Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Mobile Banking among Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Jigawa State

References

[1] Aboelmaged, M. G., & Gebba, T. R. (2013). Mobile banking adoption: An examination of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Business Research and Development, 2(1), 35–50.

[2] Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2016). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.002

[3] Alfani, D. S., Yuniarto, A., & Handrito, R. P. (2023). The effect of perceived ease of use on intention to use on Bank Syariah Indonesia mobile banking users is mediated by e-trust and religiosity as moderators. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 3(4), 1248–1259.

[4] Alsamydai, M. J. (2014). Adaptation of the technology acceptance model (TAM) to the use of mobile banking services. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(4), 2039–2051.

[5] Anene, I. A. (2021). Awareness, acceptance and usage of mobile banking services by academic librarians in Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1A–28.

[6] Bakr, A., Salahuddin, E., Chowdhury, I. A., Mahtab, H., & Khabir, L. (2017). Factors influencing the mobile banking adoption in the banking sector of Bangladesh. Australasian Journal of Business, Social Science and Information Technology, 3(3), 142–154.

[7] Bashir, D., Wadari, S., & Ibrahim, Y. (n.d.). Factors affecting the growth of small and medium scale enterprises in Jigawa State of Nigeria.

[8] Budiantara, M., Gunawan, H., & Utami, E. S. (2019). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust in online store, perceived risk as the trigger of online purchase intention SME product “Made in Indonesia” through the use of e-commerce marketplace. Mercu Buana Accounting Research Journal, 5(1), 19–27.

[9] Chen, L. (2008). A model of consumer acceptance of mobile payment. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 6(1), 32–52.

[10] Chitungo, S. K., & Munongo, S. (2013). Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile banking adoption in rural Zimbabwe. Journal of Business Administration and Education, 3(1), 51–79.

[11] Chong, A. Y.-L., Ooi, K.-B., Lin, B., & Tan, B.-I. (2010). Online banking adoption: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(4), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011054963

[12] Chuchuen, C. (2015). The perception of mobile banking adoption: The study of behavioral, security, and trust in Thailand. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(7), 547–550.

[13] Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Indiana University, USA. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2146436

[14] Crabbe, M., Standing, C., Standing, S., & Karjaluoto, H. (2009). An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 7(5), 515–543.

[15] Cruz, P., & Lamas-Galdo, L. (2010). Mobile banking rollout in emerging markets: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 342–371.

[16] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[17] Eniola, A. A. (2014). The role of SME firm performance in Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Oman Chapter), 3(12).

[18] Eze, S. C., & Nwankwo, F. (2019). Adoption of electronic banking by SMEs in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 13(2), 54–65.

[19] Faniran, A. O., & Odumeru, J. A. (2015). Acceptance of mobile banking in Nigeria: A modified TAM approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on eBusiness, eCommerce, eManagement, eLearning and eGovernance (IC5E 2015), 1, 39–49.

[20] Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

[21] Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (1999). Consumer trust in an internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00337.x

[22] Karma, N. G., Ibrahim, S. B., & Ali, A. H. (2014). Key factors affecting mobile banking adoption among banks’ customers in Sudan. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 2(6), 112–122.

[23] Khraim, D. H. S., Shoubaki, Y. E. A., & Khraim, A. S. (2011). Factors affecting Jordanian consumers’ adoption of mobile banking services. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(20), 96–105.

[24] Kim, G., Shin, B., & Lee, H. G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283–311.

[25] Kumar, V., Lall, A., & Mane, T. (2017). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to examine adoption of mobile banking services in India. Journal of Business and Management, 19(8), 82–93.

[26] Lema, A. (2017). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile financial services in the unbanked population. Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 37–51.

[27] McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.

[28] Mostafa, A. A. N., & Eneizan, B. (2018). Factors affecting acceptance of mobile banking in developing countries. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 340–351.

[29] Musa, U., Jaafar, M., & Raslim, F. M. (2023). E-procurement adoption in Nigeria: Perceptions from public sector employees. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 41(2), 45–62.

[30] Najib, M., & Fahma, F. (2020). Investigating the adoption of digital payment system through an extended technology acceptance model: An insight from Indonesian small and medium enterprises. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(4), 1702–1708.

[31] Nafiu, A. T., Jia, J. I. A., & Ugbedeojo, N. P. (2020). Determinants of the actual ICT adoption among small and medium enterprises in Kogi State. Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges, 9(3), 47–58.

[32] Ndubisi, N., & Sinti, Q. (2006). Consumer attitudes, system characteristics, and internet banking adoption in Malaysia. Management Research News, 29(8), 622–636.

[33] Omol, E., Abeka, S., & Wauyo, F. (2017). Factors influencing acceptance of mobile money applications in enterprise management: A case study of micro and small enterprise owners in Kisumu Central Business District, Kenya. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 6(1), 208–219.

[34] Pavlou, P., Tan, Y., & Gefen, D. (2003). Institutional trust and familiarity in online interorganizational relationships. Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Information Systems, 16(1), 1–15.

[35] Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

[36] Saidu, M. B., Maharazu, M. K., & Isa, A. (2023). Determinants for the acceptance of mobile money service in Nigeria. Science World Journal, 18(1), 125–132.

[37] Sayid, O., Echchabi, A., & Aziz, H. A. (2012). Investigating mobile money acceptance in Somalia: An empirical study. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 6(2), 269–281.

[38] Small and Medium Enterprises Development Agency of Nigeria (SMEDAN). (2013). National Policy on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Abuja: SMEDAN and Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment.

[39] Suh, B., & Han, I. (2003). The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 135–161.

[40] Sundara, A., & Perera, A. (2018). The factors influencing customer adoption of internet banking system: Special reference to the Sampath Bank in Colombo District. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 8(2), 47–57.

[41] Suoranta, M. (2003). Adoption of mobile banking in Finland (Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä).

[42] Torkzadeh, G., & Dhillon, G. (2002). Measuring factors that influence the success of internet commerce. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.187.87

[43] Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

[44] Zhou, T. (2011). An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile banking. Internet Research, 21(5), 527–540.

@article{1711305,
      author = {Sagiru Gambo, Nura Badamasi, Sadisu Abdul-AzeezMatazu},
      title = {Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Mobile Banking among Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Jigawa State},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {715-724},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711305.pdf},
      abstract = {The primary aim of this study is to examine the acceptance of mobile banking among small and medium scale enterprises in Nigeria. In achieving this, the Theory of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was employed with the extension of compatibility and trust. The study applied a survey method in which data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 331 small and medium scale enterprises in Jigawa State Nigeria. Special Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.00 was applied in analyzing the data. The result from the analysis showed that Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and compatibility have a positive and significant impact on the acceptance of mobile banking. Conversely, trust has no significant effect on acceptance of mobile banking, indicating that security and reliability concerns still hinder adoption. The model explained 72.6% of the variation in mobile banking acceptance, signifying strong explanatory power. Its suggested that banks should invest in advanced fraud detection, encryption, and multi-factor authentication to build user confidence. However, banking sector should organize sensitization workshops among small and medium enterprises to demonstrate the ease and usefulness of mobile banking. Lastly, it is hoped that the findings of this study will provide insights for future research in this vital area.},
      keywords = {TAM, Mobile Banking, SMEs, Compatibility and Trust},
      month = {October},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711305-4244}
  }