Review of Network Protocol Stability Techniques for Enterprise Information Systems

References

[1] Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R. and Jardim-Goncalves, R., 2016. Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Computers in industry, 79, pp.64-76.

[2] Ahmed, E.S.A. and Elatif, R.E., 2015. Network denial of service threat security on cloud computing a survey. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol.

[3] Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M. and Ayyash, M., 2015. Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 17(4), pp.2347-2376.

[4] Allman, M., Beverly, R. and Trammell, B., 2017. Principles for measurability in protocol design. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 47(2), pp.2-12.

[5] Anater, A., Manyes, L., Meca, G., Ferrer, E., Luciano, F.B., Pimpão, C.T. and Font, G., 2016. Mycotoxins and their consequences in aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture, 451, pp.1-10.

[6] Antero, M.C., 2015. A multi-case analysis of the development of enterprise resource planning systems (ERP) business practices. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS).

[7] Bajpai, V. and Schönwälder, J., 2015. A survey on internet performance measurement platforms and related standardization efforts. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(3), pp.1313-1341.

[8] Bakhshi, T., 2017. State of the art and recent research advances in software defined networking. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2017(1), p.7191647.

[9] Bentaleb, A., Begen, A.C., Zimmermann, R. and Harous, S., 2017. SDNHAS: An SDN-enabled architecture to optimize QoE in HTTP adaptive streaming. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(10), pp.2136-2151.

[10] Boraten, T. and Kodi, A.K., 2017. Runtime techniques to mitigate soft errors in network-on-chip (NoC) architectures. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 37(3), pp.682-695.

[11] Bouton, S., Knupfer, S.M., Mihov, I. and Swartz, S., 2015. Urban mobility at a tipping point. McKinsey Global Institute.

[12] Bui, N., Cesana, M., Hosseini, S.A., Liao, Q., Malanchini, I. and Widmer, J., 2017. A survey of anticipatory mobile networking: Context-based classification, prediction methodologies, and optimization techniques. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), pp.1790-1821.

[13] Canini, M., Kuznetsov, P., Levin, D. and Schmid, S., 2015, April. A distributed and robust SDN control plane for transactional network updates. In 2015 IEEE conference on computer communications (INFOCOM) (pp. 190-198). IEEE.

[14] Caria, M., Jukan, A. and Hoffmann, M., 2016. SDN partitioning: A centralized control plane for distributed routing protocols. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 13(3), pp.381-393.

[15] Chaufournier, L., Sharma, P., Le, F., Nahum, E., Shenoy, P. and Towsley, D., 2017, October. Fast transparent virtual machine migration in distributed edge clouds. In Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing (pp. 1-13).

[16] Chen, D., Cong, J., Gurumani, S., Hwu, W.M., Rupnow, K. and Zhang, Z., 2016. Platform choices and design demands for IoT platforms: cost, power, and performance tradeoffs. IET Cyber‐Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 1(1), pp.70-77.

[17] Cintuglu, M.H., Mohammed, O.A., Akkaya, K. and Uluagac, A.S., 2016. A survey on smart grid cyber-physical system testbeds. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(1), pp.446-464.

[18] Das, S., Bull, D.M. and Whatmough, P.N., 2015. Error-resilient design techniques for reliable and dependable computing. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, 15(1), pp.24-34.

[19] Dinar, M., Shah, J.J., Cagan, J., Leifer, L., Linsey, J., Smith, S.M. and Hernandez, N.V., 2015. Empirical studies of designer thinking: past, present, and future. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(2).

[20] Dong, P., Wang, J., Huang, J. and Wang, H., 2015. Split-TCP based acceleration gateway over packet lossy networks. China Communications, 12(5), pp.100-112.

[21] Dongarra, J., Herault, T. and Robert, Y., 2015. Fault tolerance techniques for high-performance computing. In Fault-tolerance techniques for high-performance computing (pp. 3-85). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[22] Fachkha, C. and Debbabi, M., 2015. Darknet as a source of cyber intelligence: Survey, taxonomy, and characterization. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(2), pp.1197-1227.

[23] Garg, P. and Gupta, A.K., 2017. EXTENSIVE REVIEWS OF OSPF FOR REDUCING THE CONVERGENCE TIME. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(9).

[24] Ghosn, M., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Frangopol, D.M., McAllister, T.P., Bocchini, P., Manuel, L., Ellingwood, B.R., Arangio, S., Bontempi, F., Shah, M. and Akiyama, M., 2016. Performance indicators for structural systems and infrastructure networks. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(9), p.F4016003.

[25] Gray, C. and Malins, J., 2016. Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Routledge.

[26] Han, B., Gopalakrishnan, V., Ji, L. and Lee, S., 2015. Network function virtualization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations. IEEE communications magazine, 53(2), pp.90-97.

[27] Hashem, I.A.T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N.B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A. and Khan, S.U., 2015. The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Information systems, 47, pp.98-115.

[28] Kafi, M.A., Othman, J.B. and Badache, N., 2017. A survey on reliability protocols in wireless sensor networks. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(2), pp.1-47.

[29] Kaur, P., Kumar, M. and Bhandari, A., 2017. A review of detection approaches for distributed denial of service attacks. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 5(1), pp.301-320.

[30] Khalid, S., Ullah, S., Alam, A. and Din, F., 2016. Optimal latency in collaborative virtual environment to increase user performance: A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 142(3), pp.35-47.

[31] Khan, A.M., Freitag, F., Gupta, S., Muntès-Mulero, V., Dominiak, J. and Matthews, P., 2015, March. On supporting service selection for collaborative multi-cloud ecosystems in community networks. In 2015 IEEE 29th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (pp. 634-641). IEEE.

[32] Kousalya, G., Balakrishnan, P. and Raj, C.P., 2017. Automated workflow scheduling in self-adaptive clouds (pp. 65-83). Berlin: Springer.

[33] Kua, J., Armitage, G. and Branch, P., 2017. A survey of rate adaptation techniques for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), pp.1842-1866.

[34] Lema, M.A., Laya, A., Mahmoodi, T., Cuevas, M., Sachs, J., Markendahl, J. and Dohler, M., 2017. Business case and technology analysis for 5G low latency applications. IEEE Access, 5, pp.5917-5935.

[35] MacVittie, L., 2015. Application Delivery Optimization. F5 Networks, Inc, 17.

[36] Mahjabin, T., Xiao, Y., Sun, G. and Jiang, W., 2017. A survey of distributed denial-of-service attack, prevention, and mitigation techniques. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(12), p.1550147717741463.

[37] Milovanović, S., Janaćković, T. and Stanković, J., 2017. The Role of Electronic Business in the Reengeneering and Integration of Business Processes. Economic Themes, 55(4), pp.539-560.

[38] Murillo, A.F., Rueda, S.J., Morales, L.V. and Cárdenas, Á.A., 2017. SDN and NFV security: challenges for integrated solutions. In Guide to Security in SDN and NFV: Challenges, Opportunities, and Applications (pp. 75-101). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[39] Mylrea, M. and Gourisetti, S.N.G., 2017. Cybersecurity and optimization in smart “autonomous” buildings. In Autonomy and Artificial Intelligence: A Threat or Savior? (pp. 263-294). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[40] Nahrstedt, K., Li, H., Nguyen, P., Chang, S. and Vu, L., 2016, April. Internet of mobile things: Mobility-driven challenges, designs and implementations. In 2016 IEEE First international conference on internet-of-things design and implementation (ioTDI) (pp. 25-36). IEEE.

[41] Nespoli, P., Papamartzivanos, D., Mármol, F.G. and Kambourakis, G., 2017. Optimal countermeasures selection against cyber attacks: A comprehensive survey on reaction frameworks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(2), pp.1361-1396.

[42] Niephaus, C., Kretschmer, M. and Ghinea, G., 2016. QoS provisioning in converged satellite and terrestrial networks: A survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(4), pp.2415-2441.

[43] Nirmala, M.B., 2015. Cloud based big data analytics: WAN optimization techniques and solutions. In Computational Intelligence for Big Data Analysis: Frontier Advances and Applications (pp. 237-254). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[44] Oliveira, F., Suneja, S., Nadgowda, S., Nagpurkar, P. and Isci, C., 2017. A cloud-native monitoring and analytics framework. IBM Research Division Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Tech. Rep. RC25669 (WAT1710-006), p.119.

[45] Panetto, H., Zdravkovic, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Romero, D., Cecil, J. and Mezgár, I., 2016. New perspectives for the future interoperable enterprise systems. Computers in industry, 79, pp.47-63.

[46] Peng, M., Li, Y., Zhao, Z. and Wang, C., 2015. System architecture and key technologies for 5G heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. IEEE network, 29(2), pp.6-14.

[47] Pereira, T., Barreto, L. and Amaral, A., 2017. Network and information security challenges within Industry 4.0 paradigm. Procedia manufacturing, 13, pp.1253-1260.

[48] Rawat, D.B. and Reddy, S.R., 2016. Software defined networking architecture, security and energy efficiency: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(1), pp.325-346.

[49] Rojas-Cessa, R., Kaymak, Y. and Dong, Z., 2015. Schemes for fast transmission of flows in data center networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(3), pp.1391-1422.

[50] Sarangapani, J., 2017. Wireless ad hoc and sensor networks: protocols, performance, and control. CRC press.

[51] Scott, B.G., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Clifford, S., Tein, J.Y., Stoll, R. and Goldsmith, H.H., 2016. A twin factor mixture modeling approach to childhood temperament: Differential heritability. Child development, 87(6), pp.1940-1955.

[52] Sinha, Y. and Haribabu, K., 2017. A survey: Hybrid sdn. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 100, pp.35-55.

[53] Tayeb, S. and Latifi, S., 2016, September. Will an emerging standard take over the routing realm? An evaluative analysis of DUAL and SPF. In 2016 6th International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

[54] Thekdi, S. and Aven, T., 2016. An enhanced data-analytic framework for integrating risk management and performance management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 156, pp.277-287.

[55] Toffetti, G., Brunner, S., Blöchlinger, M., Spillner, J. and Bohnert, T.M., 2017. Self-managing cloud-native applications: Design, implementation, and experience. Future Generation Computer Systems, 72, pp.165-179.

[56] Uday, P. and Marais, K., 2015. Designing resilient systems‐of‐systems: A survey of metrics, methods, and challenges. Systems Engineering, 18(5), pp.491-510.

[57] Wood, T., Ramakrishnan, K.K., Hwang, J., Liu, G. and Zhang, W., 2015. Toward a software-based network: integrating software defined networking and network function virtualization. IEEE Network, 29(3), pp.36-41.

[58] Xu, X.Y., Liu, J., Li, H.Y. and Jiang, M., 2016. Capacity-oriented passenger flow control under uncertain demand: Algorithm development and real-world case study. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 87, pp.130-148.

[59] Yampolskiy, R., 2016. On controllability of artificial intelligence.

[60] Zia, M.F., Ouameur, M.A., Bagaa, M., Massicotte, D. and Ksentini, A., 2017. Physical Communication.

@article{1712543,
      author = {Ugwu-Oju Ukamaka Mary, Okeke Obinna ThankGod, Nwankwo Constance Obiuto},
      title = {Review of Network Protocol Stability Techniques for Enterprise Information Systems},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {1},
      number = {8},
      pages = {196-210},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712543.pdf},
      abstract = {The stability of network protocols is a foundational requirement for ensuring reliable, predictable, and high-performance communication within enterprise information systems. As organizations increasingly adopt cloud computing, virtualization, mobile integration, and distributed architectures, protocol stability has become more critical and more challenging to maintain. This review synthesizes classical and modern stability techniques used to strengthen the behavior of network protocols under dynamic traffic conditions, heterogeneous environments, and evolving security threats. The review begins by examining traditional mechanisms such as congestion control, routing convergence optimization, error-control schemes, and redundancy methods that have historically underpinned protocol robustness. It then explores emerging techniques driven by software-defined networking (SDN), network function virtualization (NFV), multipath transport, and AI-enabled optimization. These contemporary approaches introduce adaptive, programmable, and predictive capabilities that extend protocol stability beyond static design principles toward more intelligent and self-regulating behaviors. Furthermore, the review analyzes stability challenges specific to hybrid and multi-cloud environments, where latency variability, distributed workloads, and fragmented control planes necessitate advanced stabilization strategies such as SD-WAN, autonomous traffic engineering, and workload-aware routing. Security-oriented stability techniques, including protocol hardening, DDoS mitigation, and zero-trust-aligned traffic control, are also evaluated due to their increasing importance in mitigating disruptions caused by malicious activities. The review highlights performance evaluation methodologies and stability metrics, emphasizing the need for rigorous benchmarking frameworks to assess protocol behavior under diverse operational conditions. Finally, gaps in current research and opportunities for future exploration such as intent-based networking, machine-learning-driven protocols, and resilience-oriented cross-layer optimization are discussed. Overall, this review underscores the growing need for integrated, adaptive, and intelligence-driven stability techniques to support the reliability and efficiency of modern enterprise information systems. Strengthening protocol stability will remain essential as enterprises continue to scale digital operations and embrace more complex networked ecosystems.},
      keywords = {Network protocol stability, Enterprise information systems, Congestion control, Routing convergence, SDN, NFV, AI/ML, Multipath transport, SD-WAN, DDoS mitigation, Performance metrics.},
      month = {February},
  }