Seismic Performance of Single Bay RCC Framed Building and Its Improvement Technique

References

[1] J. Bothara, J. Ingham, and D. Dizhur, “Earthquake Risk Reduction Efforts in Nepal,” Integr. Disaster Sci. Manag. Glob. Case Stud. Mitig. Recover., pp. 177–203, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812056-9.00011-7.

[2] G. G. Kakpure and D. A. R. Mundhada, “Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Seismic Analysis of Multistoried RCC Buildings by ETAB,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 07, no. 05, pp. 06–10, 2017, doi: 10.9790/9622-0705050610.

[3] R. C M, B. Narayan K S, S. B V, and V. Reddy D, “Effect of Irregular Configurations on Seismic Vulnerability of RC Buildings,” Archit. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 20–26, 2012, doi: 10.5923/j.arch.20120203.01.

[4] N. Mohammed and I. Nazrul, “Behaviour of Multistorey RCC Structure with Different Type of Bracing System (A Software Approach),” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. (An ISO, vol. 3297, no. 12, pp. 2319–8753, 2007, [Online]. Available: www.ijirset.com

[5] K. Sharma, L. Deng, and C. C. Noguez, “Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the April 25, 2015, Gorkha earthquake in Nepal,” Eng. Struct., vol. 121, pp. 61–74, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2016.04.043.

[6] P. Patel, S. Patel, T. Patel, and K. Damdoo, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT BRACING SYSTEMS IN RCC BUILDINGS USING STAAD . ProV8i,” pp. 1797–1801, 2019.

[7] J. Ahmed and H. S. Vidyadhar, “Wind Analysis and Design of Multi Bay Multi Storey 3D RC Frame,” vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 2567–2571, 2013.

[8] S. S. K, “Effect of Bracing on Seismic Performance of Multi-storeyed Building Frames with Floating Columns,” vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 22–26, 2021.

[9] S. Gupta, S. Gaikar, K. Patil, S. Shelar, and H. Thakare, “Dynamic Analysis of Multi Storey Building With and Without Shear Wall,” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 227–230, 2021, doi: 10.33564/ijeast.2021.v06i01.016.

[10] P. P. Chandurkar and P. S. Pajgade, “Seismic Analysis of RCC Building with and Without Shear Wall,” Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1805–1810, 2013, [Online]. Available: www.ijmer.com

@article{1710835,
      author = {Madhav Sharma, Surendra Bahadur Shahi},
      title = {Seismic Performance of Single Bay RCC Framed Building and Its Improvement Technique},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {1287-1306},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710835.pdf},
      abstract = {The major purpose of this study is to analyze the single-bay RCC Framed building and its improvement techniques. Total number of 36 models were selected. The models are 4 bay, 6 bay, 8 bay and 10 bay each with 3 storey, 5 storey and 7 storey. The model types are (i)Without bracing and shear wall, (ii) With Bracing and (iii) with shear wall. All the model was analyzed using Etabs software. Response spectrum analyses was carried out as per NBC code. The analysis was performed to understand the seismic performance of the single bay RCC building and compare its performance with that of the single bay RCC building with bracing and the RCC building with shear wall. The result shows that the size structural member increases significantly with the increase in number of bays and number of storeys, Bracing effectively reduces drift and displacement along the bracing direction while increasing stiffness and reducing overturning moments. Shear wall shows more effective than Bracing in reducing the drift and displacement.},
      keywords = {Single bay, Bracing, Shear wall, Response Spectrum, Etabs, NBC.},
      month = {September},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I3-1710835-2706}
  }