Home / Current Issue / Paper 1707167
Indigenous Language Preservation in the Digital Age: The Role of Technology in Promoting Linguistic Diversity
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Indigenous Language
Abstract
The preservation of indigenous languages has become a pressing concern in the digital age, as globalization and technological advancements continue to threaten linguistic diversity. This study explores the role of digital tools in promoting the sustainability of indigenous languages among undergraduate students in the Department of Mass Communication at Taraba State University, Jalingo, Nigeria. Utilizing a sample of 300 students, the study examines their awareness, usage, and institutional support for digital tools designed for indigenous language preservation. The research employs a quantitative approach, collecting and analyzing data through descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including chi-square and Spearman?s correlation tests. Findings reveal that while students have little awareness of the available digital tools for indigenous language preservation, their actual engagement and usage remain significantly low. The chi-square test indicates no statistically significant relationship between awareness and usage (p=0.617p = 0.617p=0.617), suggesting that knowledge alone does not translate into active participation. Similarly, the Spearman correlation between institutional support and usage is weak (?=0.052,p=0.368\rho = 0.052, p = 0.368?=0.052,p=0.368), implying that institutional backing has limited influence on student engagement. These results highlight the need for a more strategic approach to integrating digital tools into educational curricula, alongside targeted awareness campaigns and improved accessibility. The study concludes that for digital technology to effectively contribute to indigenous language preservation, stakeholders must address infrastructural barriers, enhance digital literacy, and create incentives for active participation. The paper recommends collaborative efforts between academia, policymakers, and tech developers to bridge the gap between awareness and usage, ensuring the sustainability of indigenous languages in the digital era.
Keywords
Indigenous Language Preservation, Digital Tools, Linguistic Diversity, Technological Integration, Student Engagement
References
[1] Bamgbose, A. (2019). Language and the nation: The language question in sub-Saharan Africa. Edinburgh University Press.
[2] Banda, F. (2019). African languages and the digital era: Challenges and prospects. Routledge.
[3] Bird, S. (2022). Computational tools for endangered language revitalization: Lessons from thefield. Language Documentation & Conservation, 16(1), 45-67.
[4] Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
[5] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
[6] Eisenlohr, P. (2018). Digital media and language shift: The semiotics of connectivity in Mauritius. Language & Communication, 62, 1-11.
[7] Ethnologue. (2021). How many languages are endangered? Retrieved from www.ethnologue.com
[8] Fishman, J. A. (2001). Can threatened languages be saved? Reversing language shift, revisited: A 21st century perspective. Multilingual Matters.
[9] Hinton, L., Huss, L., & Roche, G. (2018). The Routledge handbook of language revitalization. Routledge.
[10] Kelly-Holmes, H., & Pietikäinen, S. (2022). Algorithmic injustice and linguistic diversity in digitalspaces. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(2), 234-250.
[11] Mager, M., Liu, Y., Adams, O., Ponti, E., & Ruder, S. (2021). Tackling low-resource languageswith multilingual pre-trained models. Transactions of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics, 9, 334-352.
[12] Morris, M. (2020). Digital storytelling and indigenous language reclamation: Lessons from community media. New Media & Society, 22(8), 1392-1410.
[13] O’Neil, C. (2020). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
[14] Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
[15] Pietikäinen, S. (2021). Linguistic diversity and digital inequalities: The role of digital platforms inindigenous language practices. Multilingua, 40(3), 367-390.
[16] Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
[17] UNESCO. (2019). Atlas of the world's languages in danger. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
[18] Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1707167,
author = {Chris JD Michael},
title = {Indigenous Language Preservation in the Digital Age: The Role of Technology in Promoting Linguistic Diversity},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {8},
pages = {464-474},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1707167.pdf},
abstract = {The preservation of indigenous languages has become a pressing concern in the digital age, as globalization and technological advancements continue to threaten linguistic diversity. This study explores the role of digital tools in promoting the sustainability of indigenous languages among undergraduate students in the Department of Mass Communication at Taraba State University, Jalingo, Nigeria. Utilizing a sample of 300 students, the study examines their awareness, usage, and institutional support for digital tools designed for indigenous language preservation. The research employs a quantitative approach, collecting and analyzing data through descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including chi-square and Spearman?s correlation tests. Findings reveal that while students have little awareness of the available digital tools for indigenous language preservation, their actual engagement and usage remain significantly low. The chi-square test indicates no statistically significant relationship between awareness and usage (p=0.617p = 0.617p=0.617), suggesting that knowledge alone does not translate into active participation. Similarly, the Spearman correlation between institutional support and usage is weak (?=0.052,p=0.368\rho = 0.052, p = 0.368?=0.052,p=0.368), implying that institutional backing has limited influence on student engagement. These results highlight the need for a more strategic approach to integrating digital tools into educational curricula, alongside targeted awareness campaigns and improved accessibility. The study concludes that for digital technology to effectively contribute to indigenous language preservation, stakeholders must address infrastructural barriers, enhance digital literacy, and create incentives for active participation. The paper recommends collaborative efforts between academia, policymakers, and tech developers to bridge the gap between awareness and usage, ensuring the sustainability of indigenous languages in the digital era.},
keywords = {Indigenous Language Preservation, Digital Tools, Linguistic Diversity, Technological Integration, Student Engagement},
month = {February},
}