Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709771
Corporate Project Management Office Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation of Quality Enhancement Mechanisms
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Project Management
Abstract
This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of Corporate Project Management Offices (CPMOs) in enhancing quality outcomes within large-scale projects. Using data collected from 63 executives and project managers at the Jeddah Central Development Company (JCDC), the research validates a five-dimensional CPMO model and its impact on three key quality indicators: waste reduction, non-conformance report reduction, and rework reduction. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) confirms all hypothesized relationships, with values ranging from 0.322 to 0.574. The findings provide actionable insights for organizations seeking to optimize PMO functions and contribute to the global body of project-management knowledge, particularly within the context of Saudi Arabia?s Vision 2030.
Keywords
Project Management Office, Corporate PMO, Quality Management, Saudi Arabia, PLS-SEM, Project Quality
References
[1] Aubry, M. (2015). Project Management Office Transformations: Direct and Moderating Effects That Enhance Performance and Maturity. Project Management Journal, 46
[2] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
[3] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Crawford, L. (2002). Developing a project management office: A guidebook. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
[5] Crawford, L., Hobbs, G., & Turner, R. (2017). Project Management Office (PMO) success factors: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1509-1522.
[6] Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(2), 2-24.
[7] Juran, J. M. (1988). Quality control handbook (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[8] Juran, J. M., & De Feo, J. A. (2010). Juran's quality handbook: The complete guide to performance excellence (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[9] Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[10] Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.).
[11] Hubbard, D. G., & Bolles, D. L. (2015). PMO framework and PMO models for project business management (2nd ed.). PM World Journal, IV.
[12] Kadenic, M. D., & Tambo, T. (2021). Re-institutionalization of project management offices by large-scale agile frameworks. Journal of Modern Project Management, 9.
[13] Barbalho, S. C. M., & Silva, G. L. D. (2022). A typification of PMO functions: Dependency and categorization. International Journal of Project Organization and Management, 14.
[14] Monteiro, A., Varajão, J., & Santos, V. (2024). Project management office typologies, types, and functions: A systematic analysis of the literature and directions for research. Project Management Journal. Advance online publication.
[15] Turner, R. J., & Pinnington, A. H. (2022). Integrating governance functions within PMOs: A strategic approach. Project Management Journal, 53.
[16] Sandhu, M. A., Al Ameri, T., Shahzad, A., & Naseem, A. (2024). The role of project management office in the implementation of strategic plans in project-based organizations.
[17] Müller, R., & Klein, G. (2023). Governance practices and their impact on benefits realization and performance metrics. International Journal of Project Management, 41.
[18] Project Management Institute & PwC. (2021). Lessons from the Global Top Tier: PMI and PwC PMO Maturity Report.
[19] Soliman, Y. (2015). Project management office and its impact on U.A.E. public sectors: A literature review. SAR Journal: Science and Research, 1.
[20] Singh, R., Keil, M., & Kasi, V. (2016). Identifying and overcoming the challenges of implementing a project management office. PMO Advisory LLC.
[21] Almansoori, M. T. S., Rahman, I. A., & Memon, A. H. (2021). Correlation between the management factors affecting PMO implementation in UAE construction. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12.
[22] Saudi Vision 2030. (2016). Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Vision 2030. Retrieved from https://vision2030.gov.sa/
How to cite this paper
@article{1709771,
author = {Mohamed Anan, Rabab Sobhi},
title = {Corporate Project Management Office Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation of Quality Enhancement Mechanisms},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {1026-1033},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709771.pdf},
abstract = {This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of Corporate Project Management Offices (CPMOs) in enhancing quality outcomes within large-scale projects. Using data collected from 63 executives and project managers at the Jeddah Central Development Company (JCDC), the research validates a five-dimensional CPMO model and its impact on three key quality indicators: waste reduction, non-conformance report reduction, and rework reduction. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) confirms all hypothesized relationships, with values ranging from 0.322 to 0.574. The findings provide actionable insights for organizations seeking to optimize PMO functions and contribute to the global body of project-management knowledge, particularly within the context of Saudi Arabia?s Vision 2030.},
keywords = {Project Management Office, Corporate PMO, Quality Management, Saudi Arabia, PLS-SEM, Project Quality},
month = {July},
}