Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708274
Navigating The Complexities of AI-Generated Media: A Digital Forensic Perspective
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Cybersecurity
Abstract
The latest expansion of AI media provides an entirely new set of hurdles to digital forensic investigations. This paper will discuss the challenges of analyzing and verifying AI media from a digital forensic point of view. By discussing how different forms of AI techniques and tools are used to create media, this research examines the complexity of differentiating authentic from unauthentic content. Additionally, it discusses the implications of AI-generated media on the authenticity of digital evidence presented in court and what it means for the court process. Utilizing case studies and methods, this research also offers strategies and approaches to navigating the challenges of AI-generated media within the field of digital forensics. By understanding the challenges presented by AI-generated media, forensic users can improve their ability to detect and account for AI-generated content when determining reliability and authenticity when considering digital evidence in an AI-dominated world.
Keywords
AI-generated, investigation, Deepfake, artificial intelligence
References
[1] O. Emehin, O. Adeyeye, & I. Akanbi, (2024). Generative AI in Forensic Data Analysis: Opportunities and Ethical Implications for Cloud-Based Investigations. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. 6. 2941-2957. 10.55248/gengpi.5.1024.2904..
[2] N. Raghuwanshi (2020 February 19) Indian Politician Manoj Tiwari Used Deepfake To Reach More Voters. Fossbytes. Retrived from https://fossbytes.com/deepfake-used-by-indian-politician-reach-more-voters/.
[3] M. A. Ghamdi (2024). Deepfake forensics: a survey of digital forensic methods for multimodal deepfake identification on social media. PeerJ Computer Scince. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2037
[4] B. Bokolo & Q. Liu (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Social Media Forensics: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis. Electronics. 13. 1671. 10.3390/electronics13091671.
[5] Bendiab, G., Haiouni, H., Moulas, I., & Shiaeles, S. (2025). Deepfakes in digital media forensics: Generation, AI-based detection and challenges. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 88, 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103935
[6] S. Sachdeva, B. Raina, & A. Sharma (2020). Analysis of Digital Forensic Tools. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 17. 2459-2467. 10.1166/jctn.2020.8916.
[7] S. H. Silva, M. Bethany, A. M. Votto, I. H. Scarff, N. Beebe, & P. Najafirad (2021). Deepfake forensics analysis: An explainable hierarchical ensemble of weakly supervised models. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 4, 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100217
[8] J. C. Neves, R. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, V. Lopes, H. Proença, & J. Fierrez (2022). GAN Fingerprints in Face Image Synthesis. In: Sencar, H.T., Verdoliva, L., Memon, N. (eds) Multimedia Forensics. Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7621-5_8
[9] Y. Sun., Y. Tang, & X. Chen (2022). A Neural Network-Based Partial Fingerprint Image Identification Method for Crime Scenes. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13021188
[10] H.P. Quang., & P. V. Kien (2025). Insight into how legal and ethical considerations of artificial intelligence enhance the effectiveness of cyber forensic accounting. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2025.2480972
[11] C. Kerdvibulvech (2024). Big data and AI-driven evidence analysis: A global perspective on citation trends, accessibility, and future research in legal applications. Journal of Big Data, 11(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-01046-w
[12] D. Mustafa, N. Kshetri, M. Insiew, & O. Alfandi (2024). Ethical Challenges and Solutions of Generative AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Informatics, 11(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030058
[13] M. Barash, D. McNevin, V. Fedorenko, & P. Giverts (2024). Machine learning applications in forensic DNA profiling: A critical review. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 69, 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102994
[14] A. R. Ikuesan, & H. S. Venter (2019). Digital behavioral-fingerprint for user attribution in digital forensics: Are we there yet? Digital Investigation, 30, 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.07.003
[15] R. Li., X. Zhang, Z. Xu, Y. Zhang, & J. Zhang (2024). Protect-Your-IP: Scalable Source-Tracing and Attribution against Personalized Generation. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16596
[16] N. Christopher (2020 February 18) the first use of deepfakes in indian election by bjp. Vice. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-first-use-of-deepfakes-in-indian-election-by-bjp/
[17] S. Catherine (2019 August 30) Fraudsters Used AI to Mimic CEO’s Voice in Unusual Cybercrime Case. Wall Street journal Pro. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/fraudsters-use-ai-to-mimic-ceos-voice-in-unusual-cybercrime-case-11567157402
[18] S. Stephanie (2024 August 10) Nonconsensual sexual images posted online made worse by deepfakes and AI technology. PBS News. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/nonconsensual-sexual-images-posted-online-made-worse-by-deepfakes-and-ai-technology
[19] S. Raphael (2020 July 15) Deepfake used to attack activist couple shows new disinformation frontier. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/deepfake-used-to-attack-activist-couple-shows-new-disinformation-frontier-idUSKCN24G15E/
[20] G. Joanna (2022 September 12) AI-generated art is booming - but who really owns it? World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/artificial-intelligence-ai-generated-art-ethics-copyright/
[21] [Some characters in this reference could not be displayed correctly — please refer to the published PDF for the full reference.]
[22] ôïåÜåÜåÜÔÈïÀµÀµ¯¦¦¦šŽ€€qqqš€bQ€ 5�6�CJOJPJQJ\�]�aJ5�6�CJOJQJ\�]�aJhÕ[95�6�CJOJQJaJ5�6�CJOJPJQJaJ5�CJOJPJQJaJ5�6�CJOJQJaJCJOJQJaJ6�OJQJhÕ[96�H*OJQJ6�H*OJQJhÕ[9hÕ[9H*OJQJhÕ[9OJQJhÕ[9H*OJQJhÕ[9OJPJQJOJQJhÕ[9CJ(OJPJQJRS¹þÿ ùúH [Some characters in this reference could not be displayed correctly — please refer to the published PDF for the full reference.]
How to cite this paper
@article{1708274,
author = {Onwubiko, Davidson Chisom, Odikwa, Ndubuisi Henry, Ukabuiro, Ikenna Kelechi, Agomah, Stella Adaugo},
title = {Navigating The Complexities of AI-Generated Media: A Digital Forensic Perspective},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {11},
pages = {348-355},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708274.pdf},
abstract = {The latest expansion of AI media provides an entirely new set of hurdles to digital forensic investigations. This paper will discuss the challenges of analyzing and verifying AI media from a digital forensic point of view. By discussing how different forms of AI techniques and tools are used to create media, this research examines the complexity of differentiating authentic from unauthentic content. Additionally, it discusses the implications of AI-generated media on the authenticity of digital evidence presented in court and what it means for the court process. Utilizing case studies and methods, this research also offers strategies and approaches to navigating the challenges of AI-generated media within the field of digital forensics. By understanding the challenges presented by AI-generated media, forensic users can improve their ability to detect and account for AI-generated content when determining reliability and authenticity when considering digital evidence in an AI-dominated world.},
keywords = {AI-generated, investigation, Deepfake, artificial intelligence},
month = {May},
}