International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708349

1708349 Vol 4 · Issue 8 Download Paper

Advances in Stakeholder-Centric Product Lifecycle Management for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Energy Program Ecosystems

Oyinomomo-emi Emmanuel Akpe Jeffrey Chidera Ogeawuchi Abraham Ayodeji Abayomi Oluwademilade Aderemi Agboola

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Multi-Stakeholder Energy Ecosystems

Abstract

The evolution of energy systems toward decentralization, sustainability, and digitalization has amplified the need for stakeholder-centric approaches to product lifecycle management (PLM). This paper presents a comprehensive framework for understanding and implementing stakeholder-centric PLM in complex, multi-stakeholder energy program ecosystems. Beginning with a theoretical foundation, the paper defines the unique lifecycle stages within the energy sector and situates PLM within stakeholder theory, systems thinking, and ecosystem governance. It then examines stakeholder identification, engagement strategies, and co-creation mechanisms that enable shared value creation beyond traditional financial metrics. The study further explores the integration of lifecycle planning tools, digital twins, and data governance structures to facilitate evidence-based decision-making and regulatory compliance. Key challenges, including organizational resistance, technological fragmentation, and policy misalignment, are critically analyzed alongside enabling technologies and collaborative infrastructures. Finally, the paper offers strategic recommendations for advancing stakeholder-centric PLM, emphasizing innovation pathways, institutional capacity building, and a roadmap for cross-sectoral transformation. By synthesizing conceptual, operational, and strategic dimensions, this work contributes a forward-looking model for enhancing lifecycle sustainability, stakeholder inclusivity, and governance efficacy in modern energy programs.

Keywords

Multi-Stakeholder Energy Ecosystems, Value Co-Creation, Digital Twins and Lifecycle Integration, Governance and Regulatory Alignment, Circular Economy in Energy Systems

References

[1] K. Menon, H. Kärkkäinen, T. Wuest, and J. P. Gupta, "Industrial internet platforms: A conceptual evaluation from a product lifecycle management perspective," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 233, no. 5, pp. 1390-1401, 2019.

[2] L. Lämmer and M. Theiss, "Product lifecycle management," Concurrent Engineering in the 21st Century: Foundations, Developments and Challenges, pp. 455-490, 2015.

[3] H. Maddern, P. A. Smart, R. S. Maull, and S. Childe, "End-to-end process management: implications for theory and practice," Production Planning & Control, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 1303- 1321, 2014.

[4] F. Ferreira, J. Faria, A. Azevedo, and A. L. Marques, "Product lifecycle management in knowledge intensive collaborative environments: An application to automotive industry," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1474-1487, 2017.

[5] H. Salameh, "What, when, why, and how? A comparison between agile project management and traditional project management methods," International Journal of Business and Management Review, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 52-74, 2014.

[6] R. Moro Visconti, "Combining network theory with corporate governance: Converging models for connected stakeholders," Corporate Ownership & Control, no. 17 (1), pp. 1-15, 2019.

[7] J. Hörisch, R. E. Freeman, and S. Schaltegger, "Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework," Organization & environment, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 328-346, 2014.

[8] B. Freudenreich, F. Lüdeke-Freund, and S. Schaltegger, "A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability," Journal of business ethics, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 3-18, 2020.

[9] Y. Y. Haimes, Modeling and managing interdependent complex systems of systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

[10] A. S. R. Subramanian, T. Gundersen, and T. A. Adams, "Modeling and simulation of energy systems: A review," Processes, vol. 6, no. 12, p. 238, 2018.

[11] S. Bolwig et al., "Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 101, pp. 440-452, 2019.

[12] D. Gianni, A. D'Ambrogio, and A. Tolk, Modeling and simulation-based systems engineering handbook. CRC press, 2014.

[13] W. Elsner, "Complexity economics as heterodoxy: theory and policy," Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 939-978, 2017.

[14] A. J. Timmis, "A stakeholder approach to sustainable development in UK aviation," University of Sheffield, 2015.

[15] I. H. Osman and A. L. Anouze, "A cognitive analytics management framework (CAM-Part 1): SAMAS components, leadership, frontier performance growth, and sustainable shared value," in Decision Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications: IGI Global, 2017, pp. 151-227.

[16] M. M. Fritz, R. Rauter, R. J. Baumgartner, and N. Dentchev, "A supply chain perspective of stakeholder identification as a tool for responsible policy and decision-making," Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 81, pp. 63- 76, 2018.

[17] M. Janssen and N. Helbig, "Innovating and changing the policy-cycle: Policy-makers be prepared!," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. S99-S105, 2018.

[18] A. Newton and M. Elliott, "A typology of stakeholders and guidelines for engagement in transdisciplinary, participatory processes," Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 3, p. 230, 2016.

[19] S. Jetoo, "Stakeholder engagement for inclusive climate governance: the case of the city of Turku," Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 21, p. 6080, 2019.

[20] B. T. Wood, A. J. Dougill, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer, "Exploring power and procedural justice within climate compatible development project design: Whose priorities are being considered?," The Journal of Environment & Development, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 363-395, 2016.

[21] J. P. S. Barletti, A. M. Larson, C. Hewlett, and D. Delgado, "Designing for engagement: A Realist Synthesis Review of how context affects the outcomes of multi-stakeholder forums on land use and/or land-use change," World Development, vol. 127, p. 104753, 2020.

[22] J. Herberg, T. Haas, D. Oppold, and D. von Schneidemesser, "A collaborative transformation beyond coal and cars? Co- creation and corporatism in the German energy and mobility transitions," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 3278, 2020.

[23] P. Jones, "Contexts of co-creation: Designing with system stakeholders," Systemic design: Theory, methods, and practice, pp. 3-52, 2018.

[24] O. Shafqat, E. Malakhatka, N. Chrobot, and P. Lundqvist, "End use energy services framework co-creation with multiple stakeholders—a living lab-based case study," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 7565, 2021.

[25] B. Ryszawska, M. Rozwadowska, R. Ulatowska, M. Pierzchała, and P. Szymański, "The power of Co-creation in the energy transition—DART model in citizen energy communities projects," Energies, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 5266, 2021.

[26] S. M. C. Loureiro, J. Romero, and R. G. Bilro, "Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study," Journal of Business Research, vol. 119, pp. 388-409, 2020.

[27] X. Y. Wang and J. R. Whitworth, "Using additive manufacturing to mitigate the risks of limited key ship components of the Zumwalt -class destroyer," Acquisition Research Program, 2016.

[28] E. P. Koumoulos et al., "Research and development in carbon fibers and advanced high- performance composites supply chain in Europe: A roadmap for challenges and the industrial uptake," Journal of Composites Science, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 86, 2019.

[29] K. Zitelman, K. Verclas, and S. Cramer, "User Objectives and Design Approaches for Microgrids: Options for Delivering Reliability and Resilience, Clean Energy, Energy Savings, and Other Priorities," National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Washington, DC …, 2021.

[30] S. Lakkala, "Stakeholder management and prioritization in a Positive Energy District project," S. Lakkala, 2020.

[31] S. Agostinelli, F. Cumo, G. Guidi, and C. Tomazzoli, "Cyber-physical systems improving building energy management: Digital twin and artificial intelligence," Energies, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 2338, 2021.

[32] A. Rasheed, O. San, and T. Kvamsdal, "Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective," IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 21980-22012, 2020.

[33] N. S. Egbuhuzor, A. J. Ajayi, E. E. Akhigbe, O. Agbede, C. Ewim, and D. Ajiga, "Cloud-based CRM systems: Revolutionizing customer engagement in the financial sector with artificial intelligence," International Journal of Science and Research Archive, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 215-234, 2021.

[34] C. P.-M. Ewim, H. E. Omokhoa, I. A. Ogundeji, and A. I. Ibeh, "Future of Work in Banking: Adapting Workforce Skills to Digital Transformation Challenges," Future, vol. 2, no. 1, 2021.

[35] K. O. Ogunsola, E. D. Balogun, and A. S. Ogunmokun, "Enhancing Financial Integrity Through an Advanced Internal Audit Risk Assessment and Governance Model," 2021.

[36] E. O. ALONGE, N. L. EYO -UDO, B. CHIBUNNA, A. I. D. UBANADU, E. D. BALOGUN, and K. O. OGUNSOLA, "Digital Transformation in Retail Banking to Enhance Customer Experience and Profitability," 2021.

[37] E. O. Alonge, N. L. Eyo-Udo, B. C. Ubanadu, A. I. Daraojimba, E. D. Balogun, and K. O. Ogunsola, "Enhancing Data Security with Machine Learning: A Study on Fraud Detection Algorithms," Journal of Data Security and Fraud Prevention, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 105-118, 2021.

[38] B. I. Adekunle, E. C. Chukwuma-Eke, E. D. Balogun, and K. O. Ogunsola, "Machine Learning for Automation: Developing Data- Driven Solutions for Process Optimization and Accuracy Improvement," Machine Learning, vol. 2, no. 1, 2021.

[39] B. O. Tomoh, A. Y. Mustapha, A. O. Mbata, M. C. Kelvin-Agwu, A. Y. Forkuo, and T. O. Kolawole, "Assessing the impact of telehealth interventions on rural healthcare accessibility: a quantitative study."

[40] B. I. Adekunle, E. C. Chukwuma-Eke, E. D. Balogun, and K. O. Ogunsola, "Predictive Analytics for Demand Forecasting: Enhancing Business Resource Allocation Through Time Series Models," 2021.

[41] N. J. Sam-Bulya, H. E. Omokhoa, C. P.-M. Ewim, and G. O. Achumie, "Developing a Framework for Artificial Intelligence-Driven Financial Inclusion in Emerging Markets."

[42] O. S. Soyege et al., "Evaluating the impact of health informatics on patient care and outcomes: A detailed review."

[43] C. N. Nwokedi et al., "Addressing healthcare disparities: Tackling socioeconomic and racial inequities in access to medical services."

[44] K. J. Olowe, N. L. Edoh, S. J. C. Zouo, and J. Olamijuwon, "Review of predictive modeling and machine learning applications in financial service analysis."

[45] D. O. Olutimehin, T. O. Falaiye, C. P.-M. Ewim, and A. I. Ibeh, "Developing a Framework for Digital Transformation in Retail Banking Operations."

[46] T. S. Oyetunji, F. L. Erinjogunola, R. O. Ajirotutu, A. B. Adeyemi, T. C. Ohakawa, and S. A. Adio, "Designing Smart Building Management Systems for Sustainable and Cost- Efficient Housing."

[47] D. I. Ajiga, O. Hamza, A. Eweje, E. Kokogho, and P. E. Odio, "Data-Driven Strategies for Enhancing Student Success in Underserved US Communities."

[48] E. O. Alonge and E. D. Balogun, "Innovative Strategies in Fixed Income Trading: Transforming Global Financial Markets."

[49] M. C. Kelvin-Agwu, M. O. Adelodun, G. T. Igwama, and E. C. Anyanwu, "Enhancing Biomedical Engineering Education: Incorporating Practical Training in Equipment Installation and Maintenance."

[50] N. L. Majebi, M. O. Adelodun, and E. Chinyere, "Community-Based Interventions to Prevent Child Abuse and Neglect: A Policy Perspective."

How to cite this paper

Oyinomomo-emi Emmanuel Akpe, Jeffrey Chidera Ogeawuchi, Abraham Ayodeji Abayomi, Oluwademilade Aderemi Agboola "Advances in Stakeholder-Centric Product Lifecycle Management for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Energy Program Ecosystems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 4 Issue 8 2021 Page 179-188
Oyinomomo-emi Emmanuel Akpe, Jeffrey Chidera Ogeawuchi, Abraham Ayodeji Abayomi, Oluwademilade Aderemi Agboola "Advances in Stakeholder-Centric Product Lifecycle Management for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Energy Program Ecosystems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 4, no. 8, Feb. 2021
Oyinomomo-emi Emmanuel Akpe, Jeffrey Chidera Ogeawuchi, Abraham Ayodeji Abayomi, Oluwademilade Aderemi Agboola (2021). Advances in Stakeholder-Centric Product Lifecycle Management for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Energy Program Ecosystems. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 4(8).
Oyinomomo-emi Emmanuel Akpe, Jeffrey Chidera Ogeawuchi, Abraham Ayodeji Abayomi, Oluwademilade Aderemi Agboola "Advances in Stakeholder-Centric Product Lifecycle Management for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Energy Program Ecosystems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 4, no. 8, Feb. 2021.
@article{1708349,
      author = {Oyinomomo-emi Emmanuel Akpe, Jeffrey Chidera Ogeawuchi, Abraham Ayodeji Abayomi, Oluwademilade Aderemi Agboola},
      title = {Advances in Stakeholder-Centric Product Lifecycle Management for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Energy Program Ecosystems},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2021},
      volume = {4},
      number = {8},
      pages = {179-188},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708349.pdf},
      abstract = {The evolution of energy systems toward decentralization, sustainability, and digitalization has amplified the need for stakeholder-centric approaches to product lifecycle management (PLM). This paper presents a comprehensive framework for understanding and implementing stakeholder-centric PLM in complex, multi-stakeholder energy program ecosystems. Beginning with a theoretical foundation, the paper defines the unique lifecycle stages within the energy sector and situates PLM within stakeholder theory, systems thinking, and ecosystem governance. It then examines stakeholder identification, engagement strategies, and co-creation mechanisms that enable shared value creation beyond traditional financial metrics. The study further explores the integration of lifecycle planning tools, digital twins, and data governance structures to facilitate evidence-based decision-making and regulatory compliance. Key challenges, including organizational resistance, technological fragmentation, and policy misalignment, are critically analyzed alongside enabling technologies and collaborative infrastructures. Finally, the paper offers strategic recommendations for advancing stakeholder-centric PLM, emphasizing innovation pathways, institutional capacity building, and a roadmap for cross-sectoral transformation. By synthesizing conceptual, operational, and strategic dimensions, this work contributes a forward-looking model for enhancing lifecycle sustainability, stakeholder inclusivity, and governance efficacy in modern energy programs.},
      keywords = {Multi-Stakeholder Energy Ecosystems, Value Co-Creation, Digital Twins and Lifecycle Integration, Governance and Regulatory Alignment, Circular Economy in Energy Systems},
      month = {February},
  }