Assessing The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Against Cyber-Physical Attacks

References

[1] Arvin, M., Beiki, P., Hejazi, S. J., Sharifi, A., & Atashafrooz, N. (2023). Assessment of infrastructure resilience in multi-hazard regions: A case study of Khuzestan Province. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103601

[2] Alvarez, F., Arena, M., Auteri, D., Binaglia, M., Castoldi, A. F., Chiusolo, A., … Villamar-Bouza, L. (2023, October 1). Updated conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mecoprop-P. EFSA Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8344

[3] Adriaanse, P., Arce, A., Focks, A., Ingels, B., Jölli, D., Lambin, S., … Auteri, D. (2023). Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989

[4] Bellora-Bienengräber, L., Harten, C., & Meyer, M. (2023). The effectiveness of risk assessments in risk workshops: the role of calculative cultures. Journal of Risk Research, 26(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2022.2108120

[5] Barrère, M., Hankin, C., & O’Reilly, D. (2023). Cyber-physical attack graphs (CPAGs): Composable and scalable attack graphs for cyber-physical systems: Cyber-physical attack graphs (CPAGs). Computers and Security, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103348

[6] Bi, W., MacAskill, K., & Schooling, J. (2023). Old wine in new bottles? Understanding infrastructure resilience: Foundations, assessment, and limitations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103793

[7] Borths, C. J., Burr, T., Figuccia, A., Ford, J. G., Guan, B., Jones, M. T., … Wetter, C. (2023, October 20). Nitrosamine Risk Assessments in Oligonucleotides. Organic Process Research and Development. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00330

[8] Clay, J. (2023). Cybersecurity. In IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Body of Knowledge (TEMSBOK) (pp. 381–396). wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119987635.ch22

[9] Fernandez De Arroyabe, I., Arranz, C. F. A., Arroyabe, M. F., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2023). Cybersecurity capabilities and cyber-attacks as drivers of investment in cybersecurity systems: A UK survey for 2018 and 2019. Computers and Security, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102954

[10] Gerges, F., Assaad, R. H., Nassif, H., Bou-Zeid, E., & Boufadel, M. C. (2023). A perspective on quantifying resilience: Combining community and infrastructure capitals. Science of the Total Environment, 859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160187

[11] Huijts, N. M. A., Haans, A., Budimir, S., Fontaine, J. R. J., Loukas, G., Bezemskij, A., … Roesch, E. B. (2023). User experiences with simulated cyber-physical attacks on smart home IoT. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 27(6), 2243–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-023-01774-5

[12] Huang, X., Wen, Y., Zhang, F., Han, H., Huang, Y., & Sui, Z. (2023, July 1). A review on risk assessment methods for maritime transport. Ocean Engineering. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114577

[13] Kapucu, N., Hu, Q., Sadiq, A. A., & Hasan, S. (2023). Building urban infrastructure resilience through network governance. Urban Governance, 3(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.01.001

[14] Li, C., Sun, N., Lu, Y., Guo, B., Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Yao, Y. (2023, January 1). Review on Urban Flood Risk Assessment. Sustainability (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010765

[15] Machireddy, Jeshwanth,Automation in Healthcare Claims Processing: Enhancing Efficiency and Accuracy(April 16, 2023). International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2023, 09(01), 825-834, Available at  http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5159747

[16] Mukherjee, M., Abhinay, K., Rahman, M. M., Yangdhen, S., Sen, S., Adhikari, B. R., … Shaw, R. (2023). Extent and evaluation of critical infrastructure, resilience status, and its future dimensions in South Asia. Progress in Disaster Science, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100275

[17] Machireddy, Jeshwanth, Harnessing AI and Data Analytics for Smarter Healthcare Solutions (January 14, 2023). International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2023, 08(02), 785-798 , Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5159750

[18] Mouratidis, H., Islam, S., Santos-Olmo, A., Sanchez, L. E., & Ismail, U. M. (2023). Modelling language for cyber security incident handling for critical infrastructures. Computers and Security, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103139

[19] Ntafloukas, K., Pasquale, L., Martinez-Pastor, B., & McCrum, D. P. (2023). A Vulnerability Assessment Approach for Transportation Networks Subjected to Cyber-Physical Attacks. Future Internet, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15030100

[20] Pursiainen, C., & Kytömaa, E. (2023). What does it mean from European critical infrastructure protection to the resilience of European critical entities? Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 8(sup1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2022.2128562

[21] Peng, D. T., Dong, J., Yang, J., Li, T., & Peng, Q. (2023). Dense Overload Subgraph Induced by Cyber-Physical Attacks in Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 70(2), 611–615. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3177460

[22] Panyukov, D. I., Kozlovskii, V. N., Aidarov, D. V., & Shakurskii, M. V. (2023). Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Russian Engineering Research, 43(8), 1011–1013. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X23080208

[23] Pritika, Shanmugam, B., & Azam, S. (2023, February 1). Risk Assessment of Heterogeneous IoMT Devices: A Review. Technologies. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11010031

[24] Saeed, S., Altamimi, S. A., Alkayyal, N. A., Alshehri, E., & Alabbad, D. A. (2023, August 1). Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity Challenges for Businesses Resilience: Issues and Recommendations. Sensors. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156666

[25] Shaikh, F. A., & Siponen, M. (2023). Information security risk assessments following cybersecurity breaches: The mediating role of top management attention to cybersecurity. Computers and Security, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102974

[26] Sánchez-García, I. D., Mejía, J., & San Feliu Gilabert, T. (2023). Cybersecurity Risk Assessment: A Systematic Mapping Review, Proposal, and Validation. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010395

[27] Sharifisoraki, Z., Dey, A., Selzler, R., Amini, M., Green, J. R., Rajan, S., & Kwamena, F. A. (2023). Monitoring Critical Infrastructure Using 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. IEEE Access. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232338

[28] Yang, Z., Barroca, B., Weppe, A., Bony-Dandrieux, A., Laffréchine, K., Daclin, N., … Chapurlat, V. (2023, April 1). Indicator-based resilience assessment for critical infrastructures – A review. Safety Science. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106049

[29] Xu, W., Cong, J., & Proverbs, D. G. (2023). Evaluation of infrastructure resilience. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(2), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-09-2020-0075

[30] Ye, X., Du, J., Han, Y., Newman, G., Retchless, D., Zou, L., … Cai, Z. (2023). Developing Human-Centered Urban Digital Twins for Community Infrastructure Resilience: A Research Agenda. Journal of Planning Literature, 38(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221137861

[31] Zhang, S., Han, Y., Peng, J., Chen, Y., Zhan, L., & Li, J. (2023, January 1). Human health risk assessment for contaminated sites: A retrospective review. Environment International. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107700

[32] Zhou, M., Liu, C., Jahromi, A. A., Kundur, D., Wu, J., & Long, C. (2023). Revealing Vulnerability of N-1 Secure Power Systems to Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attacks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(2), 1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3169482

@article{1707996,
      author = {Nageshwar Masakapalli},
      title = {Assessing The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Against Cyber-Physical Attacks},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2024},
      volume = {7},
      number = {9},
      pages = {530-537},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1707996.pdf},
      abstract = {Modern societies experience increased cyber-physical attack threats because they created integrated systems which weakened their ability to protect national stability and economic well-being and public security foundations. The investigative process functions to examine cyber-physical attack resilience through the assessment of system exposure levels and protection systems and operational systems in various sectors. The analysis includes both qualitative research methods and quantitative indicators by using current risk management models and resilience assessment frameworks and cybersecurity principles. IoT and SCADA system deployments throughout the energy sector and transportation together with water supply systems have increased exposure as Zhou et al. (2023), Peng et al. (2023), and Clay (2023) establish. Performing risk assessments becomes challenging because risk measurement techniques fail to follow standardization and numerous regions lack proper incident response plans (Bellora-Bienengr?ber et al., 2023; Mouratidis et al., 2023). The synchronization of digital twins with network governance allows 3D LiDAR real-time monitoring of point clouds alongside digital twin models to produce extensive resilience solutions, according to Ye et al. (2023), Kapucu et al. (2023), Sharifisoraki et al. (2023). Different academic disciplines come together through this research to create a new framework while developing data-based approaches for reducing cyber-physical threats. Standard practices between industries should be converged alongside improved cyber hygiene measures that integrate community needs and infrastructure into modelling systems (Arvin et al., 2023; Gerges et al., 2023).},
      keywords = {Critical Infrastructure, Cyber-Physical Attacks, Infrastructure Resilience, Cybersecurity, Risk Assessment},
      month = {March},
  }