Home / Current Issue / Paper 1707973
Evidence-Based Approaches to Anger Management in Contemporary Psychological Practice
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Psychology
Abstract
This paper examines contemporary evidence-based approaches to anger management within psychological practice, synthesizing current research and clinical applications. The investigation explores the theoretical foundations of anger as an emotional and behavioral phenomenon, reviewing cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, and neurobiological perspectives that inform modern treatment protocols. Through analysis of peer-reviewed literature and clinical case studies, this paper identifies effective assessment methodologies and intervention strategies that demonstrate empirical support across diverse populations. Key findings indicate that multimodal approaches combining cognitive restructuring, emotional regulation techniques, and skills training yield optimal outcomes when tailored to individual client needs and cultural contexts. The paper further examines emerging technological interventions and highlights areas warranting additional research. Implications for psychological education and clinical practice suggest the importance of integrating these evidence-based approaches into university curricula and treatment planning to address the significant personal and societal impacts of maladaptive anger. This review contributes to the scholarly discourse by providing a comprehensive yet concise framework for understanding and addressing anger management from both theoretical and practical perspectives.
References
[1] Beck, A. T. (1999). Prisoners of hate: The cognitive basis of anger, hostility, and violence. HarperCollins.
[2] Beck, R., & Fernandez, E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of anger: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(1), 63-74.
[3] Benson, H. (1975). The relaxation response. Morrow.
[4] Blair, R. J. R. (2012). Considering anger from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(1), 65-74.
[5] Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
[6] Canli, T., & Lesch, K. P. (2007). Long story short: The serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition. Nature Neuroscience, 10(9), 1103-1109.
[7] Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindful emotion regulation: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 560-572.
[8] Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2009). The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: A meta-analytic review of prospective evidence. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(11), 936-946.
[9] Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59-70.
[10] Deffenbacher, J. L. (2011). Cognitive-behavioral conceptualization and treatment of anger. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 18(2), 212-221.
[11] Deffenbacher, J. L., & McKay, M. (2000). Overcoming situational and general anger: A protocol for the treatment of anger based on relaxation, cognitive restructuring, and coping skills training. New Harbinger Publications.
[12] DeWall, C. N., Finkel, E. J., & Denson, T. F. (2011). Self-control inhibits aggression. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(7), 458-472.
[13] DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2007). Understanding anger disorders. Oxford University Press.
[14] Eckhardt, C. I., Barbour, K. A., & Stuart, G. L. (2019). Anger and hostility in anger disorders. In M. J. Prinstein, E. A. Youngstrom, E. J. Mash, & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of disorders in childhood and adolescence (4th ed., pp. 129-156). Guilford Press.
[15] Fernandez, E., & Johnson, S. L. (2016). Anger in psychological disorders: Prevalence, presentation, etiology and prognostic implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 46, 124-135.
[16] Fernandez, E., Scott, S., & Horner, M. (2018). Development and testing of a screening tool for anger-related problems. Psychological Assessment, 30(11), 1464-1474.
[17] Fischer, A. H., Gillebaart, M., Rotteveel, M., Becker, D., & Vliek, M. (2012). Veiled emotions: The effect of covered faces on emotion perception and attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 266-273.
[18] Hofmann, S. G., Grossman, P., & Hinton, D. E. (2011). Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: Potential for psychological interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(7), 1126-1132.
[19] Lee, A. H., & DiGiuseppe, R. (2018). Anger and aggression treatments: A review of meta-analyses. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 65-74.
[20] Spielberger, C. D. (1999). State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
[21] Sukhodolsky, D. G., Kassinove, H., & Gorman, B. S. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(7), 659-680.
How to cite this paper
@article{1707973,
author = {Christine Julie Nabwire},
title = {Evidence-Based Approaches to Anger Management in Contemporary Psychological Practice},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {10},
pages = {745-757},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1707973.pdf},
abstract = {This paper examines contemporary evidence-based approaches to anger management within psychological practice, synthesizing current research and clinical applications. The investigation explores the theoretical foundations of anger as an emotional and behavioral phenomenon, reviewing cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, and neurobiological perspectives that inform modern treatment protocols. Through analysis of peer-reviewed literature and clinical case studies, this paper identifies effective assessment methodologies and intervention strategies that demonstrate empirical support across diverse populations. Key findings indicate that multimodal approaches combining cognitive restructuring, emotional regulation techniques, and skills training yield optimal outcomes when tailored to individual client needs and cultural contexts. The paper further examines emerging technological interventions and highlights areas warranting additional research. Implications for psychological education and clinical practice suggest the importance of integrating these evidence-based approaches into university curricula and treatment planning to address the significant personal and societal impacts of maladaptive anger. This review contributes to the scholarly discourse by providing a comprehensive yet concise framework for understanding and addressing anger management from both theoretical and practical perspectives.},
month = {April},
}