Home / Current Issue / Paper 1707957
A Review of ?Blockchain- Based Farmer?s Fund Distribution System?
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Computer Engineering
Abstract
This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of the study by Raskar et al., which presents a blockchain-enabled platform for farmer-centric subsidy disbursement and fund tracking. We expand on the original work by detailing additional blockchain advancements?such as Layer 2 scaling solutions, zero-knowledge proofs for privacy, and decentralized identity frameworks?and critically assess system architecture, implementation on Angular instead of the originally proposed React JS, and testing rigor. While the original contributes a well-defined roadmap for mobile and web interfaces, our review identifies opportunities for performance benchmarking, governance models, and modular smart contract design to enable upgradability. We conclude by outlining research trajectories to strengthen scalability, enhance privacy, and align with regulatory requirements for agricultural finance.
Keywords
Farmers' fund distribution, Blockchain review, Fund distribution, Transparency, Accountability, System evaluation, Smart contracts, Layer 2 scaling, Decentralized, identity
References
[1] Raskar, S. M., Jadhav, A. M., Zagade, T. S., & Tarate, R. R. (2024). Blockchain-Based Farmer’s Fund Distribution System. International Journal of Emerging Technology.
[2] Katore, A., & Choubey, S. (2021). Government Scheme and Funds Tracker using Blockchain. IJERT, 10(5).
[3] Jambhulkar, S. S., & Ratnaparkhi, V. P. (2020). Government Fund Distribution and Tracking System Using Blockchain Technology. JETIR, 7(9).
[4] Xiong, H., Dalhaus, T., Wang, P., & Huang, J. (2020). Blockchain Technology for Agriculture: Applications and Rationale. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3.
[5] Zheng, Z., et al. (2023). Scalability and Privacy in Blockchain Systems: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
[6] Hardjono, T., & Smith, N. (2022). Decentralized Identity Guide – W3C. https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
[7] Buterin, V. (2021). An EIP on Proxy Upgrade Patterns. Ethereum Improvement Proposals.
[8] Boneh, D., & Ben-Sasson, E. (2020). ZK-SNARKs: The Essentials. Journal of Cryptographic Research.
How to cite this paper
@article{1707957,
author = {Shruti Mahendra Raskar, Anushka Mohan Jadhav, Tanuja Sanjay Zagade, Rutuja Rajendra Tarate, Prof.Tushar D. Kolhe},
title = {A Review of ?Blockchain- Based Farmer?s Fund Distribution System?},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {10},
pages = {686-691},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1707957.pdf},
abstract = {This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of the study by Raskar et al., which presents a blockchain-enabled platform for farmer-centric subsidy disbursement and fund tracking. We expand on the original work by detailing additional blockchain advancements?such as Layer 2 scaling solutions, zero-knowledge proofs for privacy, and decentralized identity frameworks?and critically assess system architecture, implementation on Angular instead of the originally proposed React JS, and testing rigor. While the original contributes a well-defined roadmap for mobile and web interfaces, our review identifies opportunities for performance benchmarking, governance models, and modular smart contract design to enable upgradability. We conclude by outlining research trajectories to strengthen scalability, enhance privacy, and align with regulatory requirements for agricultural finance.},
keywords = {Farmers' fund distribution, Blockchain review, Fund distribution, Transparency, Accountability, System evaluation, Smart contracts, Layer 2 scaling, Decentralized, identity},
month = {April},
}