Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708526
A Conceptual Model for Cross-Functional Collaboration Between IT and Business Units in Cloud Projects
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Cross-Functional Collaboration
Abstract
In today?s rapidly evolving digital landscape, the effective implementation of cloud projects requires seamless collaboration between Information Technology (IT) departments and business units. However, organizational silos, misaligned goals, and communication barriers often hinder productive synergy, resulting in project delays, budget overruns, and suboptimal outcomes. This paper presents a conceptual model designed to enhance cross-functional collaboration between IT and business units during cloud project lifecycles. The model is grounded in organizational theory, systems thinking, and agile project management principles, integrating key components such as shared governance, mutual accountability, real-time communication platforms, and continuous feedback loops. The proposed model delineates five interdependent layers: Strategic Alignment, Operational Integration, Knowledge Sharing, Collaborative Governance, and Performance Monitoring. Each layer is tailored to address specific challenges faced during cloud adoption and migration, ensuring that both technical and non-technical stakeholders contribute effectively to decision-making processes. Through the integration of cross-functional teams and cloud-native tools, the model fosters a culture of co-creation, transparency, and innovation. Empirical data from existing cloud transformation case studies support the need for such a model, highlighting critical points where misalignment between IT and business priorities led to project failure or inefficiency. The model also incorporates change management strategies to address resistance and improve stakeholder engagement. Emphasis is placed on dynamic role definitions, where IT professionals develop business acumen, and business leaders acquire digital literacy, thereby bridging competency gaps. The paper concludes by outlining a roadmap for implementing the model, including the establishment of collaborative KPIs, structured communication protocols, and integrated training programs. The anticipated outcomes include improved project agility, higher user satisfaction, reduced risks, and enhanced return on investment (ROI) in cloud initiatives. This conceptual framework serves as a valuable reference for CIOs, business executives, project managers, and organizational strategists seeking to optimize cloud project execution through effective cross-functional collaboration.
Keywords
Cross-Functional Collaboration, IT-Business Alignment, Cloud Project Management, Digital Transformation, Conceptual Framework, Strategic Alignment, Agile Methodology, Collaborative Governance, Cloud Adoption, Business-IT Synergy.
References
[1] Adenfelt, M. and Lagerström, K. (2006). Enabling knowledge creation and sharing in transnational projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(3), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.09.003
[2] Aksoy, M. and Algawiaz, D. (2014). Knowledge management in the cloud: benefits and risks. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 3(11), 718-720. https://doi.org/10.7753/ijcatr0311.1013
[3] Alhamazani, K., Ranjan, R., Jayaraman, P., Mitra, K., Liu, C., Rabhi, F., … & Wang, L. (2019). Cross-layer multi-cloud real-time application qos monitoring and benchmarking as-a-service framework. Ieee Transactions on Cloud Computing, 7(1), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcc.2015.2441715
[4] AL-Shboul, M. (2018). Towards better understanding of determinants logistical factors in smes for cloud erp adoption in developing economies. Business Process Management Journal, 25(5), 887-907. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-01-2018-0004
[5] Antonaya, S., Santos, C., & Gallardo, J. (2014). Handling human factors in cloud-based collaborative enterprise information systems.. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004972801620167
[6] Artto, K. and Dietrich, P. (2004). Strategic business management through multiple projects., 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172391.ch7
[7] Artto, K., Kujala, J., Dietrich, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2008). What is project strategy?. International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.006
[8] Bechini, A., Cimino, M., Marcelloni, F., & Tomasi, A. (2008). Patterns and technologies for enabling supply chain traceability through collaborative e-business. Information and Software Technology, 50(4), 342-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.017
[9] Bose, R. (2006). Understanding management data systems for enterprise performance management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610640988
[10] Brattström, A. and Richtnér, A. (2013). Good cop–bad cop: trust, control, and the lure of integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 584-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12115
[11] Brocke, J. and Rosemann, M. (2015). Business process management., 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom070213
[12] Burn, J. (1996). Is innovation and organizational alignment – a professional juggling act. Journal of Information Technology, 11(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/026839629601100101
[13] Busi, M. and Bititci, U. (2006). Collaborative performance management: present gaps and future research. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610635471
[14] Buyya, R., Yeo, C., & Venugopal, S. (2008). Market-oriented cloud computing: vision, hype, and reality for delivering it services as computing utilities., 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/hpcc.2008.172
[15] Calabrò, A., Lonetti, F., & Marchetti, E. (2015). Kpi evaluation of the business process execution through event monitoring activity.. https://doi.org/10.1109/es.2015.23
[16] Calabrò, A., Lonetti, F., Marchetti, E., & Spagnolo, G. (2016). Enhancing business process performance analysis through coverage-based monitoring.. https://doi.org/10.1109/quatic.2016.015
[17] Carrión, A., Caballer, M., Blanquer, I., Kotowski, N., Jardim, R., & Dávila, A. (2017). Managing workflows on top of a cloud computing orchestrator for using heterogeneous environments on e-science. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 13(4), 375. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwgs.2017.087326
[18] Dutta, A., Peng, G., & Choudhary, A. (2013). Risks in enterprise cloud computing: the perspective of it experts. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645649
[19] Dutta, A., Peng, G., & Choudhary, A. (2013). Risks in enterprise cloud computing: the perspective of it experts. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645649
[20] Emden, Z., Calantone, R., & Dröge, C. (2006). Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 330-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00205.x
[21] Emden, Z., Calantone, R., & Dröge, C. (2006). Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 330-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00205.x
[22] Faizi, S. and Rahman, S. (2019). Securing cloud computing through it governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3360869
[23] Faizi, S. and Rahman, S. (2019). Securing cloud computing through it governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3360869
[24] Ferreira, P., Shamsuzzoha, A., Toscano, C., & Cunha, P. (2012). Framework for performance measurement and management in a collaborative business environment. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(6), 672-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211249210
[25] Ferreira, P., Shamsuzzoha, A., Toscano, C., & Cunha, P. (2012). Framework for performance measurement and management in a collaborative business environment. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(6), 672-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211249210
[26] Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Karagiannis, D., Thoenssen, B., Merwe, A., & Woitsch, R. (2016). A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and it: combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology. Computers in Industry, 79, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.009
[27] Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Karagiannis, D., Thoenssen, B., Merwe, A., & Woitsch, R. (2016). A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and it: combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology. Computers in Industry, 79, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.009
[28] Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
[29] Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
[30] Holland, S., Gaston, K., & Gomes, J. (2000). Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development. International journal of management reviews, 2(3), 231-259.
[31] Huang, L., Liu, F., & Liu, C. (2013). Design and research on collaborative learning program based on cloud-services. Advanced Materials Research, 756-759, 1199-1203. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.756-759.1199
[32] Huang, L., Liu, F., & Liu, C. (2013). Design and research on collaborative learning program based on cloud-services. Advanced Materials Research, 756-759, 1199-1203. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.756-759.1199
[33] Idris, A. A., Asokere, A. S., Ajemunigbohun, S. S., Oreshile, A. S., & Olutade, E. O. (2012). An empirical study of the efficacy of marketing communication mix elements in selected insurance companies in Nigeria. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 2(5), 8.
[34] Kang, B., Kim, D., & Kang, S. (2012). Periodic performance prediction for real‐time business process monitoring. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211193617
[35] King, G., Thomson, N., Rothstein, M., Kingsnorth, S., & Parker, K. (2016). Integrating research, clinical care, and education in academic health science centers. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 30(7), 1140-1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-11-2015-0177
[36] Law, K., Cheng, J., Fruchter, R., & Sriram, R. (2016). Engineering applications of the cloud., 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118821930.ch40
[37] Li-Ren, Y. (2013). Implementation of cloud platform to improve project performance.. https://doi.org/10.2991/ccis-13.2013.13
[38] Luca, L. and Atuahene‐Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.095
[39] Luftman, J. (2003). Assessing it - business alignment.. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420031393.ch1
[40] Luftman, J. (2003). Assessing it - business alignment.. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420031393.ch1
[41] Manikandasaran, S. S. (2016). Cloud computing with data confidentiality issues. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 5(1), 97-100.
[42] Mateo, R., Yang, H., & Lee, J. (2012). Collaboration framework based on social semantic web for cloud systems. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 13(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2012.13.1.65
[43] McGregor, C. and Schiefer, J. (2004). A web-service based framework for analyzing and measuring business performance. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-003-0027-x
[44] McGregor, C. and Schiefer, J. (2004). A web-service based framework for analyzing and measuring business performance. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-003-0027-x
[45] Melander, L. (2017). Achieving sustainable development by collaborating in green product innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1095-1109. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1970
[46] Melander, L. (2017). Achieving sustainable development by collaborating in green product innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1095-1109. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1970
[47] Milosevic, D. and Srivannaboon, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business strategy. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700310
[48] Milosevic, D. and Srivannaboon, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business strategy. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700310
[49] Min, L., Zhao, D., & Yu, Y. (2015). Toe drivers for cloud transformation: direct or trust-mediated?. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(2), 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-03-2014-0040
[50] Mohamed, M., Stankosky, M., & Murray, A. (2004). Applying knowledge management principles to enhance cross‐functional team performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410541097
[51] Mohamed, M., Stankosky, M., & Murray, A. (2004). Applying knowledge management principles to enhance cross‐functional team performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410541097
[52] Momm, C., Gebhart, M., & Abeck, S. (2009). A model-driven approach for monitoring business performance in web service compositions., 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1109/iciw.2009.57
[53] Momm, C., Gebhart, M., & Abeck, S. (2009). A model-driven approach for monitoring business performance in web service compositions., 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1109/iciw.2009.57
[54] Mustapha, S. D., Adeoye, B. A. I., & AbdulWahab, R. (2017). Estimation of drivers’ critical gap acceptance and follow-up time at four-legged unsignalized intersection. CARD International Journal of Science and Advanced Innovative Research, 1(1), 98-107. CARD International Journal of Science and Advanced Innovative Research.
[55] Norta, A. and Grefen, P. (2007). Discovering patterns for inter-organizational business process collaboration. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 16(03n04), 507-544. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218843007001664
[56] Nussbaumer, N. and Liu, X. (2013). Cloud migration for smes in a service oriented approach., 457-462. https://doi.org/10.1109/compsacw.2013.71
[57] Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and Analytical Approaches. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148790
[58] Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and Analytical Approaches. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148790
[59] Olamijuwon, O. J. (2020). Real-time Vision-based Driver Alertness Monitoring using Deep Neural Network Architectures (Master's thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (South Africa)).
[60] Olutade, E. O. (2020). Social media as a marketing strategy to influence young consumers' attitude towards fast-moving consumer goods: a comparative study (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South Africa)).
[61] Olutade, E. O., & Chukwuere, J. E. (2020). Greenwashing as Influencing Factor to Brand Switching Behavior Among Generation Y in the Social Media Age. In Green Marketing as a Positive Driver Toward Business Sustainability (pp. 219-248). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
[62] Olutade, E. O., Potgieter, M., & Adeogun, A. W. (2019). Effect of social media platforms as marketing strategy of achieving organisational marketing goals and objectives aong innovative consumers: Acomparative study. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 8(1), 213-228.
[63] Oprins, R., Frijns, H., & Stettina, C. (2019). Evolution of scrum transcending business domains and the future of agile project management., 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19034-7_15
[64] Oxley, J. and Pandher, G. (2015). Equity‐based incentives and collaboration in the modern multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1379-1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2392
[65] Oxley, J. and Pandher, G. (2015). Equity‐based incentives and collaboration in the modern multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1379-1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2392
[66] Paletta, M. and Herrero, P. (2010). An awareness-based learning model to deal with service collaboration in cloud computing., 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15034-0_6
[67] Paletta, M. and Herrero, P. (2010). An awareness-based learning model to deal with service collaboration in cloud computing., 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15034-0_6
[68] Pan, H., Wu, C., & Lin, S. (2013). The preliminary discussion about key problems of cross-organizational business process collaboration. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 411-414, 2148-2151. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.411-414.2148
[69] Panagiotou, G. and Wijnen, R. (2005). The “telescopic observations” framework: an attainable strategic tool. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500510589912
[70] Park, J., An, G., & Chandra, D. (2007). Trusted p2p computing environments with role-based access control. Iet Information Security, 1(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs:20060084
[71] Pavlou, P. and Sawy, O. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
[72] Pearson, S. and Benameur, A. (2010). Privacy, security and trust issues arising from cloud computing., 693-702. https://doi.org/10.1109/cloudcom.2010.66
[73] Pearson, S. and Benameur, A. (2010). Privacy, security and trust issues arising from cloud computing., 693-702. https://doi.org/10.1109/cloudcom.2010.66
[74] Pellathy, D., Mollenkopf, D., Stank, T., & Autry, C. (2019). Cross‐functional integration: concept clarification and scale development. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(2), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12206
[75] Pellathy, D., Mollenkopf, D., Stank, T., & Autry, C. (2019). Cross‐functional integration: concept clarification and scale development. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(2), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12206
[76] Pérez, A., Moltó, G., Caballer, M., & Calatrava, A. (2018). Serverless computing for container-based architectures. Future Generation Computer Systems, 83, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.022
[77] Petrillo, A., Bona, G., Forcina, A., & Silvestri, A. (2018). Building excellence through the agile reengineering performance model (arpm). Business Process Management Journal, 24(1), 128-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-03-2016-0071
[78] Poberschnigg, T., Pimenta, M., & Hilletofth, P. (2020). How can cross-functional integration support the development of resilience capabilities? the case of collaboration in the automotive industry. Supply Chain Management an International Journal, 25(6), 789-801. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-10-2019-0390
[79] Poberschnigg, T., Pimenta, M., & Hilletofth, P. (2020). How can cross-functional integration support the development of resilience capabilities? the case of collaboration in the automotive industry. Supply Chain Management an International Journal, 25(6), 789-801. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-10-2019-0390
[80] Pope-Ruark, R. (2014). Introducing agile project management strategies in technical and professional communication courses. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(1), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651914548456
[81] Prange, C. and Hennig, A. (2019). From strategic planning to strategic agility patterns. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964319867778
[82] Radenković, B., Despotović-Zrakić, M., Bogdanović, Z., Vujin, V., & Barać, D. (2014). Harnessing cloud computing infrastructure for e-learning services. Facta universitatis-series: Electronics and Energetics, 27(3), 339-357.
[83] Rajpoot, Q., Jensen, C., & Krishnan, R. (2015). Attributes enhanced role-based access control model., 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22906-5_1
[84] Rajpoot, Q., Jensen, C., & Krishnan, R. (2015). Integrating attributes into role-based access control., 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20810-7_17
[85] Redmond, J. and Walker, E. (2008). A new approach to small business training: community based education. Education + Training, 50(8/9), 697-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810917073
[86] Ruotsala, R. (2014). Developing a tool for cross-functional collaboration: the trajectory of an annual clock. Outlines Critical Practice Studies, 15(2), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v15i2.16830
[87] Ruotsala, R. (2014). Developing a tool for cross-functional collaboration: the trajectory of an annual clock. Outlines Critical Practice Studies, 15(2), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v15i2.16830
[88] Sabherwal, R. and Chan, Y. (2001). Alignment between business and is strategies: a study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.1.11.9714
[89] Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., & Goles, T. (2001). The dynamics of alignment: insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science, 12(2), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.179.10113
[90] Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., & Goles, T. (2001). The dynamics of alignment: insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science, 12(2), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.179.10113
[91] Saini, H., Upadhyaya, A., & Khandelwal, M. (2019). Benefits of cloud computing for business enterprises: a review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3463631
[92] Salah, A., Ramadan, N., & Ahmed, H. (2017). Towards a hybrid approach for software project management using ontology alignment. International Journal of Computer Applications, 168(6), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017914438
[93] Sanders, N. (2007). An empirical study of the impact of e‐business technologies on organizational collaboration and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1332-1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.008
[94] Sandhu, R., Bhamidipati, V., Coyne, E., Ganta, S., & Youman, C. (1997). The arbac97 model for role-based administration of roles., 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1145/266741.266752
[95] Sandhu, R., Coyne, E., Feinstein, H., & Youman, C. (1996). Role-based access control models. Computer, 29(2), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.485845
[96] Sandhu, R., Ferraiolo, D., & Kühn, R. (2000). The nist model for role-based access control.. https://doi.org/10.1145/344287.344301
[97] Sarin, S. and McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross‐functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 707-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02350.x
[98] Senarathna, I., Wilkin, C., Warren, M., Yeoh, W., & Salzman, S. (2018). Factors that influence adoption of cloud computing: an empirical study of australian smes. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1603
[99] Shepperd, M. and Schofield, C. (1997). Estimating software project effort using analogies. Ieee Transactions on Software Engineering, 23(11), 736-743. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.637387
[100] Skafi, M., Yunis, M., & Zekri, A. (2020). Factors influencing smes’ adoption of cloud computing services in lebanon: an empirical analysis using toe and contextual theory. Ieee Access, 8, 79169-79181. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2987331
[101] Sow, M. and Aborbie, S. (2018). Impact of leadership on digital transformation. Business and Economic Research, 8(3), 139. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v8i3.13368
[102] Subashini, S. and Kavitha, V. (2011). A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2010.07.006
[103] Subashini, S. and Kavitha, V. (2011). A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2010.07.006
[104] Swink, M. and Schoenherr, T. (2014). The effects of cross‐functional integration on profitability, process efficiency, and asset productivity. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12070
[105] Swink, M. and Schoenherr, T. (2014). The effects of cross‐functional integration on profitability, process efficiency, and asset productivity. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12070
[106] Tereso, A., Ribeiro, P., Fernandes, G., Loureiro, I., & Ferreira, M. (2018). Project management practices in private organizations. Project Management Journal, 50(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818810966
[107] Trent, R. and Monczka, R. (1994). Effective cross‐functional sourcing teams: critical success factors. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.1994.tb00267.x
[108] Trent, R. and Monczka, R. (1994). Effective cross‐functional sourcing teams: critical success factors. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.1994.tb00267.x
[109] Tsai, K., Hsu, T., & Fang, W. (2011). Relinking cross‐functional collaboration, knowledge integration mechanisms, and product innovation performance: a moderated mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 29(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.192
[110] Valtakoski, A. and Järvi, K. (2016). Productization of knowledge-intensive services. Journal of Service Management, 27(3), 360-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-01-2015-0004
[111] Varshney, L. R., & Oppenheim, D. V. (2011). On cross-enterprise collaboration. In Business Process Management: 9th International Conference, BPM 2011, Clermont-Ferrand, France, August 30-September 2, 2011. Proceedings 9 (pp. 29-37). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[112] Vera-Baquero, A. and Molloy, O. (2012). A framework to support business process analytics.. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004178103210332
[113] Vrieze, P. and Xu, L. (2015). An analysis of resilience of a cloud based incident notification process., 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24141-8_10
[114] Wells, H. (2012). How effective are project management methodologies? an explorative evaluation of their benefits in practice. Project Management Journal, 43(6), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21302
[115] Wilson, B., Khazaei, B., & Hirsch, L. (2016). Towards a cloud migration decision support system for small and medium enterprises in tamil nadu.. https://doi.org/10.1109/cinti.2016.7846430
[116] Wu, D., Thames, J., Rosen, D., & Schaefer, D. (2012). Towards a cloud-based design and manufacturing paradigm: looking backward, looking forward., 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2012-70780
[117] Yigitbasioglu, O. (2015). The role of institutional pressures and top management support in the intention to adopt cloud computing solutions. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(4), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-09-2014-0087
[118] Zdravković, J. & Johanesson, P. (2004). Cooperation of processes through message level agreement., 564-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25975-6_40
[119] Zota, R. and Fraţilă, L. (2013). Preliminary aspects in order to develop an efficient method for cloud implementation standardization.. https://doi.org/10.1109/roedunet.2013.6714198
How to cite this paper
@article{1708526,
author = {Oyinomomo-emi Emmanuel Akpe, Samuel Owoade, Bright Chibunna Ubanadu, Andrew Ifesinachi Daraojimba, Toluwase Peter Gbenle},
title = {A Conceptual Model for Cross-Functional Collaboration Between IT and Business Units in Cloud Projects},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2020},
volume = {4},
number = {6},
pages = {99-115},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708526.pdf},
abstract = {In today?s rapidly evolving digital landscape, the effective implementation of cloud projects requires seamless collaboration between Information Technology (IT) departments and business units. However, organizational silos, misaligned goals, and communication barriers often hinder productive synergy, resulting in project delays, budget overruns, and suboptimal outcomes. This paper presents a conceptual model designed to enhance cross-functional collaboration between IT and business units during cloud project lifecycles. The model is grounded in organizational theory, systems thinking, and agile project management principles, integrating key components such as shared governance, mutual accountability, real-time communication platforms, and continuous feedback loops. The proposed model delineates five interdependent layers: Strategic Alignment, Operational Integration, Knowledge Sharing, Collaborative Governance, and Performance Monitoring. Each layer is tailored to address specific challenges faced during cloud adoption and migration, ensuring that both technical and non-technical stakeholders contribute effectively to decision-making processes. Through the integration of cross-functional teams and cloud-native tools, the model fosters a culture of co-creation, transparency, and innovation. Empirical data from existing cloud transformation case studies support the need for such a model, highlighting critical points where misalignment between IT and business priorities led to project failure or inefficiency. The model also incorporates change management strategies to address resistance and improve stakeholder engagement. Emphasis is placed on dynamic role definitions, where IT professionals develop business acumen, and business leaders acquire digital literacy, thereby bridging competency gaps. The paper concludes by outlining a roadmap for implementing the model, including the establishment of collaborative KPIs, structured communication protocols, and integrated training programs. The anticipated outcomes include improved project agility, higher user satisfaction, reduced risks, and enhanced return on investment (ROI) in cloud initiatives. This conceptual framework serves as a valuable reference for CIOs, business executives, project managers, and organizational strategists seeking to optimize cloud project execution through effective cross-functional collaboration.},
keywords = {Cross-Functional Collaboration, IT-Business Alignment, Cloud Project Management, Digital Transformation, Conceptual Framework, Strategic Alignment, Agile Methodology, Collaborative Governance, Cloud Adoption, Business-IT Synergy.},
month = {December},
}