Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711047
Toleration as the Central Plank of Modern Democratic State
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Philosophy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711047-7702
Abstract
This paper took a critical look at toleration as the central plank of modern democratic state. There are diversities in a democratic state that manifest differences in language, values, attitudes, lifestyles, religion, dress, custom, tradition, physical appearance, interests and speech. This shows the het- erogenous nature of the modern democratic state which can pose danger to civil peace without toleration. Not recognizing and respecting the rights and beliefs of other people who have divergent views are the major cause of intolerance. This work argues that toleration is an indispensable tool for democratic sustainability. In order to give the topic the adequate explanation that it deserves, we employed analysis. The paper is concluded with the suggestion that being tolerant remains the key to resolving political and religious tension and differences in a democratic state.
Keywords
Toleration, Central Plank, Modern, Democratic State.
References
[1] Apppadorai, A. (2004). The Substance of Politics. Oxford University Press.
[2] Barowski, J. and Shires, Q. (2023). Tolerance/Definition, Types, Importance & Examples. Available Online at: study. com (Accessed: 28 August, 2025).
[3] Eger, M. and Hjerm, M. (2019).What Is Tolerance And How Much of it do Democracies Require? Available Online at:
[4] https://www.opendemocracy.net>en>countering-radical. (Accessed: 28 August, 2025).
[5] Elom, P. O. (2006). “Religious Conflict in Nigeria: A Discourse” in Samuel I. Odo (ed.) Peace and Conflict Studies in Africa. Jones Communications Publishers, pp.59-68.
[6] Etim, F. (2005). "Religion, Tolerance and National Development” in Sophia: An African Journal of Philosophy. 8 (1). Department of Philosophy, University of Calabar, pp.53-55.
[7] Mill, J.S. (1991). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford University Press.
[8] Momoh, C.S. (2005). The Demise of Democracy, and Moralism as the “NneMmiri” of Corruption in Nigeria. A Text of a Public Lecture Delivered Under the Auspices of the Department of Philosophy and Religion, Faculty of Arts, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki.
[9] Murphy, A .R. (2025). “Tolerance / Sociology, Religion and Politics” in Britannica. Available Online at: https://www. britannica.com>topic>toleration (Accessed: 20 January, 2025).
[10] National Teachers Institute. (2005). Postgraduate Diploma in Education (PGDE by DLS). National Teachers Institute.
[11] Nweke, E. (2006). "Political Conflicts in Nigeria” in Samuel I. Odo (ed.) Peace and Conflict Studies in Africa. Jones Communications Publishers, p.54.
[12] Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
[13] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2005). Locke’s Political Philosophy. Available Online at: http://plato.stanford. edu/entries/locke-political/#TOL (Accessed: 11 January, 2016).
How to cite this paper
@article{1711047,
author = {Aka, Augustine Chukwuemeka, PhD, Dr. Eruka C. Raphael},
title = {Toleration as the Central Plank of Modern Democratic State},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {4},
pages = {72-76},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711047.pdf},
abstract = {This paper took a critical look at toleration as the central plank of modern democratic state. There are diversities in a democratic state that manifest differences in language, values, attitudes, lifestyles, religion, dress, custom, tradition, physical appearance, interests and speech. This shows the het- erogenous nature of the modern democratic state which can pose danger to civil peace without toleration. Not recognizing and respecting the rights and beliefs of other people who have divergent views are the major cause of intolerance. This work argues that toleration is an indispensable tool for democratic sustainability. In order to give the topic the adequate explanation that it deserves, we employed analysis. The paper is concluded with the suggestion that being tolerant remains the key to resolving political and religious tension and differences in a democratic state. },
keywords = {Toleration, Central Plank, Modern, Democratic State.},
month = {October},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711047-7702}
}