Dynamic Buckling of Steel Scaffolds Under Periodic Wind Load In Offshore Platforms

References

[1] A. C. Garrido, J. P. Martins, and A. R. Ribeiro, “Safety assessment of modular scaffolding systems in offshore structures,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 144, pp. 45– 56, Dec. 2018.

[2] L. Q. Hao, H. Zhang, and T. Zhang, “Application and development of scaffold systems in offshore oil platforms,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 180, pp. 312–322, Jan. 2019.

[3] M. A. Ghosn and P. R. Sause, “Reliability analysis of offshore structures under dynamic loading,” Marine Structures, vol. 62, pp. 132– 145, Jul. 2018.

[4] S. K. Sharma, R. K. Srivastava, and V. Kumar, “Dynamic response and stability analysis of scaffolding systems under harmonic loading,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1–15, Apr. 2020

[5] M. H. Patel, Dynamics of Offshore Structures. London, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.

[6] K. H. Lee and J. Y. Kim, “Resonance behavior of modular scaffold systems under wind- induced oscillations in offshore environments,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 199, pp. 106975, Feb. 2020.

[7] D. P. Taylor, “Structural performance of modular scaffolding under dynamic loads,” Engineering Structures, vol. 183, pp. 556–567, Feb. 2019.

[8] H. J. Lee, M. S. Alam, and R. M. Robinson, “Stability concerns in temporary scaffolding systems: A review of failure mechanisms,” Safety Science, vol. 122, pp. 104–113, Oct. 2020.

[9] A. K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 5th ed., Pearson, 2017.

[10] Y. H. Chien, T. H. Nguyen, and C. C. Chang, “Limitations of conventional scaffold design under dynamic loads: A comparative study,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 175, pp. 106360, Mar. 2021

[11] British Standards Institution, BS EN 12811-1: Temporary Works Equipment – Part 1: Scaffolds – Performance Requirements and General Design, BSI, London, U.K., 2003.

[12] U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Scaffold Safety Standard – 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart L, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, 2019

[13] B. Budiansky and R. S. Roth, “Axisymmetric dynamic buckling of clamped shallow spherical shells,” NASA Technical Note D-1510, 1963.

[14] G. J. Simitses and D. H. Hodges, Fundamentals of Structural Stability, Elsevier, 2006.

[15] C. Y. Wang, T. Q. Bui, and M. R. Wang, “Dynamic buckling analysis of scaffold structures using nonlinear finite elements,” Engineering Structures, vol. 184, pp. 102–114, Jan. 2019.

[16] J. H. Park and S. K. Kim, “Behavior of modular scaffolding systems under dynamic loading,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2150032, Apr. 2021

[17] S. Ahmad and B. F. Spencer, "Modeling of scaffold structures using lumped parameter systems for dynamic analysis," Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 120, pp. 133–141, 2016.

[18] T. K. Datta, Seismic Analysis of Structures, Wiley, 2010.

[19] M. Paz and W. Leigh, Structural Dynamics: Theory and Computation, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2004

@article{1710050,
      author = {Raphael Okosiemiema, Friday Sorka Bright},
      title = {Dynamic Buckling of Steel Scaffolds Under Periodic Wind Load In Offshore Platforms},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {227-233},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710050.pdf},
      abstract = {Steel scaffolds are critical temporary structures used for maintenance and construction on offshore oil and gas platforms. These scaffolds are frequently exposed to fluctuating wind loads, yet their susceptibility to dynamic buckling under periodic harmonic excitation remains poorly characterized in existing design frameworks. This study presents a comprehensive numerical simulation of the dynamic buckling behavior of steel scaffolds subjected to sinusoidal offshore wind loads using a MATLAB-based time-domain solver. The scaffold is idealized as a damped single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system, incorporating mass, stiffness, and viscous damping representative of offshore deployment conditions. The analysis revealed that, the peak lateral displacement reached about 15.0 mm, exceeding the scaffold?s safe deformation threshold of 5-10 mm, thus indicating a clear buckling risk. The accumulated strain energy peaked about 30.0 J. Damping dissipated about 18.0 J of energy, underscoring its crucial role in moderating the system?s vibration amplitude. Additionally, the amplitude-to-load ratio (ALR) rose to 0.042 mm/N. The load-displacement trajectory revealed pronounced softening behavior, consistent with nonlinear geometric effects during large deformations. These results demonstrated that dynamic buckling, particularly under harmonic wind loading near resonance, poses a substantial failure risk for offshore scaffolding. Static analysis alone is insufficient for safety assurance. The developed simulation framework provides a predictive tool for identifying dangerous excitation frequencies and guiding safer scaffold design and deployment. This work contributes actionable insights for improving offshore construction practices and informing regulatory safety standards.},
      keywords = {Steel Scaffold, Dynamic Buckling, Periodic Wind Load, Offshore Platform},
      month = {August},
  }