Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711145
Measuring the Impact of Targeted GIS Training on NGO Field Operations
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Geospatial Capacity Building
Abstract
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become indispensable tools for public health and humanitarian organizations, enabling effective planning, monitoring, and evaluation of field interventions. Despite the growing reliance on spatial data, many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) continue to struggle with data quality, operational efficiency, and integration of geospatial insights into decision-making. This study examines the impact of a structured GIS training program delivered to health field teams within the Hacey Health Initiative. Using a pre- and post-training design, the research measured changes in data accuracy, completeness, and collection efficiency during field operations. The intervention consisted of a targeted training curriculum incorporating ArcGIS Pro and Survey123, applied to routine health data collection processes. Data sources included field observation forms, device-generated logs, and quality control samples reviewed by supervisory staff. Accuracy audits were conducted on randomly selected data points, completeness was scored against standardized forms, and collection time metrics were captured from device logs. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all indicators, with accuracy scores increasing by 21.4%, completeness rising by 18.7%, and average data collection time per case reduced by 27.5% following the training. These findings underscore the value of structured GIS capacity-building for NGOs, particularly in resource-constrained health programs, where data-driven decision-making is critical for optimizing outcomes. The study concludes with recommendations for embedding GIS training into NGO operational frameworks, aligning field practices with emerging standards in digital health and geospatial analytics.
Keywords
Geographic Information Systems, NGO Operations, Health Data Quality, Arcgis Pro, Survey123, Field Efficiency, Capacity-Building, Hacey Health Initiative
References
[1] Cromley EK, McLafferty SL. GIS and Public Health. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
[2] Nykiforuk CIJ, Flaman LM. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for health promotion and public health: a review. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(1):63–73.
[3] Openshaw S, Abrahart RJ. GeoComputation. London: CRC Press; 2000.
[4] Ebener S, Guerra-Arias M, Campbell J, Tatem AJ, Moran AC, Amoako Johnson F, et al. The geography of maternal and newborn health: the state of the art. Int J Health Geogr. 2015;14(1):19.
[5] Mengistu T, Tamiru M, Taye G. Application of GIS in community health information systems in low-resource settings. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2017;31(2):98–106.
[6] Schuurman N, Bell N, Dunn JR, Oliver L. Deprivation indices, population health and geography: an evaluation of the spatial effectiveness of indices at multiple scales. J Urban Health. 2007;84(4):591–603.
[7] Hay SI, Snow RW, Rogers DJ. Predicting malaria seasons in Kenya using multitemporal meteorological satellite sensor data. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998;92(1):12–20.
[8] Ouma PO, Maina J, Thuranira PN, Macharia PM, Alegana VA, English M, et al. Access to emergency hospital care provided by the public sector in sub-Saharan Africa in 2015: a geocoded inventory and spatial analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(3):e342–50.
[9] Noor AM, Alegana VA, Gething PW, Tatem AJ, Snow RW. Using remotely sensed night-time light as a proxy for poverty in Africa. Popul Health Metr. 2008;6(1):5.
[10] Nutley T, Reynolds HW. Improving the use of health data for health system strengthening. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:20001.
[11] AbouZahr C, Boerma T. Health information systems: the foundations of public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(8):578–83.
[12] Gething PW, Noor AM, Zurovac D, Atkinson PM, Hay SI, Nixon MS, et al. Empirical modelling of government health service use by children with fevers in Kenya. Acta Trop. 2004;91(3):227–37.
[13] Mboera LEG, Rumisha SF, Mlacha T, Mayala BK, Bwana VM, Shayo EH, et al. Malaria surveillance and use of evidence in planning and decision-making in Tanzania: what is the way forward? Tanzan J Health Res. 2017;19(3). doi:10.4314/thrb.v19i3.4.
[14] Mugo DM, Odero W, Chelagat D, Muthee R, Kihara J. Effect of mHealth technologies on data quality in resource-limited settings: evidence from a maternal health program in Kenya. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04048.
[15] Tom-Aba D, Olaleye A, Olayinka A, Nguku P, Waziri N, Adewuyi P, et al. Innovative technological approach to Ebola virus disease outbreak response in Nigeria using the open data kit and form hub technology. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0131000.
[16] Barron P, Pillay Y, Doherty T, Sherman G, Jackson D, Bhardwaj S, et al. Eliminating mother-to-child HIV transmission in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(1):70–4.
[17] Zheng Y, Walsham G. Inequality of what? An intersectional approach to digital inequality under Covid-19. Inf Organ. 2021;31(1):100341.
[18] Zahra SA, George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev. 2002;27(2):185–203.
How to cite this paper
@article{1711145,
author = {Kayode A. Adeparusi},
title = {Measuring the Impact of Targeted GIS Training on NGO Field Operations},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2024},
volume = {7},
number = {10},
pages = {596-607},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711145.pdf},
abstract = {Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become indispensable tools for public health and humanitarian organizations, enabling effective planning, monitoring, and evaluation of field interventions. Despite the growing reliance on spatial data, many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) continue to struggle with data quality, operational efficiency, and integration of geospatial insights into decision-making. This study examines the impact of a structured GIS training program delivered to health field teams within the Hacey Health Initiative. Using a pre- and post-training design, the research measured changes in data accuracy, completeness, and collection efficiency during field operations. The intervention consisted of a targeted training curriculum incorporating ArcGIS Pro and Survey123, applied to routine health data collection processes. Data sources included field observation forms, device-generated logs, and quality control samples reviewed by supervisory staff. Accuracy audits were conducted on randomly selected data points, completeness was scored against standardized forms, and collection time metrics were captured from device logs. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all indicators, with accuracy scores increasing by 21.4%, completeness rising by 18.7%, and average data collection time per case reduced by 27.5% following the training. These findings underscore the value of structured GIS capacity-building for NGOs, particularly in resource-constrained health programs, where data-driven decision-making is critical for optimizing outcomes. The study concludes with recommendations for embedding GIS training into NGO operational frameworks, aligning field practices with emerging standards in digital health and geospatial analytics.},
keywords = {Geographic Information Systems, NGO Operations, Health Data Quality, Arcgis Pro, Survey123, Field Efficiency, Capacity-Building, Hacey Health Initiative},
month = {April},
}