Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709723
Children?s Rights in Medical Decision-Making: Legal Analysis of Consent and Capacity in Pediatric Care
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Children?s Rights
Abstract
Children?s rights in medical decision-making present a complex intersection of legal, ethical, and clinical considerations, particularly regarding issues of consent and capacity in pediatric care. This paper critically analyzes the legal frameworks that govern consent and decision-making authority in the treatment of minors, focusing on the evolving recognition of children?s participatory rights within healthcare systems. Traditionally, parental authority has been the primary basis for healthcare decisions concerning children; however, contemporary legal developments increasingly emphasize the importance of children?s autonomy, maturity, and evolving capacity. This explores key legal principles underpinning pediatric consent, including the distinction between consent and assent, and the use of capacity assessments to determine a minor?s ability to participate in medical decisions. Special attention is given to the "Gillick competence" standard in the United Kingdom and its influence on capacity determinations in other jurisdictions. Additionally, the analysis examines various legal approaches to age-based consent thresholds and explores how courts reconcile parental rights with children's emerging autonomy, particularly in cases involving reproductive healthcare, mental health services, and life-sustaining treatment decisions. Ethical considerations, such as the "best interests of the child" standard, are also addressed, highlighting the tensions between safeguarding children?s welfare and respecting their developing autonomy. The paper further reviews landmark cases that have shaped the legal landscape of pediatric medical decision-making and underscores the challenges presented by emergencies and high-stakes treatment scenarios. This calls for harmonized legal frameworks that recognize children's evolving decision-making capacity while ensuring adequate protections. It advocates for greater integration of child-centered approaches in healthcare policy, enhanced clinical practices that promote informed participation, and legal reforms that strengthen children's rights in medical contexts. Such measures are essential for advancing ethical, equitable, and effective pediatric healthcare.
Keywords
Children?s Rights, Medical Decision-Making, Legal Analysis, Consent, Capacity, Pediatric Care
References
[1] Ajani, G., Boella, G., Di Caro, L., Robaldo, L., Humphreys, L., Praduroux, S., Rossi, P. and Violato, A., 2017. The European legal taxonomy syllabus: a multi-lingual, multi-level ontology framework to untangle the web of European legal terminology. Applied Ontology, 11(4), pp.325-375.
[2] Arras, J.D., 2017. Principles and particularity: the roles of cases in bioethics. In Ethics and Medical Decision-Making (pp. 99-130). Routledge.
[3] Banta, N.M., 2018. Minors and digital asset succession. Iowa L. Rev., 104, p.1699.
[4] Bennouna, C., Mansourian, H. and Stark, L., 2017. Ethical considerations for children’s participation in data collection activities during humanitarian emergencies: A Delphi review. Conflict and health, 11, pp.1-15.
[5] Birchley, G., 2016. Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making. Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(2), pp.111-115.
[6] Bombak, A.E., McPhail, D. and Ward, P., 2016. Reproducing stigma: Interpreting “overweight” and “obese” women's experiences of weight-based discrimination in reproductive healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 166, pp.94-101.
[7] Bourgeois, F.C., DesRoches, C.M. and Bell, S.K., 2018. Ethical challenges raised by OpenNotes for pediatric and adolescent patients. Pediatrics, 141(6).
[8] Bozzaro, C., Boldt, J. and Schweda, M., 2018. Are older people a vulnerable group? Philosophical and bioethical perspectives on ageing and vulnerability. Bioethics, 32(4), pp.233-239.
[9] Brawner, B.M. and Sutton, M.Y., 2018. Sexual health research among youth representing minority populations: To waive or not to waive parental consent. Ethics & Behavior, 28(7), pp.544-559.
[10] Brennan, C., Traustadóttir, R., Rice, J. and Anderberg, P., 2016. Negotiating independence, choice and autonomy: experiences of parents who coordinate personal assistance on behalf of their adult son or daughter. Disability & society, 31(5), pp.604-621.
[11] Burns, K., Pösö, T. and Skivenes, M., 2017. Removals of children by the child welfare system–variations and differences across countries. Burns, Kenneth/Pösö, Tarja/Skivenes, Marit (Hg.). Child welfare removals by the state: a cross-country analysis of decision-making systems. New York: Oxford University Press. S, pp.223-243.
[12] Chandler, K., White, B. and Willmott, L., 2017. What role for adult guardianship in authorising restrictive practices?. Monash University Law Review, 43(2), pp.492-529.
[13] Coughlin, K.W., 2018. Medical decision-making in paediatrics: Infancy to adolescence. Paediatrics & Child Health, 23(2), pp.138-146.
[14] Coyne, I., Hallström, I. and Söderbäck, M., 2016. Reframing the focus from a family-centred to a child-centred care approach for children’s healthcare. Journal of Child Health Care, 20(4), pp.494-502.
[15] Dailey, A.C. and Rosenbury, L.A., 2018. The new law of the child. The Yale Law Journal, pp.1448-1537.
[16] Dreisinger, N. and Zapolsky, N., 2018. Complexities of consent: Ethics in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 34(4), pp.288-290.
[17] D'Souza, R., Shah, P.S. and Sander, B., 2018. Clinical decision analysis in perinatology. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(4), pp.491-499.
[18] Fleischman, A.R., 2016. Pediatric ethics: protecting the interests of children. Oxford University Press.
[19] Foblets, M.C., Graziadei, M. and Renteln, A.D., 2018. Personal autonomy in plural societies: A principle and its paradoxes (p. 316). Taylor & Francis.
[20] Griffith, R., 2016. What is Gillick competence?. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 12(1), pp.244-247.
[21] Grossman, J.L., 2017. Constitutional parentage. Const. Comment., 32, p.307.
[22] Havenga, Y. and Temane, M.A., 2016. Consent by children: considerations when assessing maturity and mental capacity. South African Family Practice, 58(sup1), pp.S43-S46.
[23] Heggdalsvik, I.K., Rød, P.A. and Heggen, K., 2018. Decision‐making in child welfare services: Professional discretion versus standardized templates. Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), pp.522-529.
[24] Herring, J., 2016. Vulnerable adults and the law. Oxford University Press.
[25] Huxtable, R., 2018. Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?. Journal of medical ethics, 44(7), pp.471-475.
[26] Ikuta, E., 2016. Overcoming the parental veto: How transgender adolescents can access puberty-suppressing hormone treatment in the absence of parental consent under the mature minor doctrine. S. Cal. Interdisc. LJ, 25, p.179.
[27] Jeremic, V., Sénécal, K., Borry, P., Chokoshvili, D. and Vears, D.F., 2016. Participation of children in medical decision-making: Challenges and potential solutions. Journal of bioethical inquiry, 13, pp.525-534.
[28] Katz, A.L., Webb, S.A., Committee on Bioethics, Macauley, R.C., Mercurio, M.R., Moon, M.R., Okun, A.L., Opel, D.J. and Statter, M.B., 2016. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), p.e20161485.
[29] Kim, B. and White, K., 2018. How can health professionals enhance interpersonal communication with adolescents and young adults to improve health care outcomes?: systematic literature review. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 23(2), pp.198-218.
[30] Kodra, Y., Weinbach, J., Posada-De-La-Paz, M., Coi, A., Lemonnier, S.L., Van Enckevort, D., Roos, M., Jacobsen, A., Cornet, R., Ahmed, S.F. and Bros-Facer, V., 2018. Recommendations for improving the quality of rare disease registries. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(8), p.1644.
[31] Labit, A., 2017. Self-managed co-housing in the context of an ageing population in Europe. In The re-emergence of co-housing in Europe (pp. 42-55). Routledge.
[32] Lang, A. and Paquette, E.T., 2018, October. Involving minors in medical decision making: understanding ethical issues in assent and refusal of care by minors. In Seminars in Neurology (Vol. 38, No. 05, pp. 533-538). Thieme Medical Publishers.
[33] Lee, S.J., 2017. A Child's Voice vs. a Parent's Control: Resolving a Tension Between the Convention on the Rights of the Child and US Law. Colum. L. Rev., 117, p.687.
[34] Lerwick, J.L., 2016. Minimizing pediatric healthcare-induced anxiety and trauma. World journal of clinical pediatrics, 5(2), p.143.
[35] Luyckx, V.A., Miljeteig, I., Ejigu, A.M. and Moosa, M.R., 2017, May. Ethical challenges in the provision of dialysis in resource-constrained environments. In Seminars in nephrology (Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 273-286). WB Saunders.
[36] MacIntosh, C., 2016. Carter, medical aid in dying, and mature minors. McGill JL & Health S1, 10.
[37] Martakis, K., Brand, H. and Schröder-Bäck, P., 2018. Developing child autonomy in pediatric healthcare: towards an ethical model. Archivos argentinos de pediatria, 116(3), pp.e401-e408.
[38] Maryman, J.V., Strompolis, M., Maton, K.I. and Perkins, D.D., 2016. The SCRA Public Policy Committee in action: Advocacy, collaboration, and capacity building. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 7(1).
[39] McElvaney, R. and Tatlow-Golden, M., 2016. A traumatised and traumatising system: Professionals' experiences in meeting the mental health needs of young people in the care and youth justice systems in Ireland. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, pp.62-69.
[40] McEwen, R., Eldridge, J. and Caruso, D., 2018. Differential or deferential to media? The effect of prejudicial publicity on judge or jury. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 22(2), pp.124-143.
[41] Moore, A. and Reynolds, P., 2017. Childhood and sexuality: Contemporary issues and debates. Springer.
[42] Mustapha, A.Y., Chianumba, E.C., Forkuo, A.Y., Osamika, D. and Komi, L.S., 2018. Systematic review of mobile health (mHealth) applications for infectious disease surveillance in developing countries. Methodology, 66.
[43] Nawaila, M.B., Kanbul, S. and Ozdamli, F., 2018. A review on the rights of children in the digital age. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, pp.390-409.
[44] NeJaime, D., 2017. The nature of parenthood. The Yale Law Journal, pp.2260-2381.
[45] Nonet, P., Selznick, P. and Kagan, R.A., 2017. Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. Routledge.
[46] Ogungbenle, H.N. and Omowole, B.M., 2012. Chemical, functional and amino acid composition of periwinkle (Tympanotonus fuscatus var radula) meat. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res, 13(2), pp.128-132.
[47] Okato, A., Hashimoto, T., Tanaka, M., Tachibana, M., Machizawa, A., Okayama, J., Endo, M., Senda, M., Saito, N. and Iyo, M., 2018. Hospital-based child protection teams that care for parents who abuse or neglect their children recognize the need for multidisciplinary collaborative practice involving perinatal care and mental health professionals: a questionnaire survey conducted in Japan. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, pp.121-130.
[48] Olarinde, E.S. and Bamidele, I., 2016. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA: The Right of Adolescents to Make Medical Decisions and the Many Shades of Grey. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 54, p.13.
[49] Onasoga, O.A., 2017. Challenges and barriers to adolescents' post-abortion care services: Implications for reproductive health policy in Nigeria.
[50] Ottemiller, D.D. and Awais, Y.J., 2016. A model for art therapists in community-based practice. Art Therapy, 33(3), pp.144-150.
[51] Palmer, B.W. and Harmell, A.L., 2016. Assessment of healthcare decision-making capacity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(6), pp.530-540.
[52] Paul, M., O’hara, L., Tah, P., Street, C., Maras, A., Ouakil, D.P., Santosh, P., Signorini, G., Singh, S.P., Tuomainen, H. and McNicholas, F., 2018. A systematic review of the literature on ethical aspects of transitional care between child-and adult-orientated health services. BMC Medical Ethics, 19, pp.1-11.
[53] Polonko, K.A., Lombardo, L.X. and Bolling, I.M., 2016. Law Reform, Child Maltreatment and the un Convention on the Rights of the Child. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 24(1), pp.29-64.
[54] Ponnert, L. and Johansson, S., 2018. Juridification and standardisation: two legal dimensions influencing contemporary child protection. The British journal of social work, 48(7), pp.2020-2037.
[55] Pott, R., 2017. Delivering social work services in collaboration with the legal representation for individual clients: An effective, ethical and economical approach to supporting families in child abuse and neglect legal proceedings. Child abuse & neglect, 73, pp.24-29.
[56] Renzaho, A.M., Kamara, J.K., Georgeou, N. and Kamanga, G., 2017. Sexual, reproductive health needs, and rights of young people in slum areas of Kampala, Uganda: a cross sectional study. PloS one, 12(1), p.e0169721.
[57] Rieger, K.L., Chernomas, W.M., McMillan, D.E., Morin, F.L. and Demczuk, L., 2016. Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 14(11), pp.139-239.
[58] Rumbold, B., Baker, R., Ferraz, O., Hawkes, S., Krubiner, C., Littlejohns, P., Norheim, O.F., Pegram, T., Rid, A., Venkatapuram, S. and Voorhoeve, A., 2017. Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health. The Lancet, 390(10095), pp.712-714.
[59] Ryznar, M., 2018. A Curious Parental Right. SMU L. Rev., 71, p.127.
[60] Salloum, A., Johnco, C., Lewin, A.B., McBride, N.M. and Storch, E.A., 2016. Barriers to access and participation in community mental health treatment for anxious children. Journal of affective disorders, 196, pp.54-61.
[61] Salter, E.K., 2017. Conflating Capacity & Authority: why We're asking the wrong question in the adolescent decision‐making debate. Hastings Center Report, 47(1), pp.32-41.
[62] Sandberg, K., 2018. Children’s right to protection under the CRC. Human rights in child protection: Implications for professional practice and policy, pp.15-38.
[63] Sangiovanni, A., 2017. Humanity without dignity: Moral equality, respect, and human rights. Harvard University Press.
[64] Schwartz, M.S., 2016. Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, pp.755-776.
[65] Stockings, E., Hall, W.D., Lynskey, M., Morley, K.I., Reavley, N., Strang, J., Patton, G. and Degenhardt, L., 2016. Prevention, early intervention, harm reduction, and treatment of substance use in young people. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(3), pp.280-296.
[66] Sudore, R.L., Lum, H.D., You, J.J., Hanson, L.C., Meier, D.E., Pantilat, S.Z., Matlock, D.D., Rietjens, J.A., Korfage, I.J., Ritchie, C.S. and Kutner, J.S., 2017. Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. Journal of pain and symptom management, 53(5), pp.821-832.
[67] Taylor, M., 2018. Too Close to the Knives: Children's Rights, Parental Authority, and Best Interests in the Context of Elective Pediatric Surgeries. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 28(3), pp.281-308.’
[68] Vaska, A.I., Benson, J., Eliott, J.A. and Williams, J., 2016. Age determination in refugee children: A narrative history tool for use in holistic age assessment. Journal of paediatrics and child health, 52(5), pp.523-528.
[69] Wangmo, T., De Clercq, E., Ruhe, K.M., Beck-Popovic, M., Rischewski, J., Angst, R., Ansari, M. and Elger, B.S., 2017. Better to know than to imagine: including children in their health care. AJOB empirical bioethics, 8(1), pp.11-20.
[70] Werner‐Lin, A., Merrill, S.L. and Brandt, A.C., 2018. Talking with children about adult‐onset hereditary cancer risk: a developmental approach for parents. Journal of genetic counseling, 27(3), pp.533-548.
[71] Whelan, A.M., 2016. Lowering the age of consent: pushing back against the anti-vaccine movement. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 44(3), pp.462-473.
[72] Wiesemann, C., 2016. Moral equality, bioethics, and the child (Vol. 67). Cham: Springer.
[73] Will, J.F., 2016. Religion As a Controlling Interference in Medical Decision-Making by Minors. Forthcoming as, pp.2017-03.
[74] Willmott, L., White, B. and Bhatia, N., 2018. When is it in a child's best interests to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment? An evolving Australian jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Medicine, 25(4), pp.944-972.
[75] Wright, M.S., 2017. End of life and autonomy: the case for relational nudges in end-of-life decision-making law and policy. Md. L. Rev., 77, p.1062.
[76] Zillén, K., Garland, J. and Slokenberga, S., 2017. The rights of children in biomedicine: Challenges posed by scientific advances and uncertainties.
How to cite this paper
@article{1709723,
author = {Augustine Onyeka Okoli, Irene Sagay, Sandra Oparah, Opeoluwa Oluwanifemi Ajayi, Collins Nwannebuike Nwokedi},
title = {Children?s Rights in Medical Decision-Making: Legal Analysis of Consent and Capacity in Pediatric Care},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2019},
volume = {2},
number = {11},
pages = {462-480},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709723.pdf},
abstract = {Children?s rights in medical decision-making present a complex intersection of legal, ethical, and clinical considerations, particularly regarding issues of consent and capacity in pediatric care. This paper critically analyzes the legal frameworks that govern consent and decision-making authority in the treatment of minors, focusing on the evolving recognition of children?s participatory rights within healthcare systems. Traditionally, parental authority has been the primary basis for healthcare decisions concerning children; however, contemporary legal developments increasingly emphasize the importance of children?s autonomy, maturity, and evolving capacity. This explores key legal principles underpinning pediatric consent, including the distinction between consent and assent, and the use of capacity assessments to determine a minor?s ability to participate in medical decisions. Special attention is given to the "Gillick competence" standard in the United Kingdom and its influence on capacity determinations in other jurisdictions. Additionally, the analysis examines various legal approaches to age-based consent thresholds and explores how courts reconcile parental rights with children's emerging autonomy, particularly in cases involving reproductive healthcare, mental health services, and life-sustaining treatment decisions. Ethical considerations, such as the "best interests of the child" standard, are also addressed, highlighting the tensions between safeguarding children?s welfare and respecting their developing autonomy. The paper further reviews landmark cases that have shaped the legal landscape of pediatric medical decision-making and underscores the challenges presented by emergencies and high-stakes treatment scenarios. This calls for harmonized legal frameworks that recognize children's evolving decision-making capacity while ensuring adequate protections. It advocates for greater integration of child-centered approaches in healthcare policy, enhanced clinical practices that promote informed participation, and legal reforms that strengthen children's rights in medical contexts. Such measures are essential for advancing ethical, equitable, and effective pediatric healthcare.},
keywords = {Children?s Rights, Medical Decision-Making, Legal Analysis, Consent, Capacity, Pediatric Care},
month = {May},
}