Home / Current Issue / Paper 1712379
Voices from the Digital Underground: Exploring Cybercrime Pathways in Nigeria?s Crypto Ecosystem
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Cybercrime and Criminology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I2-1712379
Abstract
The rise of cryptocurrency has revolutionized the digital economy, creating new possibilities for financial innovation, privacy, and global transactions. However, it has also given rise to cybercrime pathways that leverage blockchain technology for illicit purposes. This paper examines the nature and mechanisms of cybercrime pathways in the global cryptocurrency ecosystem through a qualitative comparative analysis of secondary data sources. These sources include peer-reviewed literature, regulatory reports, cybersecurity reports, and documented case evidence. The analysis focuses on the sociotechnical factors, operational patterns, and online communities driving crypto-enabled cybercrime, as well as the institutional responses and dynamics influencing these pathways. The study aims to explore how cryptocurrencies facilitate different types of cyber-enabled crime and how factors such as regulatory frameworks, enforcement capacity, and technological developments impact their evolution. The findings shed light on the interplay between crypto-based criminal innovation and regulatory adaptation, highlighting key challenges such as anonymity, weak oversight, cross-border enforcement, and limited digital literacy. While cryptocurrency offers opportunities for financial empowerment and innovation, the study underscores the importance of coordinated governance, robust law enforcement efforts, and responsible technology development in mitigating associated risks. This analysis contributes to the ongoing discourse on cryptocurrency regulation, cybercrime prevention, and the evolving dynamics of the digital underground.
Keywords
Cryptocurrency; Cybercrime; Digital Underground; Blockchain Misuse; Comparative Assessment; Cybersecurity; Secondary Data Analysis; Illicit Finance; Digital Forensics; Cryptocurrency Regulation
References
[1] Akhihiero, G. (2024). Cryptocurrency and cybersecurity in Nigeria: Assessing Nigeria’s regulatory response to emerging technologies and financial crimes. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4889709
[2] Aldridge, J., & Décary-Hétu, D. (2016). Hidden wholesale: The drug diffusing capacity of online drug cryptomarkets. International Journal of Drug Policy, 35, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.021
[3] Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. (2017). FinTech, regtech and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37(3), 371–414. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol37/iss3/2/
[4] Ayadi, O. F., Paseda, O., Oke, B. O., & Oladimeji, A. (2024). A survey of attitudes, behaviors and experiences of Nigerian investors in cryptocurrencies. Journal of Internet and Digital Economics, 4(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDE-11-2023-0023
[5] Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.2.213
[6] Bourdillon, O. O. (2023). The effect of online fraud on the adoption of digital economy in Nigeria: A review. African Journal of Management and Business Research, 10(1), 26–33. https://publications.afropolitanjournals.com/index.php/ajmbr/article/view/380
[7] Chainalysis. (2023). Crypto crime report 2023. Chainalysis Research. https://go.chainalysis.com/2023-crypto-crime-report.html
[8] Corbet, S., Larkin, C., & Lucey, B. (2020). The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101554
[9] Décary-Hétu, D., & Giommoni, L. (2017). Do police crackdowns disrupt drug cryptomarkets? A longitudinal analysis. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9644-4
[10] Dierksmeier, C., & Seele, P. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3298-0
[11] European Commission. (2023). Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32023R1114
[12] Europol. (2021). Internet organised crime threat assessment (IOCTA). https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/internet_organised_crime_threat_assessment_iocta_2021.pdf
[13] Europol. (2022). Cryptocurrency crime report. https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/Europol%20Spotlight%20-%20Cryptocurrencies%20-%20Tracing%20the%20evolution%20of%20criminal%20finances.pdf
[14] FATF. (2021). Updated guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual assets and VASPs. Financial Action Task Force. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/RBA-VA-VASPs.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
[15] FATF. (2023). Illicit financial flows from cyber-enabled fraud. Financial Action Task Force. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/reports/Illicit-financial-flows-cyber-enabled-fraud.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
[16] Foley, S., Karlsen, J. R., & Putniņš, T. J. (2019). Sex, drugs, and Bitcoin: How much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies? Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1798–1853. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz015
[17] Garba, K. H., Lazarus, S., & Button, M. (2024). An assessment of convicted cryptocurrency fraudsters. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2403294
[18] Harding, N., Cooper, E., Sales, T., McDonald, A., & Kingston, S. (2025). The liminality of fraud: Reimagining fraud theory to inform financial crime prevention. British Journal of Criminology, 65(3), 618–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azae069
[19] Houben, R., & Snyers, A. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and blockchain: Legal context and implications. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/619024/IPOL_STU(2018)619024_EN.pdf
[20] Hutchings, A., & Holt, T. J. (2015). A qualitative examination of the online identity theft ecosystem. Deviant Behavior, 36(4), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.944074
[21] IMF. (2022). Global financial stability report: COVID-19, crypto, and climate. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2021/october/english/text.pdf
[22] Kalacheva, A., Kuznetsov, P., Vodolazov, I., & Yanovich, Y. (2024). Detecting rug pulls in decentralized exchanges: The rise of meme coins. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4981529
[23] Kavaloski, M. (2024). A global crypto code of conduct: Crafting an internationally centralized regulatory body for decentralized assets. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 57(1). https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol57/iss1/1/
[24] Leukfeldt, E. R., Kleemans, E. R., & Stol, W. P. H. (2017). Cybercriminal networks: Social ties and online forums. British Journal of Criminology, 57(3), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw009
[25] Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691171692/bitcoin-and-cryptocurrency-technologies
[26] Navani, S., & Cirella, G. T. (2024). Cybercrimes in the cryptocurrency domain: Identifying types, motives, and techniques. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 14(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.26881/jgps.2024.2.01
[27] Odeke, D. O. (2024). Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and financial accountability in Nigeria. African Journal of Management and Business Research, 17(1), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.62154/ajmbr.2024.017.010505
[28] Omijeh, B. O. (2023). The effect of online fraud on the adoption of digital economy in Nigeria: A review. African Journal of Management and Business Research, 10(1), 26–33. https://publications.afropolitanjournals.com/index.php/ajmbr/article/view/380
[29] Rysin, V., & Rysin, M. (2021). Vulnerability of virtual assets to illicit financial flows. Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management, 8(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.23939/eem2021.01.035
[30] Tuleun, W. (2021). Cryptocurrency and cybercrime in Nigeria: A double-edged sword. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 8(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2021.8.2.0120
[31] Yekta, S. (2019). The social construction of online fraud (Doctoral thesis). Goldsmiths, University of London. https://doi.org/10.25602/GOLD.00027649
How to cite this paper
@article{1712379,
author = {Busmond Obialom Okeke},
title = {Voices from the Digital Underground: Exploring Cybercrime Pathways in Nigeria?s Crypto Ecosystem},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2022},
volume = {6},
number = {2},
pages = {414-425},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712379.pdf},
abstract = {The rise of cryptocurrency has revolutionized the digital economy, creating new possibilities for financial innovation, privacy, and global transactions. However, it has also given rise to cybercrime pathways that leverage blockchain technology for illicit purposes. This paper examines the nature and mechanisms of cybercrime pathways in the global cryptocurrency ecosystem through a qualitative comparative analysis of secondary data sources. These sources include peer-reviewed literature, regulatory reports, cybersecurity reports, and documented case evidence. The analysis focuses on the sociotechnical factors, operational patterns, and online communities driving crypto-enabled cybercrime, as well as the institutional responses and dynamics influencing these pathways. The study aims to explore how cryptocurrencies facilitate different types of cyber-enabled crime and how factors such as regulatory frameworks, enforcement capacity, and technological developments impact their evolution. The findings shed light on the interplay between crypto-based criminal innovation and regulatory adaptation, highlighting key challenges such as anonymity, weak oversight, cross-border enforcement, and limited digital literacy. While cryptocurrency offers opportunities for financial empowerment and innovation, the study underscores the importance of coordinated governance, robust law enforcement efforts, and responsible technology development in mitigating associated risks. This analysis contributes to the ongoing discourse on cryptocurrency regulation, cybercrime prevention, and the evolving dynamics of the digital underground.},
keywords = {Cryptocurrency; Cybercrime; Digital Underground; Blockchain Misuse; Comparative Assessment; Cybersecurity; Secondary Data Analysis; Illicit Finance; Digital Forensics; Cryptocurrency Regulation},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I2-1712379}
}