Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708335
Leadership Dynamics: A Comparative Study of Public Sector and Academic Setting
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Comparative Leadership Studies
Abstract
This study compares leadership styles in public sector organizations and academic institutions to understand how they affect organizational success and employee satisfaction. Leadership in the public sector is often strict and focused on following policies and maintaining order due to its hierarchical structure. In contrast, leadership in academia values collaboration, creativity, and intellectual freedom, encouraging a more flexible and supportive approach. Using a quantitative method, this research collects data through surveys from leaders and employees in both sectors, including government officials, university administrators, faculty, and staff. The study examines different leadership styles, such as transformational leadership, which inspires and motivates; transactional leadership, which focuses on rules and rewards; and servant leadership, which emphasizes trust and teamwork. Statistical tools will analyze the data to find patterns and connections between leadership styles and outcomes like job satisfaction and productivity. The study expects to find that public sector leaders mostly use directive and transactional styles for control and efficiency, while academic leaders prefer transformational styles to encourage innovation and collaboration. The findings aim to provide practical recommendations for improving leadership effectiveness and offer insights to develop leadership programs suited to each sector's unique needs.
References
[1] Aduna, J. R., Agustin, E. J. T., Canonero, C. M. D., Florencondia, N. T., & Natividad, L. O. (2023). Assessment of transformational leadership characteristics for the leaders of ECSD Design+ Build.
[2] Arias, C. A. P., Miranda, S. F. S., Paguinto, J. A. S., & Pangkubit, R. J. M. (2025). HandSnap++: An Android application for debugging handwritten C++ code using image processing through optical character recognition and compiler. Malaysia Journal of Invention and Innovation, 4(4), 10–29.
[3] Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
[4] Bognot, M. J., Wy, A. F., Merciales, M. F., Florencondia, N., & Jomar, J. (2023). Leadership: A case study analysis of the leadership style in Aurora State College of Technology. International Journal of Progressive Research in Science and Engineering, 4(01).
[5] Delos Santos, M. C. S., Mallari, A. I., Sabroso, K. D. A., Simbulan, R. F., Mallari, M. O., & others. (2025). ArtChain: GUHIT Pinas’ centralized art management system with blockchain technology. APS, 58.
[6] Elenkov, D. S., Judge, W., & Wright, P. (2005). Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: An international multi-cluster comparative study. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.469
[7] Fernando, J. G., Endaya, M. J. L., Mallari, M. O., & Cuison, L. T. (2022). The efficacy of a third-party enterprise system in state universities and colleges (SUC) setting. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7773–7780.
[8] Frigillana, K. G., Muldong, R. M. C., Tiongson, H. T., Aduna, J. R., & Florencondia, N. T. (2023). Assessment of Holy Angel University–School of Engineering and Architecture administrators as transformational and servant leaders.
[9] Geronimo, J. P. A., & Mallari, M. O. (2025). Propelling rural communities: The impact of solar-powered irrigation systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 8(7), 108–122.
[10] Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness (25th Anniversary ed.). Paulist Press.
[11] Gomez Jr., R. H., Mallari, M. O., Asignacion, A. P., John, R., De Lara, L., & others. (2020). Assessment and forecasting of transformer percent loading of a private educational institution. Assessment, 7(15), 6673–6684.
[12] Ladores Jr., C., Estacio, I., Manzon, R. D., & Florencondia, N. (2023). Leadership styles of construction professionals and their preferred labor system in the Philippine construction industry. The Quest: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(3).
[13] Mallari, M. O., Castro, E. Q., & De Lara, R. J. L. (2020). ABOMICS: An automated body mass index computing system applied on learning institutions. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(15), 6685–6696.
[14] Ng, K. Y., Ang, S., & Chan, K. Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733
How to cite this paper
@article{1708335,
author = {Mary Joy V. Nilo, Edward Joseph C. Dungca, Marvin O. Mallari, Noel T. Florencondia},
title = {Leadership Dynamics: A Comparative Study of Public Sector and Academic Setting},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {11},
pages = {317-326},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708335.pdf},
abstract = {This study compares leadership styles in public sector organizations and academic institutions to understand how they affect organizational success and employee satisfaction. Leadership in the public sector is often strict and focused on following policies and maintaining order due to its hierarchical structure. In contrast, leadership in academia values collaboration, creativity, and intellectual freedom, encouraging a more flexible and supportive approach. Using a quantitative method, this research collects data through surveys from leaders and employees in both sectors, including government officials, university administrators, faculty, and staff. The study examines different leadership styles, such as transformational leadership, which inspires and motivates; transactional leadership, which focuses on rules and rewards; and servant leadership, which emphasizes trust and teamwork. Statistical tools will analyze the data to find patterns and connections between leadership styles and outcomes like job satisfaction and productivity. The study expects to find that public sector leaders mostly use directive and transactional styles for control and efficiency, while academic leaders prefer transformational styles to encourage innovation and collaboration. The findings aim to provide practical recommendations for improving leadership effectiveness and offer insights to develop leadership programs suited to each sector's unique needs.},
month = {May},
}