of Business Ethics.
[25] Olawale, F. (2020). Whistleblowing effectiveness and public sector corruption. Government and Opposition.
[26] Olsen, P. (2014). The challenges of implementing whistleblower protections. Law and Society Review.
[27] Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
[28] Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications.
[29] Singh, S., & Gupta, P. (2022). Technological advancements in whistleblowing: Blockchain and anonymity. Journal of Information Technology and Public Policy.
[30] Smith, J. (2004). Early whistleblowing frameworks in Nigeria: An historical analysis. Journal of African Historical Review.
[31] Transparency International. (2019). Global Corruption Barometer. Transparency International.
[32] Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency International.
[33] Umar, H., et al. (2020). Legal protections for whistleblowers: A critical overview. Journal of International Law and International Relations.
[34] Vandekerckhove, W., & Phillips, A. (2020). The EU Whistleblowing Directive: Implementation challenges. Journal of European Public Policy.
[35] Williams, R. (2017). Public perceptions of whistleblowing in Nigeria. Journal of African Governance and Development.
How to cite this paper
@article{1706487,
author = {Iyanuoluwa Simon Bolarinwa, Toyosi Olola, Martins Awofadeju, Beryl Fonkem},
title = {The Death of Whistleblowing Policies in Nigeria and How It Entrenches Corruption and Financial Misappropriation},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2023},
volume = {7},
number = {6},
pages = {376-389},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1706487.pdf},
abstract = {This paper explores the decline of whistleblowing policies in Nigeria and their impact on the fight against corruption. Whistleblowing has been acknowledged worldwide as a fundamental tool for maintaining transparency and accountability in countries characterized by high levels of corruption (Transparency International, 2020). Although whistleblowing policies in Nigeria have managed to bring some positive results, they have begun to decline and, therefore, caused the growth of corruption and misappropriation (Adebayo, 2019). The research employed a comprehensive literature review methodology to gather data from a wide array of sources, including academic journals, government reports, and case studies (Smith, 2004; Jensen & Martin, 2018). This approach allowed for an in-depth examination of the historical development, current state, and challenges facing whistleblowing policies in Nigeria (Nwabuzor, 2019; Olawale, 2020). Theoretical frameworks such as Agency Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, Institutional Theory, and Resource Dependence Theory were utilized to analyze the data and provide a multifaceted understanding of the issues (Eisenhardt, 1989; Ajzen, 1991). The main observations are that the decrease in the effectiveness of whistleblowing results from less secure legal support for whistleblowers, a decreasing level of policy enforcement, and public and government trust in the mechanisms involved (Lewis, 2016; Duru, 2018). This results in both a drop in the number of reports actually submitted and a loss of public faith in these approaches as truly effective measures to stop corruption (Transparency International, 2019; Nwankwo, 2021). The implications of this study are significant for policymakers. They suggest that comprehensive reforms are needed to revitalize these policies (Umar et al., 2020). These include strengthening legal protections, establishing an independent whistleblowing body, enhancing public awareness, and ensuring rigorous monitoring and evaluation of policy outcomes (Harper, 2021; Mensah, 2019). This paper contributes to the broader discourse on governance and anti-corruption strategies, highlighting the critical need for robust whistleblowing mechanisms to combat corruption effectively in Nigeria (Okeke, 2019; Singh & Gupta, 2022).},
month = {December},
}