The Dynamic Relationship Between Law, Politics, And Society: A Doctrinal Analysis

References

[1] Ahmed, A. (2019). A theory of constitutional norms. Michigan Law Review, 117(6), 1291–1344.

[2] Chua, L. J. (2019). Legal consciousness reconsidered. Law & Society Review, 53(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12345

[3] Chynoweth, P. (2009). Legal research. Law Teacher, 43(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2009.9656066

[4] Cotterrell, R. (2017). What is sociological about sociological jurisprudence? International Journal of Law in Context, 13(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552317000265

[5] Dyzenhaus, D. (2006). The politics of the rule of law: Legality in a time of emergency. Cambridge University Press.

[6] Dyzenhaus, D. (2012). The politics of legality. The Modern Law Review, 75(1), 1–30.

[7] Gorobets, K. (2020). The international rule of law and the idea of normative authority. Law and Philosophy, 39(4), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-020-09388-3

[8] Graber, M. A. (2015). Law and politics. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 35(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu029

[9] Kumm, M. (2009). The cosmopolitan turn in constitutionalism: On the relationship between constitutionalism in and beyond the state. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381711000019

[10] Loughlin, M. (2010). What is constitutionalisation? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqn011

[11] MacCormick, N. (1994). Institutional normative order: A conception of law. Cornell Law Review, 79(4), 1198–1244.

[12] Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges: Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford University Press.

[13] Theil, S. (2025). Carefully tailored: Doctrinal methods and empirical contributions. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf029

[14] Tushnet, M. (2016). The relationship between political constitutionalism and weak-form judicial review. The Modern Law Review, 79(4), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12194

[15] Vranken, J. B. M. (2010). Methodology of legal doctrinal research. In M. A. A. Hoecke (Ed.), Methodologies of legal research: Which kind of method for what kind of discipline (pp. 111–121). Hart Publishing.

[16] Young, K. M. (2020). Legal consciousness and cultural capital. Law & Society Review, 54(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12545

@article{1710864,
      author = {Dr. Priyanka E., Dr. Srinivasan M. P.},
      title = {The Dynamic Relationship Between Law, Politics, And Society: A Doctrinal Analysis},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {1630-1635},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710864.pdf},
      abstract = {This paper examines the dynamic relationship between law, politics, and society through a doctrinal lens, emphasising their interdependent and evolving nature. The analysis situates law not as an isolated body of rules, but as a normative framework that both shapes and is shaped by political authority and social structures. Political processes influence the creation, interpretation, and application of law, while societal values and movements determine its legitimacy and acceptance. Conversely, law provides the institutional mechanisms through which political power is exercised and social order is maintained. By exploring this triadic nexus, the study highlights how doctrinal research enables a systematic understanding of legal principles within broader socio-political contexts. The findings underscore the necessity of viewing law as a living institution, responsive to political realities and social transformations, rather than as a static codification.},
      keywords = {Doctrinal Research, Law, Politics, Society, Interdependence},
      month = {September},
  }