Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711324
A Framework for Effective Project Management in Remote Teams: Tools, Techniques, and Best Practices for Success
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Remote Project Management
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I4-1711324-6041
Abstract
The move towards remote work has transformed the project management environment, presenting new challenges and opportunities for organisations that can operate in a dynamic environment. Traditional models created by co-located teams often fail to accurately reflect the dynamics of virtual collaboration, including the dependence on digital tools, cultural diversity, and the urgent need for trust-building. This paper proposes a conceptual model that enhances the performance of remote team project management by integrating four interdependent constructs: processes, tools, techniques, and best practices. The framework is inspired by well-known theories, including Agile, Lean, Communication Theory, Media Richness Theory, and Virtual Team Theory, which are adapted to the realities of dispersed work. The processes of project management provide program structure, collaboration facilitation tools, task execution methods, and best practices that take care of human and cultural aspects. These constructs are interlinked, which guarantees the complex approach to providing a balance between technical efficiency and interpersonal effectiveness. The paper identifies the theoretical value of expanding the project management discourse to the virtual. It offers practical advice for managers on how to navigate dispersed collaboration and the organisational consequences of it in terms of policy and standardisation. The framework provides a versatile and adaptable framework that can assist researchers and practitioners in maximizing the performance of projects in the ever-digitizing world by filling gaps in traditional models.
Keywords
Remote, project management, Agile, Lean, Communication Theory, Media Richness Theory, and Virtual Team Theory.
References
[1] Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2016). Agile project management and stage-gate model—A hybrid framework for technology-based companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 1–14.
[2] Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
[3] Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600.
[4] Ford, R. C., Piccolo, R. F., & Ford, L. R. (2022). Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is key. Business Horizons, 65(1), 25–34.
[5] Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.
[6] Gibson, C. B., Dunlop, P. D., & Raghav, S. (2021). Navigating differences: The value of familiarity and shared context for mitigating process losses in global virtual teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(5), 945–970. Gilson, L. L., Litchfield, R. C., & Gilson, P. W. (2021). The value of value congruence for virtual teams. Journal of Management, 47(4), 827–855.
[7] Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337.
[8] Hacker, J. V., Johnson, M., Saunders, C., & Thayer, A. L. (2020). Trust in virtual teams: A multidisciplinary review and integration. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 24.
[9] Hoda, R., & Murugesan, L. K. (2016). Multi-level agile project management challenges: A self-organizing team perspective. Journal of Systems and Software, 117, 245–257.
[10] Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., ... Van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2021). Project management: The managerial process (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
[11] Nurmi, N., Hinds, P. J., & Koroma, J. (2023). Beyond being there: Revisiting the dynamics of mediated collaboration in the post-pandemic era. Organization Science. Advance online publication.
[12] Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute, Inc.
[13] Schmidt, C., Staudt, N., & Müller, R. (2021). The impact of digital project management: A systematic literature review. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100023.
[14] Shockley, K. M., Gabriel, A. S., Robertson, D., Rosen, C. C., Chawla, N., Ganster, M. L., & Ezerins, M. E. (2021). The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1137–1155.
[15] Škudienė, V., Auruskeviciene, V., & Sukeviciute, L. (2020). International project management: A culture-based managerial approach. Journal of International Studies, 13(1), 227–241.
[16] Strode, D. E., Dingsøyr, T., & Lindsjørn, Y. (2022). A teamwork effectiveness model for agile software development. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(2), 56.
[17] Watson-Manheim, M. B., Chudoba, K. M., & Crowston, K. (2012). Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work. Information Systems Journal, 22(1), 29–52.
[18] Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1711324,
author = {Anthony Peter Ogbaka},
title = {A Framework for Effective Project Management in Remote Teams: Tools, Techniques, and Best Practices for Success},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {4},
pages = {1117-1121},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711324.pdf},
abstract = {The move towards remote work has transformed the project management environment, presenting new challenges and opportunities for organisations that can operate in a dynamic environment. Traditional models created by co-located teams often fail to accurately reflect the dynamics of virtual collaboration, including the dependence on digital tools, cultural diversity, and the urgent need for trust-building. This paper proposes a conceptual model that enhances the performance of remote team project management by integrating four interdependent constructs: processes, tools, techniques, and best practices. The framework is inspired by well-known theories, including Agile, Lean, Communication Theory, Media Richness Theory, and Virtual Team Theory, which are adapted to the realities of dispersed work. The processes of project management provide program structure, collaboration facilitation tools, task execution methods, and best practices that take care of human and cultural aspects. These constructs are interlinked, which guarantees the complex approach to providing a balance between technical efficiency and interpersonal effectiveness. The paper identifies the theoretical value of expanding the project management discourse to the virtual. It offers practical advice for managers on how to navigate dispersed collaboration and the organisational consequences of it in terms of policy and standardisation. The framework provides a versatile and adaptable framework that can assist researchers and practitioners in maximizing the performance of projects in the ever-digitizing world by filling gaps in traditional models.},
keywords = {Remote, project management, Agile, Lean, Communication Theory, Media Richness Theory, and Virtual Team Theory.},
month = {October},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711324-6041}
}