Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708737
Techno-Economic Assessment of Energy Storage Systems for Grid-Tied Solar Installations in Industrial Zones: A United States Perspective
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: ICT
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive techno-economic assessment of energy storage systems (ESS) for grid-tied solar photovoltaic (PV) installations in industrial zones across the United States. The study evaluates lithium-ion batteries, flow batteries, sodium-sulfur batteries, and compressed air energy storage (CAES) based on cost-effectiveness, reliability, performance characteristics, and grid stability impacts. Using data from 2022-2024 installations, we analyze capital expenditure, operational expenditure, round-trip efficiency, cycle life, and response time to determine optimal storage solutions for different industrial load profiles. Results indicate that while lithium-ion batteries dominate current deployments due to decreasing costs and high efficiency, vanadium flow batteries offer compelling advantages for long-duration storage needs in high-energy industrial applications despite higher upfront costs. The findings provide a decision-making framework for industrial stakeholders considering solar-plus-storage systems under current U.S. regulatory and incentive structures, particularly in light of the Inflation Reduction Act provisions.
Keywords
Energy storage systems, grid-tied solar, industrial applications, lithium-ion batteries, flow batteries, techno-economic analysis, grid stability
References
[1] Abbott, J., & Nishimura, S. (2023). Performance evaluation of vanadium redox flow batteries in high-temperature industrial environments. Journal of Energy Storage, 47, 103-118.
[2] Bhargava, L., & Cortez, R. (2024). Hybrid flywheel-supercapacitor systems for power quality management in precision manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 71(3), 2845-2857.
[3] BloombergNEF. (2024). Energy storage market outlook 2024. Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
[4] Davidson, K., & Cruz, M. (2024). Quantifying the combined impact of IRA tax credits on industrial energy storage economics. Energy Policy, 186, 113472.
[5] Dimitriou, P., & Chang, W. (2024). Criticality-based framework for matching energy storage technologies to industrial applications. Applied Energy, 355, 121890.
[6] DSIRE. (2024). Database of state incentives for renewables & efficiency. NC Clean Energy Technology Center.
[7] DOE. (2024). Energy storage grand challenge: 2024 storage market report. U.S. Department of Energy.
[8] Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2024). Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey.
[9] Ferguson, R., & Kapoor, A. (2023). Incorporating uncertainty in industrial storage investment decisions: A probabilistic LCOS framework. Journal of Energy Economics, 115, 106501.
[10] Gagnon, P., & Rivera, J. (2022). Standardized protocols for valuing resilience in industrial energy storage applications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL/TP-7A40-80933).
[11] Harrison, T., & Maldonado, J. (2023). Performance degradation of battery energy storage systems in industrial manufacturing environments. Journal of Power Sources, 550, 232642.
[12] Jenkins, C., Roberts, D., & Thompson, K. (2024). Market penetration of energy storage in U.S. industrial solar installations: Trends and barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 182, 113354.
[13] Kumar, A., & Washington, B. (2024). Advances in molten salt thermal energy storage for industrial process heat applications. Applied Thermal Engineering, 222, 120112.
[14] Lamont, D., & Fischer, T. (2022). Correlating manufacturing process characteristics with optimal energy storage specifications. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 142, 104013.
[15] Lazard. (2023). Lazard's levelized cost of storage analysis—Version 9.0. Lazard Ltd.
[16] Lee, J., & Gupta, V. (2023). Regional disparities in wholesale market value for energy storage across U.S. ISOs/RTOs. The Electricity Journal, 36(2), 107033.
[17] Martinez, C., & Kang, D. (2023). Beyond LCOS: Value-based assessment of industrial energy storage systems. Energy Economics, 117, 106224.
[18] Menendez, R., & Blackwell, S. (2024). Economic performance of early industrial adopters of combined solar-plus-storage systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, 138722.
[19] Nemet, G., Johnson, L., & Ramirez, V. (2023). Impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on energy storage deployment trajectories. Environmental Research Letters, 18(3), 034012.
[20] O'Donnell, P., & Miyazaki, T. (2024). Industrial storage value stacking: A comprehensive framework for manufacturing applications. Applied Energy, 345, 121305.
[21] Okafor, F., Peterson, M., & Wilson, A. (2022). Quantifying production losses from power quality issues in U.S. manufacturing sectors. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 62, 287-301.
[22] Patel, V., Singh, R., & Cooper, M. (2024). Duration requirements for energy storage in industrial solar applications. Renewable Energy, 210, 274-289.
[23] Peterson, B., & Singh, R. (2024). Interconnection barriers for industrial battery energy storage: Regional differences and procedural improvements. The Electricity Journal, 37(3), 107150.
[24] Rodgers, M., & Thompson, H. (2023). Adoption barriers for energy storage technologies in small and medium manufacturing enterprises. Energy Research & Social Science, 98, 102976.
[25] Sandoval, E., & Hughes, L. (2023). Emergence of industrial-specific utility tariffs for facilities with on-site generation and storage. Utilities Policy, 80, 101438.
[26] Schmidt, O., Melchior, S., Hawkes, A., & Staffell, I. (2023). Technological learning in alternative energy storage systems: Recent advances and future prospects. Progress in Energy, 5(2), 022001.
[27] Taylor, M., & Williams, J. (2024). Regional implementation disparities of FERC Orders 841 and 2222: Implications for storage project economics. Energy Law Journal, 45(1), 79-112.
[28] Tran, D., & Morales, K. (2024). Case studies in industrial resilience: Monetary valuation of backup power in manufacturing operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 236, 109513.
[29] Wilson, R., & Harris, C. (2023). Technical requirements for energy storage in industrial manufacturing applications. Journal of Energy Storage, 59, 106458.
[30] Winters, B., & Chen, T. (2024). Utility rate programs for industrial flexibility: From pilots to permanent offerings. The Electricity Journal, 37(2), 107143.
[31] Wood Mackenzie. (2019). U.S. energy storage monitor: 2019 year in review. Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables and the Energy Storage Association.
[32] Yamamoto, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Integration of thermal energy storage with solar PV in manufacturing applications. Applied Energy, 332, 120494.
[33] Zhang, M., & Rodriguez, S. (2023). Drivers of cost reduction in lithium-ion battery technology: A decomposition analysis. Energy Technology, 11(2), 2200786.
[34] Zimmerman, R., Parker, T., & Johnson, M. (2024). Cycling patterns and degradation rates of battery storage systems in U.S. industrial facilities. Journal of Power Sources, 574, 233184.
How to cite this paper
@article{1708737,
author = {Modupe Arowolo, Oluremi Funmilayo Hamid, Marvin Baptiste},
title = {Techno-Economic Assessment of Energy Storage Systems for Grid-Tied Solar Installations in Industrial Zones: A United States Perspective},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {8},
pages = {951-963},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708737.pdf},
abstract = {This paper presents a comprehensive techno-economic assessment of energy storage systems (ESS) for grid-tied solar photovoltaic (PV) installations in industrial zones across the United States. The study evaluates lithium-ion batteries, flow batteries, sodium-sulfur batteries, and compressed air energy storage (CAES) based on cost-effectiveness, reliability, performance characteristics, and grid stability impacts. Using data from 2022-2024 installations, we analyze capital expenditure, operational expenditure, round-trip efficiency, cycle life, and response time to determine optimal storage solutions for different industrial load profiles. Results indicate that while lithium-ion batteries dominate current deployments due to decreasing costs and high efficiency, vanadium flow batteries offer compelling advantages for long-duration storage needs in high-energy industrial applications despite higher upfront costs. The findings provide a decision-making framework for industrial stakeholders considering solar-plus-storage systems under current U.S. regulatory and incentive structures, particularly in light of the Inflation Reduction Act provisions.},
keywords = {Energy storage systems, grid-tied solar, industrial applications, lithium-ion batteries, flow batteries, techno-economic analysis, grid stability},
month = {February},
}