Unmasking The False Prophets and False Prophecies of Management: Challenging Orthodoxy in A Complex World

References

[1] Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254–285. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161572](https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161572)

[2] Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (1996). Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 191–217). Sage.

[3] Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 432–464.

[4] Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2003). Studying management critically. SAGE Publications.

[5] Antony, J. (2004). Six Sigma in the UK service organisations: Results from a pilot survey. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(8), 1006–1013.

[6] Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363–399. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393449](https://doi.org/10.2307/2393449)

[7] Carreyrou, J. (2018). Bad blood: Secrets and lies in a Silicon Valley startup. Knopf.

[8] DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101](https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101)

[9] Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. SAGE Publications.

[10] Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for Critical Management Studies. Human Relations, 53(1), 7–32. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700531002](https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700531002)

[11] Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.

[12] Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.

[13] Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.

[14] Gelles, D. (2022). The man who broke capitalism: How Jack Welch gutted the heartland and crushed the soul of corporate America. Simon & Schuster.

[15] Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Publications.

[16] Grey, C. (2005). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organizations. SAGE Publications.

[17] Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. Harper Business.

[18] Holweg, M. (2007). The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25*(2), 420–437.

[19] Huczynski, A. (1993). Management gurus: What makes them and how to become one. Routledge.

[20] Jackson, N., & Carter, P. (2007). Rethinking organisational behaviour: A poststructuralist framework. Pearson Education.

[21] Kantor, J., & Streitfeld, D. (2015, August 15). Inside Amazon: Wrestling big ideas in a bruising workplace. The New York Times.

[22] Kieser, A. (1997). Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. Organization, 4(1), 49–74. [https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849741004](https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849741004)

[23] Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.

[24] Micklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, A. (1996). The witch doctors: Making sense of the management gurus. Times Books.

[25] Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. Berrett-Koehler.

[26] Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 371–394. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm014](https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm014)

[27] Parker, M. (2002). Against management: Organization in the age of managerialism. Polity Press.

[28] Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. Harper & Row.

[29] Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 78–95. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.7373679](https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.7373679)

[30] Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Harvard Business Press.

[31] Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

[32] Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571.

[33] Stacey, R. D. (2011). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

[34] Stout, L. A. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

[35] Tichy, N. M., & Sherman, S. (1993). Control your destiny or someone else will: Lessons in mastering change—the principles Jack Welch is using to revolutionize GE. Harper Business.

[36] Townley, B. (1993). Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30*(2), 221–238.

[37] Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (2009). The evolution of management thought (6th ed.). Wiley.

@article{1710703,
      author = {Wokoma, Harcourt Opubo},
      title = {Unmasking The False Prophets and False Prophecies of Management: Challenging Orthodoxy in A Complex World},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {1916-1924},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710703.pdf},
      abstract = {Management as a field of study and practice has long been shaped by competing theories, models, and prescriptions that claim universal applicability. Over time, many of these have solidified into orthodoxies?rigid schools of thought that elevate partial truths into grand solutions. Such doctrines, often celebrated as timeless principles, can be likened to ?false prophets? delivering ?false prophecies?: ideas that promise clarity yet obscure the realities of organizational life. This paper critically examines these false prophets of management by interrogating the limitations of dominant paradigms, including overly deterministic classical models, mechanistic quantitative frameworks, and managerial fads that prioritize rhetoric over substance. It argues that management cannot be reduced to dogma without sacrificing its capacity to address the complexity, uncertainty, and contextual variability that define modern organizations. Drawing on a cross-disciplinary critique, the paper highlights how uncritical acceptance of managerial orthodoxies produces false prophecies?simplistic predictions and prescriptions that fail in practice. By challenging these assumptions, the paper calls for a more reflective, context-sensitive approach to management, one that privileges adaptability, critical inquiry, and responsiveness over rigid adherence to outdated formulas. Ultimately, the paper contends that unmasking the false prophets of management is essential for advancing a discipline that remains relevant in a rapidly changing world.},
      keywords = {False Prophets, Management Orthodoxy, False Prophecies, Critical Management Studies, Organizational Complexity, Managerial Fads, Theory And Practice.},
      month = {September},
  }