Conceptual Framework for Scalable and Secure Cloud Architectures for Enterprise Messaging

References

[1] Bounfour, A., 2016. Digital futures, digital transformation. Progress in IS, 10, pp.978-973.

[2] Damodaran, D. and Helminen, F., 2016. The Impact of Strategy to Real Time Chat Process: A Qualitative Multi-Method Study in the E-commerce Context.

[3] Sinha, S.R. and Park, Y., 2017. Building an E Ective IoT Ecosystem for Your Business. Springer.

[4] Lehmacher, W., 2017. The global supply chain. Springer.

[5] Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Sree Ramaswamy, P., DC, W. and Chu, M., 2017. Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier.

[6] Baccarelli, E., Naranjo, P.G.V., Scarpiniti, M., Shojafar, M. and Abawajy, J.H., 2017. Fog of everything: Energy-efficient networked computing architectures, research challenges, and a case study. IEEE access, 5, pp.9882-9910.

[7] Pereira, T., Barreto, L. and Amaral, A., 2017. Network and information security challenges within Industry 4.0 paradigm. Procedia manufacturing, 13, pp.1253-1260.

[8] Abomhara, M. and Køien, G.M., 2015. Cyber security and the internet of things: vulnerabilities, threats, intruders and attacks. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 4(1), pp.65-88.

[9] Sikeridis, D., Papapanagiotou, I., Rimal, B.P. and Devetsikiotis, M., 2017. A Comparative taxonomy and survey of public cloud infrastructure vendors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.01476.

[10] Omopariola, M. and Lead, C.D., 2016. Zero-Trust Architecture Deployment in Emerging Economies: A Case Study from Nigeria [online]

[11] Chauhan, M.A., Babar, M.A. and Benatallah, B., 2017. Architecting cloud‐enabled systems: a systematic survey of challenges and solutions. Software: Practice and Experience, 47(4), pp.599-644.

[12] Panetto, H., Zdravkovic, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Romero, D., Cecil, J. and Mezgár, I., 2016. New perspectives for the future interoperable enterprise systems. Computers in industry, 79, pp.47-63.

[13] Glachant, J.M., Rossetto, N. and Vasconcelos, J., 2017. Moving the electricity transmission system towards a decarbonised and integrated Europe: Missing pillars and roadblocks.

[14] Miller, M. and Abbas, N., 2017. Building Trust by Eliminating It: The Rise of Zero-Trust Models in Sub-Saharan Africa.

[15] Smith, O., Johnson, J. and Oscar, E., 2017. Rethinking Cyber Defense: Zero-Trust Implementation in Nigeria's Cloud Ecosystem.

[16] Lodhia, S., 2015. Exploring the transition to integrated reporting through a practice lens: an Australian customer owned bank perspective. Journal of business ethics, 129(3), pp.585-598.

[17] Sovacool, B.K. and Hess, D.J., 2017. Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social studies of science, 47(5), pp.703-750.

[18] Afriyie, D., 2017. LEVERAGING PREDICTIVE PEOPLE ANALYTICS TO OPTIMIZE WORKFORCE MOBILITY, TALENT RETENTION, AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE IN GLOBAL ENTERPRISES [online]

[19] Reddy, A.R.S. and Zaheer, F., 2017. Advancing Workforce Mobility through Data-Driven HR Technology Solutions.

[20] Chang, V., Kuo, Y.H. and Ramachandran, M., 2016. Cloud computing adoption framework: A security framework for business clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems, 57, pp.24-41.

[21] Alwadain, A., Fielt, E., Korthaus, A. and Rosemann, M., 2016. Empirical insights into the development of a service-oriented enterprise architecture. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 105, pp.39-52.

[22] Decaneto, A., 2016. Design and testing of an active big data architecture for social and crowding emergency management.

[23] Raj, P. and Raman, A.C., 2017. The Internet of Things: Enabling technologies, platforms, and use cases. Auerbach Publications.

[24] Salah, T., Zemerly, M.J., Yeun, C.Y., Al-Qutayri, M. and Al-Hammadi, Y., 2016, December. The evolution of distributed systems towards microservices architecture. In 2016 11th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST) (pp. 318-325). IEEE.

[25] Leymann, F., Breitenbücher, U., Wagner, S. and Wettinger, J., 2016, April. Native cloud applications: why monolithic virtualization is not their foundation. In International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science (pp. 16-40). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[26] Li, Z., Zhang, Y. and Liu, Y., 2017. Towards a full-stack devops environment (platform-as-a-service) for cloud-hosted applications. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 22(01), pp.1-9.

[27] Yangui, S., Ravindran, P., Bibani, O., Glitho, R.H., Hadj-Alouane, N.B., Morrow, M.J. and Polakos, P.A., 2016, June. A platform as-a-service for hybrid cloud/fog environments. In 2016 IEEE international symposium on local and metropolitan area networks (LANMAN) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

[28] Salahuddin, M.A., Sahoo, J., Glitho, R., Elbiaze, H. and Ajib, W., 2017. A survey on content placement algorithms for cloud-based content delivery networks. IEEE Access, 6, pp.91-114.

[29] Wang, M., Jayaraman, P.P., Ranjan, R., Mitra, K., Zhang, M., Li, E., Khan, S., Pathan, M. and Georgeakopoulos, D., 2015. An overview of cloud based content delivery networks: Research dimensions and state-of-the-art. Transactions on large-scale data-and knowledge-centered systems XX: special issue on advanced techniques for big data management, pp.131-158.

[30] Silic, M., Silic, D. and Oblakovic, G., 2016. Influence of Shadow IT on innovation in organizations. Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly CSIMQ, (8), pp.68-80.

[31] Kim, D. and Solomon, M.G., 2016. Fundamentals of information systems security. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

[32] Hill, D.G., 2016. Data protection: Governance, risk management, and compliance. CRC Press.

[33] Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Karagiannis, D., Thoenssen, B., Van der Merwe, A. and Woitsch, R., 2016. A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and IT: Combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology. Computers in Industry, 79, pp.77-86.

[34] Robles, T., Alcarria, R., de Andrés, D.M., de la Cruz, M.N., Calero, R., Iglesias, S. and Lopez, M., 2015. An IoT based reference architecture for smart water management processes. J. Wirel. Mob. Networks Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl., 6(1), pp.4-23.

[35] Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R. and Jardim-Goncalves, R., 2016. Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Computers in industry, 79, pp.64-76.

[36] Ostrom, A.L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D.E., Patrício, L. and Voss, C.A., 2015. Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. Journal of service research, 18(2), pp.127-159.

[37] Kumar, A., Brown, O. and Oscar, E., 2017. From Vulnerability to Vigilance: Building Secure National Cloud Networks with Zero-Trust Architecture.

[38] Shetty, S., Red, V., Kamhoua, C., Kwiat, K. and Njilla, L., 2017, May. Data provenance assurance in the cloud using blockchain. In Disruptive Technologies in Sensors and Sensor Systems (Vol. 10206, pp. 125-135). SPIE.

[39] Aaron, A., 2015. Facilitating distributed generation in Australia-the opportunities and challenges of cogeneration.

[40] Nostro, N., 2015. Model-based Approaches to Dependability and Security Assessment in Critical and Dynamic Systems.

[41] Wu, D., Rosen, D.W., Wang, L. and Schaefer, D., 2015. Cloud-based design and manufacturing: A new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation. Computer-aided design, 59, pp.1-14.

[42] Shivakumar, S.K., 2016. Enterprise content and search management for building digital platforms. John Wiley & Sons.

[43] Kauppi, K. and Van Raaij, E.M., 2015. Opportunism and honest incompetence—seeking explanations for noncompliance in public procurement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), pp.953-979.

[44] Khan, S., Gani, A., Wahab, A.W.A., Bagiwa, M.A., Shiraz, M., Khan, S.U., Buyya, R. and Zomaya, A.Y., 2016. Cloud log forensics: Foundations, state of the art, and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 49(1), pp.1-42.

[45] Miranskyy, A., Hamou-Lhadj, A., Cialini, E. and Larsson, A., 2016. Operational-log analysis for big data systems: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Software, 33(2), pp.52-59.

[46] Kousalya, G., Balakrishnan, P. and Raj, C.P., 2017. Automated workflow scheduling in self-adaptive clouds (pp. 65-83). Berlin: Springer.

[47] Hosken, M., 2016. VMware software-defined storage: A design guide to the policy-driven, software-defined storage era. John Wiley & Sons.

[48] Fortino, G., Savaglio, C., Palau, C.E., De Puga, J.S., Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Montesinos, M., Liotta, A. and Llop, M., 2017. Towards multi-layer interoperability of heterogeneous IoT platforms: The INTER-IoT approach. In Integration, interconnection, and interoperability of IoT systems (pp. 199-232). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[49] Bawany, N.Z. and Shamsi, J.A., 2015. Smart city architecture: Vision and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(11).

[50] Jiang, Y., 2015. A survey of task allocation and load balancing in distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 27(2), pp.585-599.

[51] Boero, L., Cello, M., Garibotto, C., Marchese, M. and Mongelli, M., 2016. BeaQoS: Load balancing and deadline management of queues in an OpenFlow SDN switch. Computer Networks, 106, pp.161-170.

[52] Ali, S., Qaisar, S.B., Saeed, H., Farhan Khan, M., Naeem, M. and Anpalagan, A., 2015. Network challenges for cyber physical systems with tiny wireless devices: A case study on reliable pipeline condition monitoring. Sensors, 15(4), pp.7172-7205.

[53] Olwal, T.O., Djouani, K. and Kurien, A.M., 2016. A survey of resource management toward 5G radio access networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), pp.1656-1686.

[54] Teece, D.J., 2017. Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: standards, complementary assets, and business models in the wireless world. Research Policy (forthcoming).

[55] Vives, X., 2017. The impact of FinTech on banking. European Economy, (2), pp.97-105.

[56] Cohen, B., Hall, B. and Wood, C., 2017. Data localization laws and their impact on privacy, data security and the global economy. Antitrust, 32, p.107.

[57] Daley, M.J., Priebe, J. and Zeller, P., 2015. The impact of emerging Asia-Pacific data protection and data residency requirements on transnational information governance and cross-border discovery. In Sedona Conf. J. (Vol. 16, p. 201).

[58] Sparrow, P., Hird, M. and Cooper, C.L., 2015. Strategic talent management. In Do We Need HR? Repositioning People Management for Success (pp. 177-212). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

[59] Rübsamen, T., Pulls, T. and Reich, C., 2015, May. Security and privacy preservation of evidence in cloud accountability audits. In International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science (pp. 95-114). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[60] Yang, R. and Xu, J., 2016, March. Computing at massive scale: Scalability and dependability challenges. In 2016 IEEE symposium on service-oriented system engineering (SOSE) (pp. 386-397). IEEE.

[61] Korhonen, J.J. and Halén, M., 2017, July. Enterprise architecture for digital transformation. In 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (Vol. 1, pp. 349-358). IEEE.

[62] Bhatt, V., Brutti, A., Burns, M. and Frascella, A., 2017, July. An approach to provide shared architectural principles for interoperable smart cities. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 415-426). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[63] Korhonen, J.J. and Halén, M., 2017, July. Enterprise architecture for digital transformation. In 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (Vol. 1, pp. 349-358). IEEE.

[64] Nicho, M., Khan, S. and Rahman, M.S.M.K., 2017, September. Managing information security risk using integrated governance risk and compliance. In 2017 International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA) (pp. 56-66). IEEE.

@article{1711330,
      author = {Kabir Sholagberu Ahmed, Olushola Damilare Odejobi},
      title = {Conceptual Framework for Scalable and Secure Cloud Architectures for Enterprise Messaging},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {127-141},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711330.pdf},
      abstract = {The rapid digitization of business operations has amplified the importance of enterprise messaging as a core enabler of collaboration, customer engagement, and workflow automation. However, the proliferation of distributed teams, real-time communications, and mission-critical applications necessitates cloud-based messaging platforms that are both scalable and secure. This proposes a conceptual framework for scalable and secure cloud architectures designed specifically for enterprise messaging environments. The framework integrates three key dimensions: scalability, security, and interoperability. Scalability is addressed through elastic cloud-native components such as container orchestration, microservices, and distributed message queues, ensuring that platforms dynamically adapt to fluctuating workloads and global demand. Security is embedded at multiple layers, incorporating zero-trust principles, end-to-end encryption, identity and access management (IAM), and compliance-aware logging to protect sensitive business communications against cyber threats and regulatory risks. Interoperability ensures seamless integration across heterogeneous enterprise systems, legacy platforms, and third-party applications through the use of standardized APIs, middleware connectors, and federated protocols. The conceptual model also highlights resilience through multi-region deployment, fault-tolerant architectures, and automated recovery mechanisms, ensuring continuity in the face of systemic disruptions. Furthermore, it incorporates governance and monitoring frameworks that leverage artificial intelligence for anomaly detection, threat intelligence, and performance optimization. By synthesizing these dimensions, the proposed framework provides a pathway for organizations to modernize enterprise messaging infrastructure while mitigating operational, financial, and reputational risks. Beyond immediate efficiency gains, such architectures enable enterprises to unlock innovation in areas such as omnichannel engagement, real-time analytics, and AI-assisted communication. The study concludes that a secure, scalable, and standards-driven cloud architecture is foundational to the future of enterprise messaging, enabling businesses to achieve agility, trust, and resilience in an increasingly interconnected digital economy.},
      keywords = {Conceptual Framework For Scalable And Secure Cloud Architectures For Enterprise Messaging: Cloud Computing, Enterprise Messaging, Scalable Architecture, Secure Cloud Solutions, Message Queueing, Microservices Integration, High Availability, Fault Tolerance, Distributed Systems, Data Encryption, Access Control, Identity Management, Real-Time Messaging, Performance Optimization, Multi-Tenant Architecture},
      month = {July},
  }