International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709627

1709627 Vol 9 · Issue 1 Download Paper

The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices on Organizational Performance: A Study of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria

Yawa Makeri Habila Benedict Anayochukwu Ozurumba A.B.C. Akujuobi Chijindu Promise Ubah

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Public Procurement

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effect of sustainable procurement practices on the organizational performance of selected manufacturing companies in Nigeria. The research arose from the need to understand how sustainability initiatives in procurement could impact key performance metrics such as financial outcomes, operational efficiency, market competitiveness, customer satisfaction, waste reduction, and corporate reputation. The study covered manufacturing firms such as Nestl?, Dangote Cement, Nigerian Breweries, and others, providing a comprehensive view of the manufacturing sector's approach to sustainability. Findings reveal that sustainable procurement practices have a significant positive impact on the financial performance of manufacturing companies. Cost reductions, increased revenue, and improved profitability were attributed to better supplier negotiations, enhanced marketability, and long-term cost savings. Operational efficiency was also positively affected, with streamlined processes and improved supply chain coordination due to sustainable sourcing. Companies noted that time management and supplier consistency have improved, leading to reduced delays and fewer disruptions. Additionally, sustainable procurement has helped companies achieve market differentiation, attracting new clients and enhancing long-term competitiveness. Regarding customer satisfaction and loyalty, sustainable procurement was found to foster trust and long-term relationships with customers. Positive feedback regarding sustainability initiatives has led to greater customer retention and loyalty. Furthermore, waste reduction and resource management have seen notable improvements, as companies now manage raw materials more efficiently and minimize waste through eco-friendly sourcing. This has also contributed to a reduction in their environmental footprint and enhanced corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts. In terms of corporate reputation, the adoption of sustainable procurement has positioned companies as responsible corporate citizens, enhancing their brand image. The study concluded that these practices are essential not only for improving financial and operational performance but also for gaining a competitive edge in the market and ensuring customer loyalty. Sustainable procurement is, therefore, a key driver for long-term success and market relevance. The study recommends that manufacturing companies continue to integrate these practices into their operations, and that policy makers? support such efforts through regulatory frameworks and incentives.

Keywords

Competitiveness, Organizational Performance, Procurement, Sustainability, Sustainable Procurement

References

[1] Belhadi, A., Kamble, S. S., Venkatesh, M., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Benkhati, I. (2022). Building supply chain resilience and efficiency through additive manufacturing: An ambidextrous perspective on the dynamic capability view. International Journal of Production Economics, 249, 108516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108516

[2] Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study. International journal of operations & production management, 31(4), 452-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119551

[3] Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European journal of operational research, 233(2), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032

[4] DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691229270-005

[5] Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746

[6] Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R., & Yuthas, K. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long rangeplanning, 48(1),3545.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.11.001

[7] Fernando, Y., Halili, M., Tseng, M. L., Tseng, J. W., & Lim, M. K. (2022). Sustainable social supply chain practices and firm social performance: Framework and empirical evidence. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32,160172.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.020

[8] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

[9] Glaveli, N. (2021). Corporate social responsibility toward stakeholders and customer loyalty: Investigating the roles of trust and customer identification with the company. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2019-0257

[10] Martin-Ortega, O., & O'Brien, C. M. (2017). Advancing respect for labour rights globally through public procurement. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1073

[11] National Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Nigerian manufacturing industry report.

[12] Ogunsanya, O. A., Aigbavboa, C. O., Thwala, D. W., & Edwards, D. J. (2022). Barriers to sustainable procurement in the Nigerian construction industry: an exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5),861872.https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1658697

[13] Rajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S., & Govindan, K. (2017). Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal ofcleanerproduction, 162,299314.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.026

[14] Schröder, P., Antonarakis, A. S., Brauer, J., Conteh, A., Kohsaka, R., Uchiyama, Y., & Pacheco, P. (2019). SDG 12: responsible consumption and production–Potential Benefits and impacts on forests and livelihoods. Sustainable development goals: their impacts on forests and people, 386-418.

[15] Schröder, P., Antonarakis, A. S., Brauer, J., Conteh, A., Kohsaka, R., Uchiyama, Y., & Pacheco, P. (2019). SDG 12: responsible consumption and production–Potential Benefits and impacts on forests and livelihoods. Sustainable development goals: their impacts on forests and people, 386-418.

[16] Sönnichsen, S. D., & Clement, J. (2020). Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement. Journal of cleanerproduction, 245,118901.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118901

[17] Steen, R., Haug, O. J., & Patriarca, R. (2024). Business continuity and resilience management: A conceptual framework. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(1), e12501.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12501

[18] Taghian, M., D’Souza, C., & Polonsky, M. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance. SocialResponsibilityJournal, 11(2),340-363.https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2012-0068

[19] Truant, E., Borlatto, E., Crocco, E., & Sahore, N. (2023). Environmental, social and governance issues in supply chains. A systematic review for business strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140024

[20] United Nations, (2015). Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/responsible-consumption-and-production

[21] Yadav, N., & Veettil, N. (2022). Developing a comprehensive business case for sustainability: an inductive study. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(6), 1335-1358. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2146

How to cite this paper

Yawa Makeri Habila, Benedict Anayochukwu Ozurumba, A.B.C. Akujuobi, Chijindu Promise Ubah "The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices on Organizational Performance: A Study of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 1 2025 Page 1699-1711
Yawa Makeri Habila, Benedict Anayochukwu Ozurumba, A.B.C. Akujuobi, Chijindu Promise Ubah "The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices on Organizational Performance: A Study of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 1, Jul. 2025
Yawa Makeri Habila, Benedict Anayochukwu Ozurumba, A.B.C. Akujuobi, Chijindu Promise Ubah (2025). The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices on Organizational Performance: A Study of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(1).
Yawa Makeri Habila, Benedict Anayochukwu Ozurumba, A.B.C. Akujuobi, Chijindu Promise Ubah "The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices on Organizational Performance: A Study of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 1, Jul. 2025.
@article{1709627,
      author = {Yawa Makeri Habila, Benedict Anayochukwu Ozurumba, A.B.C. Akujuobi, Chijindu Promise Ubah},
      title = {The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices on Organizational Performance: A Study of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1699-1711},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709627.pdf},
      abstract = {This study aimed to explore the effect of sustainable procurement practices on the organizational performance of selected manufacturing companies in Nigeria. The research arose from the need to understand how sustainability initiatives in procurement could impact key performance metrics such as financial outcomes, operational efficiency, market competitiveness, customer satisfaction, waste reduction, and corporate reputation. The study covered manufacturing firms such as Nestl?, Dangote Cement, Nigerian Breweries, and others, providing a comprehensive view of the manufacturing sector's approach to sustainability. Findings reveal that sustainable procurement practices have a significant positive impact on the financial performance of manufacturing companies. Cost reductions, increased revenue, and improved profitability were attributed to better supplier negotiations, enhanced marketability, and long-term cost savings. Operational efficiency was also positively affected, with streamlined processes and improved supply chain coordination due to sustainable sourcing. Companies noted that time management and supplier consistency have improved, leading to reduced delays and fewer disruptions. Additionally, sustainable procurement has helped companies achieve market differentiation, attracting new clients and enhancing long-term competitiveness. Regarding customer satisfaction and loyalty, sustainable procurement was found to foster trust and long-term relationships with customers. Positive feedback regarding sustainability initiatives has led to greater customer retention and loyalty. Furthermore, waste reduction and resource management have seen notable improvements, as companies now manage raw materials more efficiently and minimize waste through eco-friendly sourcing. This has also contributed to a reduction in their environmental footprint and enhanced corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts. In terms of corporate reputation, the adoption of sustainable procurement has positioned companies as responsible corporate citizens, enhancing their brand image. The study concluded that these practices are essential not only for improving financial and operational performance but also for gaining a competitive edge in the market and ensuring customer loyalty. Sustainable procurement is, therefore, a key driver for long-term success and market relevance. The study recommends that manufacturing companies continue to integrate these practices into their operations, and that policy makers? support such efforts through regulatory frameworks and incentives.},
      keywords = {Competitiveness, Organizational Performance, Procurement, Sustainability, Sustainable Procurement},
      month = {July},
  }