International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1707003

1707003 Vol 6 · Issue 6 Download Paper

Explainable Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making: Bridging Transparency and Performance

Martin Lious

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Machine Learning

Abstract

Nowadays, machine learning (ML) has shown significant success in making high-tensile decisions for health care, economic, legal, and public safety domains. These domains require not only accurate prediction models but also understandable predictions because these models should be transparent, non-discriminatory, and auditable. However, a significant challenge arises from the trade-off between model complexity and interpretability: They have found that highly accurate methods, including deep neural networks, may not be interpretable, but weakly interpretable models are less precise, for instance, performing worse than deep neural networks. The current article discusses principles and methodologies used in XML and the approaches appropriate for using these models in critical decision-making contexts. It discusses methods of model interpretation of intrinsic and post-hoc types, particular types of interpretable models, and specific explanation methods like SHAP and LIME. The discussion above reveals some pertinent problems, including using accurate general models, incorporating bias-free and fair models, and integrating the algorithms in real-time business decisions. This paper also discusses the ethics of XML, societal concerns relating to the use of XML and calls for trust and accountability as well as compliance with the set regulations. As summarised, the paper discusses the further prospects for research in the subject area, with causal explainability, the use of interactive tools, and the creation of appropriate ethical standards for using explainable AI systems. By creating the bridge between transparency and performance, XML points to approaches to develop trustful, fair, and efficient ML solutions for critical applications.

Keywords

Explainable Machine Learning, High-Stakes Decision-Making, Transparency in AI, Interpretable Models, AI Explainability, Model Transparency, Ethical AI, Trustworthy AI Systems, Performance in Machine Learning, Responsible AI Deployment, Decision-Making Systems, AI in Critical Domains, Machine Learning Accountability, AI Fairness and Ethics, Interpretability vs. Performance.

References

[1] Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160.

[2] Felzmann, H., Villaronga, E. F., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2019). Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 2053951719860542.

[3] Samek, W. (2017). Explainable artificial intelligence: Understanding, visualizing, and interpreting deep learning models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.08296.

[4] Khedkar, S., Subramanian, V., Shinde, G., & Gandhi, P. (2019). Explainable AI in healthcare. In 2nd International Conference on Advances in Science & Technology (ICAST), April 8, 2019.

[5] Hagras, H. (2018). Toward human-understandable, explainable AI. Computer, 51(9), 28–36.

[6] Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019, May). Designing theory-driven user-centric explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15).

[7] Fox, M., Long, D., & Magazzeni, D. (2017). Explainable planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10256.

[8] Arnold, M., Bellamy, R. K., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., ... & Varshney, K. R. (2019). FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier's declarations of conformity. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 63(4/5), 6-1.

[9] Anjomshoae, S., Najjar, A., Calvaresi, D., & Främling, K. (2019). Explainable agents and robots: Results from a systematic literature review. In 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2019), Montreal, Canada, May 13–17, 2019 (pp. 1078–1088). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

[10] Hoffman, R. R., Mueller, S. T., Klein, G., & Litman, J. (2018). Metrics for explainable AI: Challenges and prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04608.

[11] Fellous, J. M., Sapiro, G., Rossi, A., Mayberg, H., & Ferrante, M. (2019). Explainable artificial intelligence for neuroscience: Behavioral neurostimulation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1346. Preece, A. (2018). Asking ‘Why’ in AI: Explainability of intelligent systems–Perspectives and challenges. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 25(2), 63–72.

[12] Papenmeier, A., Englebienne, G., & Seifert, C. (2019). How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trust. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12652.

[13] Ahmad, M. A., Eckert, C., & Teredesai, A. (2019). The challenge of imputation in explainable artificial intelligence models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12669.

[14] Mueller, S. T., Hoffman, R. R., Clancey, W., Emrey, A., & Klein, G. (2019). Explanation in human-AI systems: A literature meta-review, synopsis of key ideas and publications, and bibliography for explainable AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01876.

[15] Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL vs. ELT: Comparative analysis and best practices. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).

[16] Gade, K. R. (2019). Data migration strategies for large-scale projects in the cloud for fintech. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).

[17] Dazeley, R., Vamplew, P., Foale, C., Young, C., Aryal, S., & Cruz, F. (2021). Levels of explainable artificial intelligence for human-aligned conversational explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03178.

[18] Hussain, F., Hussain, R., & Hossain, E. (2021). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): An engineering perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03613.

[19] Islam, S. R., Eberle, W., Ghafoor, S. K., & Ahmed, M. (2021). Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approaches: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.09429.

[20] Dazeley, R., Vamplew, P., Foale, C., Young, C., Aryal, S., & Cruz, F. (2021). Levels of explainable artificial intelligence for human-aligned conversational explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03178

[21] Ahmadi, N. S. (2019). Container security in the cloud: Hardening orchestration platforms against emerging threats. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 4(1), 064–074. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2019.4.1.0077

[22] Ahmadi, S. (2023). Next Generation AI-Based Firewalls: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 49(1), 245-262.

[23] Ahmadi, S. (2023). Cloud Security Metrics and Measurement. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online), 2(1), 93-107.

[24] Ahmadi, S. (2023). Open AI and its Impact on Fraud Detection in Financial Industry. Sina, A.(2023). Open AI and its Impact on Fraud Detection in Financial Industry. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN, 2959-6386.

[25] Ahmadi, S. (2023). Optimizing Data Warehousing Performance through Machine Learning Algorithms in the Cloud. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 12(12), 1859-1867.

[26] Ahmadi, S., & Wan, C. (2020). Resilient IoT ecosystems through predictive maintenance and AI security layers. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 8(6)

[27] Sina Ahmadi. (2021). Elastic Routing Frameworks: A Novel Approach to Dynamic Path Optimization in Distributed Networks. Well Testing Journal, 30(1), 45–70. Retrieved from https://welltestingjournal.com/index.php/WT/article/view/45-70

[28] Ahmadi, S. (2022). Advancing fraud detection in banking: Real-time applications of explainable AI (XAI). Journal of Electrical Systems, 18(4), 141–150. Retrieved from https://journal.esrgroups.org/jes/article/view/7821/5351

[29] Ahmadi, S. (2022). Advancing fraud detection in banking: Real-time applications of explainable AI (XAI). Journal of Electrical Systems, 18(4), 141–150. Retrieved from https://journal.esrgroups.org/jes/article/view/7821/5351

How to cite this paper

Martin Lious "Explainable Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making: Bridging Transparency and Performance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 6 Issue 6 2022 Page 357-373
Martin Lious "Explainable Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making: Bridging Transparency and Performance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 6, no. 6, Dec. 2022
Martin Lious (2022). Explainable Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making: Bridging Transparency and Performance. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 6(6).
Martin Lious "Explainable Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making: Bridging Transparency and Performance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 6, no. 6, Dec. 2022.
@article{1707003,
      author = {Martin Lious},
      title = {Explainable Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision-Making: Bridging Transparency and Performance},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2022},
      volume = {6},
      number = {6},
      pages = {357-373},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1707003.pdf},
      abstract = {Nowadays, machine learning (ML) has shown significant success in making high-tensile decisions for health care, economic, legal, and public safety domains. These domains require not only accurate prediction models but also understandable predictions because these models should be transparent, non-discriminatory, and auditable. However, a significant challenge arises from the trade-off between model complexity and interpretability: They have found that highly accurate methods, including deep neural networks, may not be interpretable, but weakly interpretable models are less precise, for instance, performing worse than deep neural networks. The current article discusses principles and methodologies used in XML and the approaches appropriate for using these models in critical decision-making contexts. It discusses methods of model interpretation of intrinsic and post-hoc types, particular types of interpretable models, and specific explanation methods like SHAP and LIME. The discussion above reveals some pertinent problems, including using accurate general models, incorporating bias-free and fair models, and integrating the algorithms in real-time business decisions. This paper also discusses the ethics of XML, societal concerns relating to the use of XML and calls for trust and accountability as well as compliance with the set regulations. As summarised, the paper discusses the further prospects for research in the subject area, with causal explainability, the use of interactive tools, and the creation of appropriate ethical standards for using explainable AI systems. By creating the bridge between transparency and performance, XML points to approaches to develop trustful, fair, and efficient ML solutions for critical applications.},
      keywords = {Explainable Machine Learning, High-Stakes Decision-Making, Transparency in AI, Interpretable Models, AI Explainability, Model Transparency, Ethical AI, Trustworthy AI Systems, Performance in Machine Learning, Responsible AI Deployment, Decision-Making Systems, AI in Critical Domains, Machine Learning Accountability, AI Fairness and Ethics, Interpretability vs. Performance.},
      month = {December},
  }