Use of Remote Sensing (MODIS) Data and Rainfall to Estimate Forage Production in Arid Rangeland

References

[1] Asner, G. P., Elmore, A. J., Olander, L. P., Martin, R. E., & Harris, A. T. (2004). Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 29(1), 261-299.

[2] Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., Meikle, T. W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2005). The accuracy of ground-cover measurements. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 59(2), 179-188.

[3] Cowling, R. M., Esler, K. J., & Rundel, P. W. (1999). Namaqualand, South Africa–an overview of a unique winter-rainfall desert ecosystem. Plant Ecology, 142(1), 3-21.

[4] Desmet, P. G. (2007). Namaqualand—A brief overview of the physical and floristic environment. Journal of Arid Environments, 70(4), 570-587.

[5] ESRI. (2021). ArcGIS Pro. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

[6] Fensholt, R., Sandholt, I., & Rasmussen, M. S. (2004). Evaluation of MODIS LAI, fAPAR and the relation between fAPAR and NDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91(3-4), 490-507.

[7] Herrmann, S. M., Anyamba, A., & Tucker, C. J. (2005). Recent trends in vegetation dynamics in the African Sahel and their relationship to climate. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 394-404.

[8] Hijmans, R. J. (2021). raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.4-13.

[9] Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1-2), 195-213.

[10] Hunt, E. R., Everitt, J. H., Ritchie, J. C., Moran, M. S., Booth, D. T., Anderson, G. L., ... & Seyfried, M. S. (2003). Applications and research using remote sensing for rangeland management. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(6), 675-693.

[11] Huxman, T. E., Smith, M. D., Fay, P. A., Knapp, A. K., Shaw, M. R., Loik, M. E., ... & Williams, D. G. (2004). Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature, 429(6992), 651-654.

[12] Kerr, J. T., & Ostrovsky, M. (2003). From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(6), 299-305.

[13] Konje M., Muoria P., & Wabuyele E. (2021). Spatial-temporal variation of biomass production by shrubs in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, Vol.18,(4), 82-92

[14] Konje M., Muoria P, Wabuyele E, Griffin N, & Vetter S. (2021). Rainfall and Soils, Not Grazing Intensity, Determine the Composition and Productivity of Annual Plants in a Bio-diverse Arid Winter Rainfall Region. Journal of Natural Sciences Research www.iiste.org, Vol.12, (10), 35-48

[15] Konje M., Muoria P., Wabuyele E. and Vetter S. (2021). Spatio-Temporal Variation in Forage Production in a Key Resource Area in the Succulent Karoo Rangeland, South Africa. Researchjournali’s Journal of Ecology, Vol. 8 (1), 1-21

[16] Mucina, L., & Rutherford, M. C. (2006). The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute.

[17] Myneni, R. B., Hoffman, S., Knyazikhin, Y., Privette, J. L., Glassy, J., Tian, Y., & Running, S. W. (2002). Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1-2), 214-231.

[18] Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J. M., Tucker, C. J., & Stenseth, N. C. (2005). Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), 503-510.

[19] R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

[20] Reynolds, J. F., Stafford Smith, D. M., Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Mortimore, M., Batterbury, S. P., ... & Walker, B. (2007). Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science, 316(5826), 847-851.

[21] Schino, G., Borfecchia, F., De Cecco, L., Dibari, C., Iannetta, M., Martini, S., & Pedrotti, F. (2003). Satellite estimate of grass biomass in a mountainous range in central Italy. Agroforestry Systems, 59(2), 157-162.

[22] Snyman, H. A. (1998). Dynamics and sustainable utilization of rangeland ecosystems in arid and semi-arid climates of southern Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 39(4), 645-666.

[23] Wessels, K. J., Prince, S. D., Malherbe, J., Small, J., Frost, P. E., & VanZyl, D. (2007). Can human-induced land degradation be distinguished from the effects of rainfall variability? A case study in South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 68(2), 271-297.

[24] Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.

[25] Yang, Y., Fang, J., Ma, W., Guo, D., & Mohammat, A. (2009). Large-scale pattern of biomass partitioning across China's grasslands. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(2), 268-277.

@article{1707413,
      author = {Martha Muthoni Konje},
      title = {Use of Remote Sensing (MODIS) Data and Rainfall to Estimate Forage Production in Arid Rangeland},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {8},
      number = {9},
      pages = {185-193},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1707413.pdf},
      abstract = {This study investigated the use of remote sensing data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and rainfall data to estimate forage production in the arid rangelands of the Richtersveld National Park, South Africa. The research aimed to assess the spatial and temporal variability in forage production across five vegetation types and three landscape units, and to examine the relationships between the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR), rainfall, and biomass production. Field measurements of above-ground biomass were collected during the peak growing season in 2007 and compared with corresponding MODIS fPAR data. The results revealed significant spatial heterogeneity in forage production, with higher biomass observed in the Central Richtersveld Mountain and Northern Richtersveld Scorpionstailveld vegetation types, and in the mountain landscape unit. Leaf and stem succulents contributed the most to the available forage, while grasses and forbs dominated in the desert vegetation types. A strong positive linear relationship was found between MODIS fPAR and field biomass measurements, indicating the potential of using remote sensing data as a reliable proxy for forage production. Rainfall emerged as a key driver of vegetation dynamics, with both fPAR and biomass showing strong positive correlations with precipitation. The study highlights the importance of understanding the spatial and temporal variability in forage resources for effective rangeland management and conservation planning in arid environments. The findings suggest that the integration of remote sensing data and rainfall records can provide valuable insights into the dynamics of arid rangelands and support the development of adaptive management strategies in the face of increasing climate variability and land use pressures.},
      keywords = {Arid rangelands, Forage production, MODIS fPAR, Rainfall, Richtersveld National Park},
      month = {March},
  }