International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1710270

1710270 Vol 9 · Issue 2 Download Paper

Development of a Sustainable Production System by Integrating Green Manufacturing Principles

Ekerete Usak Osita Obiukwu Anthony C Okoronkwo Remy Uche

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Industrial and Production Engineering

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I2-1710270

Abstract

In this research, a comprehensive framework was developed to successfully incorporate green manufacturing principles into sustainable production systems in the Nigerian manufacturing industry. A mixed-methods approach was utilized, gathering quantitative data from 108 manufacturing companies and qualitative insights from six (6) senior managers. The study focused on four key green manufacturing principles: resource efficiency, waste minimization, energy optimization, and pollution prevention. Results showed that while there is a moderate level of awareness of these principles among Nigerian manufacturers, there are significant gaps in implementation, with only 5.6% of companies achieving full implementation. Among the four principles, resource efficiency had the highest adoption rates while energy optimization had the lowest implementation levels. Cost reduction was found to be the primary driver for implementation, followed by government regulations and management commitment. The main barriers to implementation were high investment costs, limited financial resources, and technical expertise gaps. Implementing green manufacturing practices led to notable environmental improvements, such as a 35% reduction in water consumption and a 60% decrease in landfill waste. The study also revealed significant social benefits, including improved worker health and safety. While economic benefits were also observed, they were more challenging to measure using existing systems. The study validated a theoretical framework that integrates concepts from various disciplines including Industrial Ecology, Cleaner Production, Circular Economy, and Life Cycle Thinking However; the study identified important contextual factors such as infrastructure limitations, regulatory inconsistencies and supply chain challenges that require adaptive implementation approaches. The results of future implementation analysis showed that 7.9% of companies will require such adaptive approaches.

Keywords

Sustainable: Production systems: Nigeria's manufacturing sector: Green manufacturing principles: Frameworks: Quantitative data: Qualitative insights: Mixed-methods Green manufacturing practices: Theoretical framework

References

[1] 14040, I. (2016). Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization.

[2] Abdul-Rashid, S. H. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Operations & Production Managem, 37(2), 182- 204.

[3] Adegboye, M. A. (2018). Green manufacturing and environmental performance of selected manufacturing companies in Nigeria. . Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 9(12), 97-104.

[4] Adesanya, O. S. (2020). Barriers to sustainable manufacturing practices in Nigerian manufacturing industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, , 251, 119665.

[5] Adetunji, I. P. (2018). Achieving sustainability in the construction supply chain. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability (pp. 161(3), 161-172.). Institution of Civil Engineers.

[6] Alves, C. &. (2015). Production management model integrating the principles of lean manufacturing and sustainability: A study in the furniture industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32(2), 153- 172.

[7] Bhanot, N. R. (2017). An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of https:// sustainable manufacturing. . Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4412-4439.

[8] Bocken, N. M. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. . Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320.

[9] Bunse, K. V. (2021). Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management -- gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. . Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(6-7), 66.

[10] Cherrafi, A. E. (2016). The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828-846.

[11] Chertow, M. R. (2020). Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 313-337.

[12] Daily, B. F. (2021). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. . International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1539-1552.

[13] De Toni, A. &. (2018). Manufacturing flexibility: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 36(6), 1587- 1617.

[14] Despeisse, M. B. (2023). Industrial ecology at factory level: A conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 30-39.

[15] Dornfeld, D. A. (2014). Moving towards green and sustainable manufacturing. . International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1(1), 63-66.

[16] Dubey, R. G. (2015). World-class sustainable manufacturing: Framework and a performance measurement system. International Journal of Production Research, 53(17), 5207-5223.

[17] Duflou, J. R. (2022). Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach. CIRP Annals, 61(2), 587-609.

[18] Ellen MacArthur Foundation. . (2023). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

[19] Epstein, M. J. (2021). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585-604.

[20] Figge, F. H. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard -- linking sustainability management to business strategy. . Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284.

[21] Fresner, J. (2018). Cleaner production as a means for effective environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 6(3-4), 171-179.

[22] Frosch, R. A. (2019). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), 144-152.

[23] Garetti, M. &. (2022). Sustainable manufacturing: Trends and research challenges. Production Planning & Control, 23(2-3), 83- 104.

[24] Geissdoerfer, M. S. (2017). The circular economy -- a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, , 143, 757-768.

[25] Geng, Y. S. (2017). Sustainability, well-being, and the circular economy in China and worldwide. Science, 355(6329), 1202-1204.

[26] Ghisellini, P. C. (2018). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. . Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32.

[27] Giannetti, B. F. (2018). Cleaner production practices in a medium size gold-plated jewelry company in Brazil: When little changes make the difference. . Journal of Cleaner Production, , 16(10), 1106-1117.

[28] Gibbs, D. &. (2017). Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco- industrial park development. Journal of Cleaner Production, , 15(17), 1683-1695.

[29] Govindan, K. K. (2015 ). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation https:// in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 555-568.

[30] Guan, Y. K. (2020). Modeling the implementation of green manufacturing for small and medium enterprises. . Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122200.

[31] Hauschild, M. Z. (2015). From life cycle assessment to sustainable production: Status and perspectives. CIRP Annals, 54(2), 1-21.

[32] Hutchins, M. J. (2018). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production,, 16(15), 1688-1698.

[33] Jacobsen, N. B. (2016). Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1-2), 239-255.

[34] Jawahir, I. S. (2016). Technological elements of circular economy and the principles of 6R-based closed-loop material flow in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, (pp. 40, 103- 108.). Procedia CIRP,.

[35] Jayal, A. D. (2010). Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. . CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology,, 2(3), 144-152.

[36] Lieder, M. &. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36-51.

[37] Mudgal, R. K. (2010). Greening the supply chain practices: An Indian perspective of enablers' relationships. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, , 1(2-3), 151-176.

[38] Nigeria, M. A. (2023). Annual manufacturing sector report 2023. . Nigeria: MAN Research & Information Services.

[39] Porter, M. E. (2015). Toward a new conception of the environment -competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives,, 9(4), 97-118.

[40] Rebitzer, G. E. (2014). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 30(5), 701-720.

[41] Sarkis, J. &. (2021). An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end- of-pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(1), 102-113.

[42] Sarkis, J. (2022). A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management:. An International Journal, 17(2), 202-216.

[43] Schrettle, S. H.-R. (2014). Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms' sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 73-84.

[44] Smith, L. &. (2022). Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 227-238.

[45] Statistics, N. B. (2023). Nigerian manufacturing sector statistics 2023. Nigeria: Federal Government of Nigera.

[46] United Nations Environmental Programme, U. (2016). Cleaner Productino: A training resource package, United Nations Environment Programme Industr and Environment. United Nations Environment Programme.

[47] Veleva, V. &. (2021). Indicators of sustainable production: Framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(6), 519-549.

[48] Walker, H. D. (2018). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1), 69-85.

[49] Yusup, M. Z. (2015). The implementation of cleaner production practices from Malaysian https:// manufacturers' perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 659-672.

[50] Zhang, F. R.-L. (2023). Toward a systemic navigation framework to integrate sustainable development into the company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 199-2.

How to cite this paper

Ekerete Usak , Osita Obiukwu, Anthony C Okoronkwo, Remy Uche "Development of a Sustainable Production System by Integrating Green Manufacturing Principles" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 2 2025 Page 784-806 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I2-1710270
Ekerete Usak , Osita Obiukwu, Anthony C Okoronkwo, Remy Uche "Development of a Sustainable Production System by Integrating Green Manufacturing Principles" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 2, Aug. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I2-1710270
Ekerete Usak , Osita Obiukwu, Anthony C Okoronkwo, Remy Uche (2025). Development of a Sustainable Production System by Integrating Green Manufacturing Principles. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I2-1710270
Ekerete Usak , Osita Obiukwu, Anthony C Okoronkwo, Remy Uche "Development of a Sustainable Production System by Integrating Green Manufacturing Principles" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 2, Aug. 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I2-1710270
@article{1710270,
      author = {Ekerete Usak , Osita Obiukwu, Anthony C Okoronkwo, Remy Uche },
      title = {Development of a Sustainable Production System by Integrating Green Manufacturing Principles},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {784-806},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710270.pdf},
      abstract = {In this research, a comprehensive framework was developed to successfully incorporate green manufacturing principles into sustainable production systems in the Nigerian manufacturing industry. A mixed-methods approach was utilized, gathering quantitative data from 108 manufacturing companies and qualitative insights from six (6) senior managers. The study focused on four key green manufacturing principles: resource efficiency, waste minimization, energy optimization, and pollution prevention. Results showed that while there is a moderate level of awareness of these principles among Nigerian manufacturers, there are significant gaps in implementation, with only 5.6% of companies achieving full implementation. Among the four principles, resource efficiency had the highest adoption rates while energy optimization had the lowest implementation levels. Cost reduction was found to be the primary driver for implementation, followed by government regulations and management commitment. The main barriers to implementation were high investment costs, limited financial resources, and technical expertise gaps. Implementing green manufacturing practices led to notable environmental improvements, such as a 35% reduction in water consumption and a 60% decrease in landfill waste. The study also revealed significant social benefits, including improved worker health and safety. While economic benefits were also observed, they were more challenging to measure using existing systems. The study validated a theoretical framework that integrates concepts from various disciplines including Industrial Ecology, Cleaner Production, Circular Economy, and Life Cycle Thinking However; the study identified important contextual factors such as infrastructure limitations, regulatory inconsistencies and supply chain challenges that require adaptive implementation approaches. The results of future implementation analysis showed that 7.9% of companies will require such adaptive approaches.},
      keywords = {Sustainable: Production systems: Nigeria's manufacturing sector: Green manufacturing principles: Frameworks:  Quantitative data: Qualitative insights: Mixed-methods Green manufacturing practices: Theoretical framework},
      month = {August},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I2-1710270}
  }