Liberal Ironism in Postmodern Philosophy: Richard Rorty?s Subversive Pragmatism

References

[1] Bacon, M. (2005). Liberalism and the problem of motivation: Rorty, Derrida, and the impossibility of justice. Res Publica, 11(3), 291–309.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-1585-9

[2] Bacon, M. (2017). Rorty’s post-foundational liberalism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 43(9), 875–895.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453716652923

[3] Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2001). The postmodern adventure: Science, technology, and cultural studies at the third millennium. Guilford Press.

[4] Bragues, G. (2006). Rorty’s romantic liberalism: Trading truth for justice. Humanitas, 19(12),4468.https://isi.org/journalarticle/rortys-romantic-liberalism-trading-truth-for-justice/

[5] Coombs, M. (2013). Rorty, solidarity, and the politics of recognition. Humanities, 2(2), 128–143.https://doi.org/10.3390/h2020128

[6] Djedidi, R. (2022). Rorty’s post-truth liberalism. Tabayyun, 42(2), 23–40.

[7] Forstenzer, J. (2018). The relevance of Rorty’s liberalism in the post-truth era. PhilArchive.https://philarchive.org/rec/FORTHR

[8] Hung, R. (2007). Richard Rorty and postmodern education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(2), 168–181.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00302.x

[9] Kautz, S. (1996). Liberalism and the postmodern self. Social Philosophy and Policy, 13(2),121.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001812

[10] Kwak, D. (2004). Rorty’s liberal Ironism and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(1),31–41.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00051.x

[11] Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

[12] Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press.

[13] Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.

[14] Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers volume 1. Cambridge University Press.

[15] Rorty, R. (1998). Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America. Harvard University Press.

[16] Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. Penguin.

[17] Ryu, Y. (2001). Rorty's pragmatism and postmodernism. Human Studies, 24(3–4), 245–264.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011979413221

[18] Shusterman, R. (1994). Pragmatism and liberalism between Dewey and Rorty. Political Theory, 22(3), 391–413.https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591794022003001

[19] Tukiainen, A. (2019). Rorty on liberalism and postphilosophy. Philosophy Today, 63(3), 701–722.https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2019613187

@article{1710421,
      author = {Nipul Kumar Nath},
      title = {Liberal Ironism in Postmodern Philosophy: Richard Rorty?s Subversive Pragmatism},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {9},
      pages = {507-513},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710421.pdf},
      abstract = {This paper explores Richard Rorty?s concept of liberal ironism as a central thread in postmodern philosophy and its implications for ethics, politics, and education. Rooted in a rejection of metaphysical foundations, Rorty?s subversive pragmatism promotes a democratic ethos grounded in contingency, solidarity, and imaginative redescription. The liberal ironist is one who doubts the universality of their own beliefs yet remains committed to liberal values such as freedom, justice, and the minimization of cruelty. Each section of the paper addresses a key dimension of this idea?from the death of metaphysics to the coexistence of public hope and private irony. Drawing on Rorty?s major works (Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity; Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature; Achieving Our Country), as well as contemporary scholarship, the analysis demonstrates how Rorty redefines selfhood, community, and civic responsibility in non-foundational terms. In the context of post-truth politics and populism, Rorty?s liberal ironism offers a timely response: not through rigid doctrines, but through empathy, narrative, and solidarity. The paper concludes that liberal ironism, while often misunderstood as relativism, is a morally serious and politically hopeful response to the pluralistic conditions of modern democratic life.},
      keywords = {Liberal Ironism, Richard Rorty, Postmodern Philosophy, Solidarity, Subversive Pragmatism},
      month = {March},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I9-1710421-469}
  }