Home / Current Issue / Paper 1712509
A Study on Operational Barriers and Their Effect on Sustainability in Textile SME?s
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712509
Abstract
This research examines how operational challenges affect the sustainability efforts of small and medium-sized textile enterprises. Many textile SMEs encounter difficulties in implementing environmental and social initiatives due to insufficient access to green technologies, financial resources, and managerial expertise. To identify key operational challenges and evaluate their effect on sustainability outcomes, we conducted a survey of Indian textile SMEs and analyzed related literature. Our findings indicate that the implementation of sustainable practices is significantly hindered by technological and financial limitations, while organizational factors such as awareness and training also play a crucial role. We include tables that summarize survey results and regression analyses to illustrate these relationships. Based on our findings, we offer targeted recommendations to help textile SMEs navigate challenges and improve their environmental performance, including financial support, technology transfer initiatives, and capacity development programs. By focusing on the resource-limited SME sector, this study addresses a critical gap and provides valuable insights for managers and policymakers.
Keywords
Textile Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Environmental Sustainability, Operational Challenges, Financial Limitations, Technological Barriers, Sustainable Growth.
References
[1] Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, M. (2025). Challenges and opportunities for manufacturing SMEs in adopting Industry 4.0 technologies for achieving sustainability: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Operations Management Research, 18, 718–743.
[2] Yadav, A., Garg, R. K., & Sachdeva, A. K. (2022). Application of machine learning for sustainability in manufacturing supply chain – Industry 4.0 perspective: A bibliometric based review for future research. In IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM 2022), pp. 1427–1431.
[3] Dohale, V., et al. (2023). Evaluating circular economy and smart technology adoption barriers in the Indian textile and apparel industries using neutrosophic ISM. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05651-5
[4] Dabhilkar, M., & Åhlström, P. (2013). Converging production models: The STS versus lean production debate revisited. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(8), 1019–1039.
[5] Cusumano, M. A., et al. (2021). Commentaries on the lenses of lean. Journal of Operations Management, 67, 627–639.
[6] Frank, A. G., Thürer, M., Godinho Filho, M., & Marodin, G. A. (2024). Beyond Industry 4.0 – integrating Lean, digital technologies and people. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(7/8), 1109–1126.
[7] Marcon, É., Soliman, M., Gerstlberger, W., & Frank, A. G. (2022). Sociotechnical factors and Industry 4.0: An integrative perspective for the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(2), 259–286.
[8] Akram, M. W., et al. (2024). Blockchain technology in a crisis: Advantages, challenges, and lessons learned for enhancing food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140034.
[9] Khan, A. A., et al. (2025). BAML: A decentralized approach to secure, privacy-preserving financial compliance for enhancing anti-money laundering with blockchain hyperledger and federated learning. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 18, Article 270.
[10] Hossain, M. I., et al. (2025). Nexus among green entrepreneurship orientation, green ambidexterity innovation, green technological turbulence, and green performance: Moderated-mediation evidence from Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(10), 2761–2783.
[11] Acquah, I. S. K. (2024). Unravelling the asymmetric effects of procurement practices on firm performance: A complexity theory approach to complementing fsQCA with NCA. Heliyon, 10(1), e12345.
[12] Qureshi, K. M., et al. (2025). Analysing Lean 4.0 adoption factors towards manufacturing sustainability in SMEs: A hybrid ANN-Fuzzy ISM framework. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 17265. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01076-1
[13] Sarker, M. S. I., & Bartok, I. (2024). Global trends of green manufacturing research in the textile industry using bibliometric analysis. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 9, 100578.
[14] Tortorella, G. L., et al. (2021). Bundles of lean automation practices and principles and their impact on operational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 235, 108106.
[15] Abbas, H., et al. (2025). Exploring partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) applications in supply chain research: A bibliometric analysis and science mapping approach. Operations Research Forum, 6, 142.
[16] Batra, S. (2025). Exploring the application of PLS-SEM in construction management research: A bibliometric and meta-analysis approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(3), 2697–2727.
[17] Alayón, C. L., Säfsten, K., & Johansson, G. (2022). Barriers and enablers for the adoption of sustainable manufacturing by manufacturing SMEs. Sustainability, 14(4), 2364. doi:10.3390/su14042364
[18] Alipour, A., & Rahimpour, M. (2020). Sustainability barriers in SMEs: A study of strength of sustainability barriers and practical solutions in green product lifecycle at SMEs. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Green Manufacturing (SGM 2020), pp. 250–260.
[19] Naradda Gamage, S. K., et al. (2020). A review of global challenges and survival strategies of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Economies, 8(4), 79. doi:10.3390/economies8040079
[20] Jayasundara, J., Rajapakshe, P., Prasanna, R., Ekanayake, E., & Gamage, S. (2020). How do SMEs face sustainability challenges in the competition? A systemic review. Peradeniya Management Review, 2(2), 39. doi:10.4038/pmr.v2i2.39
[21] Salman, A., Simon, B., & Gillette, C. (2017). What’s happening in the missing middle?: Lessons from financing SMEs. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7917.
[22] Jansson, J., Nilsson, J., Modig, F., & Hed Vall, G. (2017). Commitment to sustainability in small and medium-sized enterprises: The influence of strategic orientations and management values. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 69–83. doi:10.1002/bse.1901
[23] Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2018). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
[24] Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations.
[25] Muthu, S. S. (2020). Assessing the Environmental Impact of Textiles and the Clothing Supply Chain. Woodhead Publishing. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-819783-7.00010-7
[26] Bellgran, M., & Säfsten, K. (2010). Production System Development. Springer, London. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-495-9_4
[27] Textile Megastore. (2021). Textile Industry: Significance and Advantages. (Industry Report).
[28] Costa, C., Azoia, N., Silva, C. J., & Marques, E. (2020). Textile industry in a changing world: Challenges of sustainable development. U. Porto Journal of Engineering, 6(2), 86–97. doi:10.24840/2183-6493_006.002_0008
[29] Kazancoglu, I., Kazancoglu, Y., Yarimoğlu, E., & Kahraman, A. (2020). A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1477–1492. doi:10.1002/sd.2100
[30] Despeisse, M., et al. (2021). Achieving circular and efficient production systems: Emerging challenges from industrial cases. In Advances in Production Management Systems, Springer, pp. 523–533. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85910-7_55
How to cite this paper
@article{1712509,
author = {A. Tejaswini, Dr. T.V.S.S. Swathi},
title = {A Study on Operational Barriers and Their Effect on Sustainability in Textile SME?s},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {240-246},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712509.pdf},
abstract = {This research examines how operational challenges affect the sustainability efforts of small and medium-sized textile enterprises. Many textile SMEs encounter difficulties in implementing environmental and social initiatives due to insufficient access to green technologies, financial resources, and managerial expertise. To identify key operational challenges and evaluate their effect on sustainability outcomes, we conducted a survey of Indian textile SMEs and analyzed related literature. Our findings indicate that the implementation of sustainable practices is significantly hindered by technological and financial limitations, while organizational factors such as awareness and training also play a crucial role. We include tables that summarize survey results and regression analyses to illustrate these relationships. Based on our findings, we offer targeted recommendations to help textile SMEs navigate challenges and improve their environmental performance, including financial support, technology transfer initiatives, and capacity development programs. By focusing on the resource-limited SME sector, this study addresses a critical gap and provides valuable insights for managers and policymakers.},
keywords = {Textile Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Environmental Sustainability, Operational Challenges, Financial Limitations, Technological Barriers, Sustainable Growth.},
month = {December},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1712509}
}