Home / Current Issue / Paper 1706910
A Comparative Analysis of Natural Gas and Hydrogen Pipeline Safety Standards: Lessons for the Transition to Clean Energy
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Renewable Technology
Abstract
The shift from natural gas to hydrogen pipelines represents an important component of the global transition to sustainable energy systems. This article investigates the readiness of existing pipeline infrastructure for hydrogen transportation by analyzing safety standards, materials, and emerging technologies. Through a comparative framework, we examine established natural gas regulations, such as those outlined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and the American Petroleum Institute (API), against evolving hydrogen-specific guidelines. Our findings highlight key challenges, including material embrittlement, higher diffusion rates, and insufficient monitoring technologies to address hydrogen?s unique properties. Proposed solutions include advanced material treatments, such as intelligent bi-directional induction techniques, and the integration of IoT-enabled safety systems for real-time leak detection. The study emphasizes the urgent need for policymakers, engineers, and industry stakeholders to collaborate in updating safety standards, investing in innovative technologies, and adopting a proactive approach to hydrogen infrastructure development. These steps are essential for ensuring hydrogen's safe and efficient transport and accelerating its role in achieving global climate targets.
Keywords
Hydrogen Pipelines, Natural Gas Standards, Hydrogen Embrittlement, Pipeline Safety, IoT Leak Detection, Sustainable Energy Transition, ASME, API, PHMSA.
References
[1] Aashna Raj, I.A. Sofia Larsson, Anna-Lena Ljung, Tobias Forslund, Robin Andersson, Joel Sundström, T.Staffan Lundström. (2024). Evaluating hydrogen gas transport in pipelines: Current state of numerical and experimental methodologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 67, ISSN 0360-3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.140.
[2] Abdulnaser M. Al-Sabaeei, Hitham Alhussian, Said Jadid Abdulkadir, Ajayshankar Jagadeesh. (2023). Prediction of oil and gas pipeline failures through machine learning approaches: A systematic review, Energy Reports, Volume 10, ISSN 2352-4847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.009.
[3] AFID (2024), Green hydrogen: A cross-industry dialogue for sustainability, Alliance for Industry Decarbonization, Abu Dhabi. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Alliance/Files/Publications/AFID_Green_hydrogen_dialogue_sustainability_2024.pdf
[4] Alejandra Hormaza Mejia, Jacob Brouwer, Michael Mac Kinnon, (2020). Hydrogen leaks at the same rate as natural gas in typical low-pressure gas infrastructure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 45, Issue 15, ISSN 0360-3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.159.
[5] Aminul Islam, Tahrim Alam, Nathan Sheibley, Kara Edmonson, David Burns, Manuel Hernandez, (2024). Hydrogen blending in natural gas pipelines: A comprehensive review of material compatibility and safety considerations. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 93, ISSN 0360-3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.384.
[6] Calabrese, M., Portarapillo, M., Di Nardo, A., Venezia, V., Turco, M., Luciani, G., & Di Benedetto, A. (2024). Hydrogen Safety Challenges: A Comprehensive Review on Production, Storage, Transport, Utilization, and CFD-Based Consequence and Risk Assessment. Energies, 17(6), 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17061350
[7] CEN-CENELEC. (2024). European standards adoption. Retrieved from https://www.cencenelec.eu/european-standardization/international-cooperation/european-standards-adoption/
[8] CSA Group. (2024). Assessment of natural gas pipeline materials for hydrogen service. Retrieved from https://www.csagroup.org/wp-content/uploads/CSA-Group-Research-Assessment-of-Natural-Gas-Pipeline-Materials-for-Hydrogen-Service.pdf
[9] Congressional Research Service. (2021). Pipeline Transportation of Hydrogen: Regulation, Research, and Policy (R46700). Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46700
[10] EIA (2024). Natural gas explained: Natural gas pipelines. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/natural-gas-pipelines.php
[11] DOE (2022). DOE Launches Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's $8 Billion Program for Clean Hydrogen Hubs Across the U.S. https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-launches-bipartisan-infrastructure-laws-8-billion-program-clean-hydrogen-hubs-across
[12] Dorota Brzezińska. (2021). Hydrogen dispersion phenomenon in nominally closed spaces. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 46, Issue 55, ISSN 0360-3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.061.
[13] Ferreira, Ines & Raghavan, Kumaresan & Ailyn, Diana. (2024). Technological Innovations: Advances in pipeline monitoring and leak detection technologies. https://www.fhs.com.au/fusion-melding-blog/the-advantages-of-polyethylene-pipes-in-modern-construction
[14] Ghadiani, H., Farhat, Z., Alam, T., & Islam, M. A. (2024). Assessing Hydrogen Embrittlement in Pipeline Steels for Natural Gas-Hydrogen Blends: Implications for Existing Infrastructure. Solids, 5(3), 375-393. https://doi.org/10.3390/solids5030025
[15] Hao Wang, Jay Shah, Said-El Hawwat, Qindan Huang, Alireza Khatami. (2024). A comprehensive review of polyethylene pipes: Failure mechanisms, performance models, inspection methods, and repair solutions. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, Volume 4, Issue 2, ISSN 2667-1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2024.100174.
[16] Hassan, B., Priya Sharma, Anya Ivanova (2023). Aging infrastructure: Challenges and risks associated with aging pipelines. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Baht-Hassan/publication/384326933_Aging_Infrastructure_Challenges_and_risks_associated_with_aging_pipelines/links/66f44b22f599e0392fa1b631/Aging-Infrastructure-Challenges-and-risks-associated-with-aging-pipelines.pdf
[17] Huang, X., Su, S., Xu, Z., Miao, Q., Li, W., & Wang, L. (2023). Advanced Composite Materials for Structure Strengthening and Resilience Improvement. Buildings, 13(10), 2406. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102406
[18] Hora, C., Dan, F. C., Secui, D. -C., & Hora, H. N. (2024). Systematic Literature Review on Pipeline Transport Losses of Hydrogen, Methane, and Their Mixture, Hythane. Energies, 17(18), 4709. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184709
[19] International Energy Forum. (2024). How previous energy transitions provide lessons for this one. Retrieved from https://www.ief.org/news/how-previous-energy-transitions-provide-lessons-for-this-one
[20] Joseph Nyangon, Ayesha Darekar (2024). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753124000262
[21] Li, Xiang & Shao, Puzhen & Wang, Jun & Huang, Liuyi & Dong, Zhi & Zhong, Fengping. (2024). Study on the permeability behavior of hydrogen-doped natural gas in polyethylene pipeline. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2713. 012001. 10.1088/1742-6596/2713/1/012001.
[22] Massimiliano Caporin, Fulvio Fontini, Roberto Panzica. (2023). The systemic risk of US oil and natural gas companies. Energy Economics, Volume 121, ISSN 0140-9883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106650.
[23] Matthew M. Ali 1 Julia C. Magee, Peter Y. Hsieh (2020). Corrosion protection of steel pipelines with metal-polymer composite barrier liners. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510020302614
[24] May, Z., Alam, M. K., & Nayan, N. A. (2022). Recent Advances in Nondestructive Method and Assessment of Corrosion Undercoating in Carbon–Steel Pipelines. Sensors, 22(17), 6654. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176654
[25] Muhammad Wasim, Tuan Duc Ngo. (2020). Failure analysis of structural steel subjected to long-term exposure of hydrogen. Engineering Failure Analysis, Volume 114, ISSN 1350-6307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104606.
[26] Muthmann, D. (2021). European Hydrogen Backbone - How a dedicated infrastructure can pave the way to large-scale competitive hydrogen for the European market. Retrieved from https://www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/06_EHB_presentation_Nordea.pdf
[27] Nachtane, M., Tarfaoui, M., Abichou, M. a., Vetcher, A., Rouway, M., Aâmir, A., Mouadili, H., Laaouidi, H., & Naanani, H. (2023). An Overview of the Recent Advances in Composite Materials and Artificial Intelligence for Hydrogen Storage Vessels Design. Journal of Composites Science, 7(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7030119
[28] Neil Gallon (2020). HYDROGEN PIPELINE DESIGN AND MATERIAL CHALLENGES AND MITIGATIONS. https://www.eprg.net/fileadmin/EPRG_Dokumente/FR-221_2020_Literature_study_hydrogen.pdf
[29] Nugraha, Febri. (2023). Materials Selection in Oil and Gas - An Overview. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17945.19046.
[30] Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. (2024). PHMSA enforcement. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved from https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulatory-compliance/phmsa-enforcement
[31] Pipeline Safety Trust. (2023). Hydrogen pipeline safety summary. Retrieved from https://pstrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/hydrogen_pipeline_safety_summary_1_18_23.pdf
[32] Qanbar, Mohammed & Hong, Zekai. (2024). A Review of Hydrogen Leak Detection Regulations and Technologies. Energies. 17. 4059. 10.3390/en17164059.
[33] Raghutla, Chandrashekar & Yeliyya, Kolati. (2023). Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of renewable energy: The role of political cooperation in China and India. Energy Reports. 10. 3092-3101. 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.139.
[34] Robert Hren, Annamaria Vujanović, Yee Van Fan, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Damjan Krajnc, Lidija Čuček. (2023). Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 173, ISSN 1364-0321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113113.
[35] Satu Lipiäinen, Kalle Lipiäinen, Antti Ahola, Esa Vakkilainen. (2023). Use of existing gas infrastructure in the European hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 48, Issue 80, ISSN 0360-3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.283.
[36] Seydibeyoğlu, M. Ö., Dogru, A., Wang, J., Rencheck, M., Han, Y., Wang, L., Seydibeyoğlu, E. A., Zhao, X., Ong, K., Shatkin, J. A., Shams Es-haghi, S., Bhandari, S., Ozcan, S., & Gardner, D. J. (2023). Review on Hybrid Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites with Nanocellulose, Nanomaterials, and Other Fibers. Polymers, 15(4), 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040984
[37] Sharma, Priya & Ivanova, Anya & Hassan, Baht. (2024). Aging Infrastructure: Challenges and risks associated with aging pipelines.
[38] Shree Om Bade, Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo. (2024). A review of governance strategies, policy measures, and regulatory framework for hydrogen energy in the United States. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. Volume 78. ISSN 0360-3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.338.
[39] U.S. Department of Energy. (2023). Clean hydrogen production tax credit. Retrieved from https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/laws/HY?state=US
[40] U.S. Department of Energy. (2024). Hydrogen pipelines. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-pipelines
[41] World Economic Forum 2022. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/05/action-clean-hydrogen-net-zero-2050/#:~:text=The%20International%20Renewable%20Energy%20Agency's,blue%20hydrogen%20(made%20from%20fossil
[42] Yanfei Wang, Jinna Han, Yuhang Zhao, Honglin Xie, Xinfeng Li, Dongyang Dou, Qili Wang, (2024). Grain refinement's effect on hydrogen embrittlement of 304 austenitic stainless steel: A comparative investigation of hydrogen in-situ charging vs. pre-charging. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 78, ISSN 0360-3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.224.
How to cite this paper
@article{1706910,
author = {Ayodele Owate},
title = {A Comparative Analysis of Natural Gas and Hydrogen Pipeline Safety Standards: Lessons for the Transition to Clean Energy},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {7},
pages = {224-234},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1706910.pdf},
abstract = {The shift from natural gas to hydrogen pipelines represents an important component of the global transition to sustainable energy systems. This article investigates the readiness of existing pipeline infrastructure for hydrogen transportation by analyzing safety standards, materials, and emerging technologies. Through a comparative framework, we examine established natural gas regulations, such as those outlined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and the American Petroleum Institute (API), against evolving hydrogen-specific guidelines. Our findings highlight key challenges, including material embrittlement, higher diffusion rates, and insufficient monitoring technologies to address hydrogen?s unique properties. Proposed solutions include advanced material treatments, such as intelligent bi-directional induction techniques, and the integration of IoT-enabled safety systems for real-time leak detection. The study emphasizes the urgent need for policymakers, engineers, and industry stakeholders to collaborate in updating safety standards, investing in innovative technologies, and adopting a proactive approach to hydrogen infrastructure development. These steps are essential for ensuring hydrogen's safe and efficient transport and accelerating its role in achieving global climate targets.},
keywords = {Hydrogen Pipelines, Natural Gas Standards, Hydrogen Embrittlement, Pipeline Safety, IoT Leak Detection, Sustainable Energy Transition, ASME, API, PHMSA.},
month = {January},
}