Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709838
Assessing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Integration in Nigeria?s Extractive Industries Through Policy Review and Analysis
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Science
Abstract
This study examines the integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles in Nigeria?s extractive industries through a review of national policies and institutional frameworks. Key instruments such as the Petroleum Industry Act (2021) and the Mining Act (2007) are assessed against global standards including GRI, SASB, UNGPs, and EITI. Findings reveal that while Nigeria has made progress in ESG policy development, implementation remains fragmented, largely procedural, and weakened by poor inter-agency coordination and limited monitoring capacity. Significant ESG risks and uneven compliance persist across different operator types. The study recommends the development of a unified ESG framework, a centralized monitoring portal, mandatory performance audits, and expanded institutional capacity to support more effective and inclusive extractive governance.
Keywords
ESG, Extractive Industries, Nigeria, Sustainability, Policy Review, NEITI, PIA, Governance, Mining, Oil and Gas.
References
[1] Adewuyi, A. O., & Ola-David, O. (2020). Corruption and environmental degradation in Nigeria’s extractive sector. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 22(1), 111–127.
[2] Aghalino, S. O. (2020). Environmental concerns in Nigeria’s oil industry: ESG realities and illusions. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 38(4), 553–570.
[3] Akanni, L. (2021). Regulatory fragmentation in Nigeria’s extractive sector: Policy contradictions and ESG gaps. Nigerian Journal of Development Policy Studies, 15(2), 74–89.
[4] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
[5] Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
[6] DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
[7] NUPRC. (2024). Annual gas flare report. Nigeria Petroleum Upstream Regulatory Commission Abuja, Nigeria.
[8] Ebeku, K. S. A. (2019). Regulatory enforcement and sustainable development in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Law, 9(1), 45–67.
[9] Echendu, A. J. (2022). Environmental and social impact assessments in Nigeria: From compliance to sustainability. Environmental Management Review, 34(2), 89–103.
[10] EITI. (2022). EITI 2022 Progress Report. https://eiti.org [Crossref]
[11] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
[12] Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2022). GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards. https://www.globalreporting.org [Crossref]
[13] IFC. (2021). ESG guidance note for private sector companies. International Finance Corporation. https://www.ifc.org [Crossref]
[14] Iledare, O. (2022). Governance and ESG in Nigeria’s oil and gas policy frameworks. African Journal of Energy Economics, 14(1), 13–25.
[15] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
[16] Mol, A. P. J., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2000). Ecological modernization around the world: An introduction. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 3–14.
[17] MMSD. (2020). Environmental guidelines for the mining sector. Federal Ministry of Mines and Steel Development. Abuja, Nigeria.
[18] NEITI. (2023). 2022 NEITI Oil and Gas Industry Report. Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. https://www.neiti.gov.ng [Crossref]
[19] Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act. (2007). Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette.
[20] NUPRC. (2022). Guidelines for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting by Upstream Operators. Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission. Abuja, Nigeria.
[21] Nwapi, C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and ESG compliance in Nigeria’s extractive industry. African Human Rights Law Journal, 20(2), 528–545.
[22] Okonta, I., & Orji, U. J. (2021). Policy incoherence in Nigeria’s extractive governance: ESG implications. Review of African Political Economy, 48(168), 307–323.
[23] Onuoha, F. C. (2021). The politics of ESG compliance in Nigeria’s natural resource sector. Journal of African Policy Studies, 12(3), 230–248.
[24] Oviasuyi, P. O., & Uwadiae, J. (2010). The dilemma of Niger-Delta region as oil producing states of Nigeria. Journal of Peace, Conflict and Development, 16, 110–126.
[25] Petroleum Industry Act. (2021). Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette.
[26] SASB. (2020). Sustainability Accounting Standards Board: Extractives sector standards. https://www.sasb.org [Crossref]
[27] UNGP. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. United Nations Human Rights Council, Geneva.
[28] World Economic Forum. (2020). Measuring stakeholder capitalism: Towards common ESG metrics and consistent reporting of sustainable value creation. https://www.weforum.org [Crossref]
How to cite this paper
@article{1709838,
author = {Emmanuel Afeonkhai},
title = {Assessing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Integration in Nigeria?s Extractive Industries Through Policy Review and Analysis},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {1197-1206},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709838.pdf},
abstract = {This study examines the integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles in Nigeria?s extractive industries through a review of national policies and institutional frameworks. Key instruments such as the Petroleum Industry Act (2021) and the Mining Act (2007) are assessed against global standards including GRI, SASB, UNGPs, and EITI. Findings reveal that while Nigeria has made progress in ESG policy development, implementation remains fragmented, largely procedural, and weakened by poor inter-agency coordination and limited monitoring capacity. Significant ESG risks and uneven compliance persist across different operator types. The study recommends the development of a unified ESG framework, a centralized monitoring portal, mandatory performance audits, and expanded institutional capacity to support more effective and inclusive extractive governance.},
keywords = {ESG, Extractive Industries, Nigeria, Sustainability, Policy Review, NEITI, PIA, Governance, Mining, Oil and Gas.},
month = {July},
}